BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

344 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21839676)

  • 1. Finding the right control: the mismatch negativity under investigation.
    Ruhnau P; Herrmann B; Schröger E
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2012 Mar; 123(3):507-12. PubMed ID: 21839676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Auditory pre-attentive processing of Chinese tones.
    Yang LJ; Cao KL; Wei CG; Liu YZ
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2008 Dec; 121(23):2429-33. PubMed ID: 19102963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Preattentive cortical-evoked responses to pure tones, harmonic tones, and speech: influence of music training.
    Nikjeh DA; Lister JJ; Frisch SA
    Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):432-46. PubMed ID: 19494778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
    Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The spatio-temporal dynamics of deviance and target detection in the passive and active auditory oddball paradigm: a sLORETA study.
    Justen C; Herbert C
    BMC Neurosci; 2018 Apr; 19(1):25. PubMed ID: 29673322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. N1 and the mismatch negativity are spatiotemporally distinct ERP components: disruption of immediate memory by auditory distraction can be related to N1.
    Campbell T; Winkler I; Kujala T
    Psychophysiology; 2007 Jul; 44(4):530-40. PubMed ID: 17532805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Auditory streaming affects the processing of successive deviant and standard sounds.
    Müller D; Widmann A; Schröger E
    Psychophysiology; 2005 Nov; 42(6):668-76. PubMed ID: 16364062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. MMN or no MMN: no magnitude of deviance effect on the MMN amplitude.
    Horváth J; Czigler I; Jacobsen T; Maess B; Schröger E; Winkler I
    Psychophysiology; 2008 Jan; 45(1):60-9. PubMed ID: 17868262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Neuropsychological correlates of auditory perceptual inference: a mismatch negativity (MMN) study.
    Todd J; Myers R; Pirillo R; Drysdale K
    Brain Res; 2010 Jan; 1310():113-23. PubMed ID: 19914219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mismatch negativity (MMN) to successive deviants within one hierarchically structured auditory object.
    Jacobsen TK; Steinberg J; Truckenbrodt H; Jacobsen T
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Jan; 87(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 23041235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mismatch negativity (MMN) in multiple sclerosis: an event-related potentials study in 46 patients.
    Jung J; Morlet D; Mercier B; Confavreux C; Fischer C
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Jan; 117(1):85-93. PubMed ID: 16325469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Implicit, intuitive, and explicit knowledge of abstract regularities in a sound sequence: an event-related brain potential study.
    van Zuijen TL; Simoens VL; Paavilainen P; Näätänen R; Tervaniemi M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Aug; 18(8):1292-303. PubMed ID: 16859415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cascade and no-repetition rules are comparable controls for the auditory frequency mismatch negativity in oddball tasks.
    Wiens S; Szychowska M; Eklund R; van Berlekom E
    Psychophysiology; 2019 Jan; 56(1):e13280. PubMed ID: 30246255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Refractoriness, habituation, and mismatch effects in the auditory event-related potential to alternating stimuli.
    Yagcioglu S; Ungan P
    Neuroreport; 2008 Jan; 19(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 18281891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Lasting first impressions: a conservative bias in automatic filters of the acoustic environment.
    Todd J; Provost A; Cooper G
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Oct; 49(12):3399-405. PubMed ID: 21872613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Measuring duration mismatch negativity.
    Jacobsen T; Schröger E
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2003 Jun; 114(6):1133-43. PubMed ID: 12804682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Memory-based mismatch response to changes in duration of auditory stimuli: an MEG study.
    Hsu WY; Cheng CH; Lin HC; Liao KK; Wu ZA; Ho LT; Lin YY
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2010 Oct; 121(10):1744-50. PubMed ID: 20471314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of multi-attribute auditory discrimination in dyslexia with the mismatch negativity.
    Kujala T; Lovio R; Lepistö T; Laasonen M; Näätänen R
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Apr; 117(4):885-93. PubMed ID: 16497552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. First-impression bias effects on mismatch negativity to auditory spatial deviants.
    Fitzgerald K; Provost A; Todd J
    Psychophysiology; 2018 Apr; 55(4):. PubMed ID: 28972671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Differences in the neural basis of automatic auditory and visual time perception: ERP evidence from an across-modal delayed response oddball task.
    Chen Y; Huang X; Luo Y; Peng C; Liu C
    Brain Res; 2010 Apr; 1325():100-11. PubMed ID: 20170647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.