343 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21839402)
1. Cost utility analysis based on a head-to-head Phase 3 trial comparing ustekinumab and etanercept in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: a Canadian perspective.
Pan F; Brazier NC; Shear NH; Jivraj F; Schenkel B; Brown R
Value Health; 2011; 14(5):652-6. PubMed ID: 21839402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost per responder analysis of ustekinumab and etanercept for moderate to severe plaque psoriasis.
Martin S; Feldman SR; Augustin M; Szapary P; Schenkel B
J Dermatolog Treat; 2011 Jun; 22(3):138-43. PubMed ID: 21254886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cost effectiveness of moderate to severe psoriasis therapy with etanercept and ustekinumab in the United States.
Villacorta R; Hay JW; Messali A
Pharmacoeconomics; 2013 Sep; 31(9):823-39. PubMed ID: 23975739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ustekinumab for the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis.
Gospodarevskaya E; Picot J; Cooper K; Loveman E; Takeda A
Health Technol Assess; 2009 Oct; 13 Suppl 3():61-6. PubMed ID: 19846031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cost-efficacy of adalimumab, etanercept, infliximab and ustekinumab for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis.
Ferrándiz C; García A; Blasco AJ; Lázaro P
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2012 Jun; 26(6):768-77. PubMed ID: 22126264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Etanercept and efalizumab for the treatment of psoriasis: a systematic review.
Woolacott N; Hawkins N; Mason A; Kainth A; Khadjesari Z; Vergel YB; Misso K; Light K; Chalmers R; Sculpher M; Riemsma R
Health Technol Assess; 2006 Nov; 10(46):1-233, i-iv. PubMed ID: 17083854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of ustekinumab and etanercept for moderate-to-severe psoriasis.
Griffiths CE; Strober BE; van de Kerkhof P; Ho V; Fidelus-Gort R; Yeilding N; Guzzo C; Xia Y; Zhou B; Li S; Dooley LT; Goldstein NH; Menter A;
N Engl J Med; 2010 Jan; 362(2):118-28. PubMed ID: 20071701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Efficacy and safety of ustekinumab and etanercept for the treatment of psoriasis.
Uhlenhake EE; Feldman SR
Expert Opin Biol Ther; 2010 Jul; 10(7):1105-12. PubMed ID: 20446825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cost-effectiveness of psoriasis therapy with etanercept in Germany.
Heinen-Kammerer T; Daniel D; Stratmann L; Rychlik R; Boehncke WH
J Dtsch Dermatol Ges; 2007 Sep; 5(9):762-8. PubMed ID: 17760896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparing biological therapies in psoriasis: implications for clinical practice.
Griffiths CE
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2010 Oct; 24 Suppl 6():10-4. PubMed ID: 20831704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Long-term safety experience of ustekinumab in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis (Part I of II): results from analyses of general safety parameters from pooled Phase 2 and 3 clinical trials.
Lebwohl M; Leonardi C; Griffiths CE; Prinz JC; Szapary PO; Yeilding N; Guzzo C; Li S; Hsu MC; Strober B
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2012 May; 66(5):731-41. PubMed ID: 21930328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Infliximab for the treatment of adults with psoriasis.
Loveman E; Turner D; Hartwell D; Cooper K; Clegg A
Health Technol Assess; 2009 Jun; 13 Suppl 1():55-60. PubMed ID: 19567215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cost-effectiveness of biological therapy in remission induction of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis.
Schmitt-Rau K; Rosenbach T; Radtke MA; Augustin M
Dermatology; 2010; 221(3):236-42. PubMed ID: 20924159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biological treatments for moderate-to-severe psoriasis: indirect comparison.
Galván-Banqueri M; Marín Gil R; Santos Ramos B; Bautista Paloma FJ
J Clin Pharm Ther; 2013 Apr; 38(2):121-30. PubMed ID: 23442134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ustekinumab: new drug. Suspicion of carcinogenicity: too great a risk for psoriasis patients.
Prescrire Int; 2009 Oct; 18(103):202-4. PubMed ID: 19882785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Economic evaluation of etanercept in the management of chronic plaque psoriasis.
Lloyd A; Reeves P; Conway P; Reynolds A; Baxter G
Br J Dermatol; 2009 Feb; 160(2):380-6. PubMed ID: 18808413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cost-effectiveness analysis of TNF-alpha blockers for the treatment of chronic plaque psoriasis in the perspective of the Italian health-care system.
de Portu S; Del Giglio M; Altomare G; Arcangeli F; Berardesca E; Calzavara-Pinton P; Lotti T; Martini P; Peserico A; Simonacci M; Vena GA; Girolomoni G
Dermatol Ther; 2010; 23 Suppl 1():S7-13. PubMed ID: 20136921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Markov model into the cost-utility over five years of etanercept and infliximab compared with usual care in patients with active ankylosing spondylitis.
Boonen A; van der Heijde D; Severens JL; Boendermaker A; Landewé R; Braun J; Brandt J; Sieper J; van der Linden S
Ann Rheum Dis; 2006 Feb; 65(2):201-8. PubMed ID: 16014677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Costs of therapy with biologics in the treatment of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis in the context of the Italian health-care system.
Terranova L; Mattozzi C; Richetta AG; Mantuano M; Cardosi L; Teruzzi C
G Ital Dermatol Venereol; 2014 Feb; 149(1):131-43. PubMed ID: 24566574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The ACCEPT study: ustekinumab versus etanercept in moderate-to-severe psoriasis patients.
Young MS; Horn EJ; Cather JC
Expert Rev Clin Immunol; 2011 Jan; 7(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 21162644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]