These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21837754)

  • 1. Prediction of delivery mode with transperineal ultrasound in women with prolonged first stage of labor.
    Mongelli M; Benzie R
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Oct; 38(4):481-2; author reply 482-3. PubMed ID: 21837754
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prediction of delivery mode with transperineal ultrasound in women with prolonged first stage of labor.
    Torkildsen EA; Salvesen KÅ; Eggebø TM
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Jun; 37(6):702-8. PubMed ID: 21308837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Are ultrasound measurements of the cervical length and fetal head-perineum distance predictive of delivery outcome in post-term pregnancies?].
    Vernet T; Rivaux G; Deruelle P
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2016 Jun; 44(6):329-35. PubMed ID: 27216958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Transperineal sonographic assessment of angle of progression as a predictor of successful vaginal delivery following induction of labor.
    Gillor M; Vaisbuch E; Zaks S; Barak O; Hagay Z; Levy R
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Feb; 49(2):240-245. PubMed ID: 27062415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Transperineal ultrasound imaging in prolonged second stage of labor with occipitoanterior presenting fetuses: how well does the 'angle of progression' predict the mode of delivery?
    Kalache KD; Dückelmann AM; Michaelis SA; Lange J; Cichon G; Dudenhausen JW
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Mar; 33(3):326-30. PubMed ID: 19224527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prediction of labor and delivery by transperineal ultrasound in pregnancies with prelabor rupture of membranes at term.
    Eggebø TM; Gjessing LK; Heien C; Smedvig E; Økland I; Romundstad P; Salvesen KA
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Apr; 27(4):387-91. PubMed ID: 16565994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Agreement between two- and three-dimensional transperineal ultrasound methods in assessing fetal head descent in the first stage of labor.
    Torkildsen EA; Salvesen KÅ; Eggebø TM
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Mar; 39(3):310-5. PubMed ID: 21630362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ultrasound assessment of fetal head-perineum distance before induction of labor.
    Eggebø TM; Heien C; Økland I; Gjessing LK; Romundstad P; Salvesen KA
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Aug; 32(2):199-204. PubMed ID: 18528923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of sonographic assessment of the progress of labor.
    Głuszak M; Dziadecki W; Wielgoś M; Węgrzyn P
    Ginekol Pol; 2015 Feb; 86(2):126-31. PubMed ID: 25807837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Visual biofeedback using transperineal ultrasound in second stage of labor.
    Gilboa Y; Frenkel TI; Schlesinger Y; Rousseau S; Hamiel D; Achiron R; Perlman S
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jul; 52(1):91-96. PubMed ID: 29155474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Preliminary study of fetal head engagement diagnosis by transperineal ultrasound before operative vaginal delivery].
    Raia-Barjat T; Fanget C; Trombert B; Aouar Z; Chêne G; Varlet MN; Seffert P; Chauleur C
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2012 Jun; 41(4):346-52. PubMed ID: 22542370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cervical length and maternal factors in expectantly managed prolonged pregnancy: prediction of onset of labor and mode of delivery.
    Rao A; Celik E; Poggi S; Poon L; Nicolaides KH;
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Oct; 32(5):646-51. PubMed ID: 18816476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Relationship between intrapartum transperineal ultrasound measurement of angle of progression and head-perineum distance with correlation to conventional clinical parameters of labor progress and time to delivery.
    Chan YT; Ng VK; Yung WK; Lo TK; Leung WC; Lau WL
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2015 Aug; 28(12):1476-81. PubMed ID: 25163523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Transvaginal sonography of the uterine cervix prior to labor induction.
    Gabriel R; Darnaud T; Chalot F; Gonzalez N; Leymarie F; Quereux C
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Mar; 19(3):254-7. PubMed ID: 11896946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Predicting mode of delivery using mid-pregnancy ultrasonographic measurement of cervical length.
    Kalu CA; Umeora OU; Egwuatu EV; Okwor A
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2012; 15(3):338-43. PubMed ID: 22960972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ultrasound in labor and delivery.
    Molina FS; Nicolaides KH
    Fetal Diagn Ther; 2010; 27(2):61-7. PubMed ID: 20173318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison between subjective and objective assessments of the cervix before induction of labour.
    Elghorori MR; Hassan I; Dartey W; Abdel-Aziz E; Bradley M
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2006 Aug; 26(6):521-6. PubMed ID: 17000497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sonographic prediction of vaginal delivery in prolonged labor: a two-center study.
    Eggebø TM; Hassan WA; Salvesen KÅ; Lindtjørn E; Lees CC
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Feb; 43(2):195-201. PubMed ID: 24105705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Measurement of subpubic arch angle by three-dimensional transperineal ultrasound and impact on vaginal delivery.
    Albrich SB; Shek K; Krahn U; Dietz HP
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Oct; 46(4):496-500. PubMed ID: 25678020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of selected ultrasonography parameters in the second stage of labor in prediction mode of delivery.
    Ciaciura-Jarno M; Cnota W; Wójtowicz D; Niesłuchowska-Hoxha A; Ruci A; Kierach R; Stępień A; Nowak A; Sodowska P
    Ginekol Pol; 2016; 87(6):448-53. PubMed ID: 27418223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.