BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

344 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21839676)

  • 21. The mismatch negativity (MMN) with no standard stimulus.
    Pakarinen S; Huotilainen M; Näätänen R
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2010 Jul; 121(7):1043-50. PubMed ID: 20207581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A comparative study of mismatch negativity (MMN) in epilepsy and non-epileptic seizures.
    Gene-Cos N; Pottinger R; Barrett G; Trimble MR; Ring HA
    Epileptic Disord; 2005 Dec; 7(4):363-72. PubMed ID: 16338681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. How the human auditory system treats repetition amongst change.
    Horváth J; Winkler I
    Neurosci Lett; 2004 Sep; 368(2):157-61. PubMed ID: 15351440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Behavioral and event-related potential distraction effects with regularly occurring auditory deviants.
    Jankowiak S; Berti S
    Psychophysiology; 2007 Jan; 44(1):79-85. PubMed ID: 17241142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Temporal integration of deviant sound in automatic detection reflected by mismatch negativity.
    Shiga T; Yabe H; Yu L; Nozaki M; Itagaki S; Lan TH; Niwa S
    Neuroreport; 2011 May; 22(7):337-41. PubMed ID: 21502927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Does mismatch negativity show differences in reading-disabled children compared to normal children and children with attention deficit?
    Huttunen T; Halonen A; Kaartinen J; Lyytinen H
    Dev Neuropsychol; 2007; 31(3):453-70. PubMed ID: 17559334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. ERP and EOG responses elicited by deviant tones when presented with and without standard tones to reading subjects.
    Ruusuvirta T
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2001 Nov; 42(3):279-86. PubMed ID: 11812394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. ERPs to pitch changes: a result of reduced responses to standard tones in rabbits.
    Ruusuvirta T; Korhonen T; Arikoski J; Kivirikko K
    Neuroreport; 1996 Jan; 7(2):413-6. PubMed ID: 8730794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Numerical discrimination in newborn infants as revealed by event-related potentials to tone sequences.
    Ruusuvirta T; Huotilainen M; Fellman V; Näätänen R
    Eur J Neurosci; 2009 Oct; 30(8):1620-4. PubMed ID: 19811535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Personal significance is encoded automatically by the human brain: an event-related potential study with ringtones.
    Roye A; Jacobsen T; Schröger E
    Eur J Neurosci; 2007 Aug; 26(3):784-90. PubMed ID: 17634070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Mismatch negativity (MMN) to very short interval between regular tones].
    Jiang DM; Paavilainen P; Lavikainen J; Reinikainen K; Näätänen R
    Sheng Li Xue Bao; 1994 Dec; 46(6):561-7. PubMed ID: 7878484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Measurement of extensive auditory discrimination profiles using the mismatch negativity (MMN) of the auditory event-related potential (ERP).
    Pakarinen S; Takegata R; Rinne T; Huotilainen M; Näätänen R
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Jan; 118(1):177-85. PubMed ID: 17070103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Enhanced development of auditory change detection in musically trained school-aged children: a longitudinal event-related potential study.
    Putkinen V; Tervaniemi M; Saarikivi K; Ojala P; Huotilainen M
    Dev Sci; 2014 Mar; 17(2):282-97. PubMed ID: 24283257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evidence that the mismatch negativity to pattern violations does not vary with deviant probability.
    Sculthorpe LD; Campbell KB
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2011 Nov; 122(11):2236-45. PubMed ID: 21600844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effects of sleep deprivation on auditory change detection: a N1-mismatch negativity study.
    Bortoletto M; Tona Gde M; Scozzari S; Sarasso S; Stegagno L
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2011 Sep; 81(3):312-6. PubMed ID: 21843559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. "...and were instructed to read a self-selected book while ignoring the auditory stimuli": the effects of task demands on the mismatch negativity.
    Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Sep; 116(9):2142-52. PubMed ID: 16029961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Theta oscillation during auditory change detection: An MEG study.
    Hsiao FJ; Wu ZA; Ho LT; Lin YY
    Biol Psychol; 2009 Apr; 81(1):58-66. PubMed ID: 19428969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Small changes in temporal deviance modulate mismatch negativity amplitude in humans.
    Kisley MA; Davalos DB; Layton HS; Pratt D; Ellis JK; Seger CA
    Neurosci Lett; 2004 Apr; 358(3):197-200. PubMed ID: 15039115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The processing of frequency deviations within sounds: evidence for the predictive nature of the Mismatch Negativity (MMN) system.
    Grimm S; Schröger E
    Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2007; 25(3-4):241-9. PubMed ID: 17943002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Independent component analysis on the mismatch negativity in an uninterrupted sound paradigm.
    Kalyakin I; González N; Kärkkäinen T; Lyytinen H
    J Neurosci Methods; 2008 Sep; 174(2):301-12. PubMed ID: 18703088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.