These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21839940)

  • 1. Some thoughts on the review process.
    Schramm J
    World Neurosurg; 2011; 76(1-2):43-4. PubMed ID: 21839940
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Civil, sensible, and constructive peer review in APS journals.
    Raff H; Brown D
    Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab; 2013 Aug; 305(3):E315-6. PubMed ID: 23673160
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Civil, sensible, and constructive peer review in APS journals.
    Raff H; Brown D
    Am J Physiol Renal Physiol; 2013 Aug; 305(3):F227-8. PubMed ID: 23678044
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. What do journal editors want? … and everything you wanted to know about the peer review process for journal publication.
    Muir-Cochrane E
    Nurs Health Sci; 2013 Sep; 15(3):263-4. PubMed ID: 24021114
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Peer review: what is it all about?
    Parish LC
    Skinmed; 2008; 7(1):6-7. PubMed ID: 18174794
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Peer review: integral to Science and indispensable to Annals.
    Laine C; Mulrow C
    Ann Intern Med; 2003 Dec; 139(12):1038-40. PubMed ID: 14678925
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Peer review: a constantly-evolving scientific process.
    Araújo CG
    Arq Bras Cardiol; 2012 Feb; 98(2):e32-5. PubMed ID: 22378341
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Civil, sensible, and constructive peer review in APS journals.
    Raff H; Brown D
    Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol; 2013 Aug; 305(3):R171-2. PubMed ID: 23678023
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A reviewer's lot is not a happy one.
    Raine CS
    J Neuroimmunol; 2003 Aug; 141(1-2):1-2. PubMed ID: 12965247
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Longitudinal trends in the performance of scientific peer reviewers.
    Callaham M; McCulloch C
    Ann Emerg Med; 2011 Feb; 57(2):141-8. PubMed ID: 21074894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The peer-review process of the Journal of Neurosurgery.
    Firlik KS; Firlik AD
    J Neurosurg; 1999 Feb; 90(2):364-70. PubMed ID: 9950511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Science and scholarship: ten volumes of the Journal Hospital Medicine.
    Auerbach A
    J Hosp Med; 2015 Jan; 10(1):64-6. PubMed ID: 25470813
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Lux and veritas: approaching the thorny process of peer-review and "peer-review" 2011.
    Apuzzo ML
    World Neurosurg; 2011; 76(1-2):1. PubMed ID: 21839925
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. No crisis in supply of peer reviewers.
    Vines T; Rieseberg L; Smith H
    Nature; 2010 Dec; 468(7327):1041. PubMed ID: 21179154
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Peer review is essential for both print and electronic publications.
    Weller AC
    MedGenMed; 2001 Nov; 3(4):5. PubMed ID: 11965200
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The peer-review process.
    Pearson GS
    Perspect Psychiatr Care; 2014 Apr; 50(2):77-8. PubMed ID: 24689488
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Peer review: purpose, process and publication.
    Thistlethwaite J
    Clin Teach; 2012 Aug; 9(4):201-4. PubMed ID: 22783849
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The process of a peer-reviewed journal.
    Pearson GS
    Perspect Psychiatr Care; 2013 Jul; 49(3):147-8. PubMed ID: 23819663
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Web manuscript submission and tracking system for peer review. The journal moves with the time.
    Schroeder TV; Beard JD
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2002 Feb; 23(2):95-6. PubMed ID: 11863324
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Strengthening the peer review process for the International Journal of Toxicology.
    Brock WJ
    Int J Toxicol; 2014; 33(5):351-2. PubMed ID: 25436270
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.