These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

261 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21837623)

  • 1. Graphical approaches for multiple comparison procedures using weighted Bonferroni, Simes, or parametric tests.
    Bretz F; Posch M; Glimm E; Klinglmueller F; Maurer W; Rohmeyer K
    Biom J; 2011 Nov; 53(6):894-913. PubMed ID: 21837623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A graphical approach to sequentially rejective multiple test procedures.
    Bretz F; Maurer W; Brannath W; Posch M
    Stat Med; 2009 Feb; 28(4):586-604. PubMed ID: 19051220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Graphical approaches using a Bonferroni mixture of weighted Simes tests.
    Lu K
    Stat Med; 2016 Sep; 35(22):4041-55. PubMed ID: 27226068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Compatible simultaneous lower confidence bounds for the Holm procedure and other Bonferroni-based closed tests.
    Strassburger K; Bretz F
    Stat Med; 2008 Oct; 27(24):4914-27. PubMed ID: 18618415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A recycling framework for the construction of Bonferroni-based multiple tests.
    Burman CF; Sonesson C; Guilbaud O
    Stat Med; 2009 Feb; 28(5):739-61. PubMed ID: 19142850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Trimmed weighted Simes' test for two one-sided hypotheses with arbitrarily correlated test statistics.
    Brannath W; Bretz F; Maurer W; Sarkar S
    Biom J; 2009 Dec; 51(6):885-98. PubMed ID: 20014203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A unified framework for weighted parametric multiple test procedures.
    Xi D; Glimm E; Maurer W; Bretz F
    Biom J; 2017 Sep; 59(5):918-931. PubMed ID: 28370196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Symmetric graphs for equally weighted tests, with application to the Hochberg procedure.
    Xi D; Bretz F
    Stat Med; 2019 Nov; 38(27):5268-5282. PubMed ID: 31657025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Test and power considerations for multiple endpoint analyses using sequentially rejective graphical procedures.
    Bretz F; Maurer W; Hommel G
    Stat Med; 2011 Jun; 30(13):1489-501. PubMed ID: 21290405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Allocating recycled significance levels in group sequential procedures for multiple endpoints.
    Xi D; Tamhane AC
    Biom J; 2015 Jan; 57(1):90-107. PubMed ID: 25355702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A note on testing families of hypotheses using graphical procedures.
    Maurer W; Bretz F
    Stat Med; 2014 Dec; 33(30):5340-6. PubMed ID: 25043831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Gatekeeping strategies for clinical trials that do not require all primary effects to be significant.
    Dmitrienko A; Offen WW; Westfall PH
    Stat Med; 2003 Aug; 22(15):2387-400. PubMed ID: 12872297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An Extended Framework of Multiple Testing in Group Sequential Design.
    Jin M; Zhang P
    Ther Innov Regul Sci; 2023 Jul; 57(4):662-670. PubMed ID: 36928980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A parametric multiple test procedure to adaptive group-sequential trials allowing for mid-term modifications.
    Jin M
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2020 Mar; 90():105955. PubMed ID: 32028024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A simple and flexible graphical approach for adaptive group-sequential clinical trials.
    Sugitani T; Bretz F; Maurer W
    J Biopharm Stat; 2016; 26(2):202-16. PubMed ID: 25372071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A decision theoretic approach to optimization of multiple testing procedures.
    Lisovskaja V; Burman CF
    Biom J; 2015 Jan; 57(1):64-75. PubMed ID: 25394261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Advances in p-Value Based Multiple Test Procedures.
    Tamhane AC; Gou J
    J Biopharm Stat; 2018; 28(1):10-27. PubMed ID: 29072552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fallback tests for co-primary endpoints.
    Ristl R; Frommlet F; Koch A; Posch M
    Stat Med; 2016 Jul; 35(16):2669-86. PubMed ID: 26919166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Alternative confidence regions for bonferroni-based closed-testing procedures that are not alpha-exhaustive.
    Guilbaud O
    Biom J; 2009 Aug; 51(4):721-35. PubMed ID: 19655313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. General multistage gatekeeping procedures.
    Dmitrienko A; Tamhane AC; Wiens BL
    Biom J; 2008 Oct; 50(5):667-77. PubMed ID: 18932130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.