These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2183860)

  • 1. Limitations of Doppler ultrasound in the assessment of the function of prosthetic mitral valves.
    Chambers J; Jackson G; Jewitt D
    Br Heart J; 1990 Mar; 63(3):189-94. PubMed ID: 2183860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Normal and abnormal prosthetic valve function as assessed by Doppler echocardiography.
    Panidis IP; Ross J; Mintz GS
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1986 Aug; 8(2):317-26. PubMed ID: 2942593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Doppler echocardiographic characteristics of normal and dysfunctioning prosthetic valves in the tricuspid and mitral position.
    Pye M; Weerasana N; Bain WH; Hutton I; Cobbe SM
    Br Heart J; 1990 Jan; 63(1):41-4. PubMed ID: 2310643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improved Doppler assessment of the Bjork-Shiley mitral prosthesis using the continuity equation.
    Mohan JC; Agrawal R; Arora R; Khalilullah M
    Int J Cardiol; 1994 Mar; 43(3):321-6. PubMed ID: 8181890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Doppler echocardiography in assessing mechanical and biological heart valve prostheses].
    Minardi G; Di Segni M; Boccardi L; Ferrari O; Giovannini E
    G Ital Cardiol; 1988 Feb; 18(2):121-34. PubMed ID: 3410201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Intracardiac flow dynamic alterations with a prosthetic mitral valve studied by pulsed Doppler technique].
    Kitabatake A; Tanouchi J; Asao M; Mishima M; Ishihara K; Masuyama T; Inoue M; Abe H; Matsuo H; Morita H
    J Cardiogr; 1985 Jun; 15(2):469-82. PubMed ID: 4093627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Doppler ultrasound of normally functioning mechanical mitral and aortic valve prostheses.
    Gibbs JL; Wharton GA; Williams GJ
    Int J Cardiol; 1988 Mar; 18(3):391-8. PubMed ID: 3360523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Doppler haemodynamic profiles of clinically and echocardiographically normal mitral and aortic valve prostheses.
    Nihoyannopoulos P; Kambouroglou D; Athanassopoulos G; Nadazdin A; Smith P; Oakley CM
    Eur Heart J; 1992 Mar; 13(3):348-55. PubMed ID: 1597221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mitral pressure half-time: is it a valid measure of orifice area in artificial heart valves?
    Chambers JB
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1993 Sep; 2(5):571-7. PubMed ID: 8269170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Genesis and clinical significance of an apical diastolic rumble in patients with mitral Björk-Shiley valve: a Doppler echocardiographic study].
    Kawano K; Fukuda N; Okumoto T; Emi S; Hosoi K; Uchida T; Kawano T; Iuchi A; Hayashi M; Oki T
    J Cardiol; 1990; 20(1):147-57. PubMed ID: 2093747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Doppler measurement of cardiac output across prosthetic mitral valves.
    Dittmann H; Voelker W; Karsch KR; Seipel L
    Klin Wochenschr; 1990 Mar; 68(5):263-8. PubMed ID: 2325355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Hemodynamics after mitral valve replacement with Starr-Edwards, Björk-Shiley and Lillehei-Kaster protheses (author's transl)].
    Haerten K; Both A; Lück J; Herzer J; Loogen F
    Z Kardiol; 1977 May; 66(5):242-6. PubMed ID: 878552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Doppler evaluation of porcine mitral valve dysfunction].
    Nakamura K; Matsumura K; Satomi G; Sakai K; Ishizuka N; Mori K; Shiina T; Kikuchi N; Hirosawa K; Takao A
    J Cardiogr; 1986 Dec; 16(4):929-39. PubMed ID: 3429909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Björk-Shiley and Ionescu-Shiley heart valve prostheses. In vitro comparison of their hydrodynamic performance in the mitral position.
    Scotten LN; Walker DK; Brownlee RT
    Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1983; 17(3):201-9. PubMed ID: 6648395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Doppler sonographic evaluation of the Duromedics-Edwards bileaflet valve at five-year follow up.
    Globits S; Rödler S; Moritz A; Schreiner W; Pacher R; Glogar D; Wolner E
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1993 Nov; 2(6):665-70. PubMed ID: 7719508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative phonocardiographic, echocardiographic and Doppler echocardiographic evaluation of normally functioning Medtronic Hall and Björk-Shiley mitral prosthetic valves.
    Fukuda N; Oki T; Tabata T; Hosoi K; Iuchi A; Manabe K; Kageji Y; Sasaki M; Hama M; Ito S
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1994 May; 3(3):275-82. PubMed ID: 8087264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Non-invasive estimation of transmitral pressure gradient and mitral valve area in mitral stenosis by an ultrasonic pulsed Doppler technique].
    Asao M; Kitabatake A; Inoue M; Tanouchi J; Morita T; Masuyama T; Mishima M; Shimazu T; Ishihara K; Fujii K
    J Cardiogr; 1984 Jun; 14(1):149-61. PubMed ID: 6240509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Doppler echocardiography normal values in various types of mitral valve prostheses].
    Curtius JM; Pawelzik H; Mittmann B; Breuer HW; Loogen F
    Z Kardiol; 1987 Jan; 76(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 3564614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Experimental evaluation of mechanical haemolysis with Starr-Edwards, Kay-Shiley and Björk-Shiley valves.
    Sallam IA; Shaw A; Bain WH
    Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1976; 10(2):117-22. PubMed ID: 951582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Doppler hemodynamic characteristics of four widely used aortic valve prostheses.
    Masotti C; De Castro C; Aquilina M; Bonfranceschi P; Rusticali F
    Minerva Cardioangiol; 1990 Nov; 38(11):461-71. PubMed ID: 2093848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.