134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21840284)
1. Comparison of methods for calculating relative survival in population-based studies.
Rutherford MJ; Dickman PW; Lambert PC
Cancer Epidemiol; 2012 Feb; 36(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 21840284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. How to interpret the relative survival ratios of cancer patients.
Pokhrel A; Hakulinen T
Eur J Cancer; 2008 Nov; 44(17):2661-7. PubMed ID: 18819791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Up-to-date and precise estimates of cancer patient survival: model-based period analysis.
Brenner H; Hakulinen T
Am J Epidemiol; 2006 Oct; 164(7):689-96. PubMed ID: 16840519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Trends in the survival of patients diagnosed with cancer in the Nordic countries 1964-2003 followed up to the end of 2006. Material and methods.
Engholm G; Gislum M; Bray F; Hakulinen T
Acta Oncol; 2010 Jun; 49(5):545-60. PubMed ID: 20491523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Choosing the relative survival method for cancer survival estimation.
Hakulinen T; Seppä K; Lambert PC
Eur J Cancer; 2011 Sep; 47(14):2202-10. PubMed ID: 21549589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cancer net survival on registry data: use of the new unbiased Pohar-Perme estimator and magnitude of the bias with the classical methods.
Roche L; Danieli C; Belot A; Grosclaude P; Bouvier AM; Velten M; Iwaz J; Remontet L; Bossard N
Int J Cancer; 2013 May; 132(10):2359-69. PubMed ID: 22961565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Choosing the net survival method for cancer survival estimation.
Seppä K; Hakulinen T; Pokhrel A
Eur J Cancer; 2015 Jun; 51(9):1123-9. PubMed ID: 24183462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reduction in selective under-ascertainment bias in population-based estimates of cancer patient survival by age adjustment.
Brenner H; Hakulinen T
Eur J Cancer; 2005 Aug; 41(12):1788-93. PubMed ID: 16043349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Use of period analysis for providing more up-to-date estimates of long-term survival rates: empirical evaluation among 370,000 cancer patients in Finland.
Brenner H; Söderman B; Hakulinen T
Int J Epidemiol; 2002 Apr; 31(2):456-62. PubMed ID: 11980816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Trends in survival of patients diagnosed with cancers of the brain and nervous system, thyroid, eye, bone, and soft tissues in the Nordic countries 1964-2003 followed up until the end of 2006.
Bray F; Engholm G; Hakulinen T; Gislum M; Tryggvadóttir L; Storm HH; Klint A
Acta Oncol; 2010 Jun; 49(5):673-93. PubMed ID: 20192877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Period estimates of cancer patient survival are more up-to-date than complete estimates even at comparable levels of precision.
Brenner H; Hakulinen T
J Clin Epidemiol; 2006 Jun; 59(6):570-5. PubMed ID: 16713519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Model based hybrid analysis of cancer patient survival.
Brenner H; Hakulinen T
Eur J Cancer; 2007 Mar; 43(5):921-7. PubMed ID: 17329096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Substantial overestimation of standard errors of relative survival rates of cancer patients.
Brenner H; Hakulinen T
Am J Epidemiol; 2005 Apr; 161(8):781-6. PubMed ID: 15800271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An empirical evaluation of period survival analysis using data from the Canadian Cancer Registry.
Ellison LF
Ann Epidemiol; 2006 Mar; 16(3):191-6. PubMed ID: 16099673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Meta-analysis of the Italian studies on short-term effects of air pollution].
Biggeri A; Bellini P; Terracini B;
Epidemiol Prev; 2001; 25(2 Suppl):1-71. PubMed ID: 11515188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Age-standardisation of relative survival ratios of cancer patients in a comparison between countries, genders and time periods.
Pokhrel A; Hakulinen T
Eur J Cancer; 2009 Mar; 45(4):642-7. PubMed ID: 19081246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Estimating net survival: the importance of allowing for informative censoring.
Danieli C; Remontet L; Bossard N; Roche L; Belot A
Stat Med; 2012 Apr; 31(8):775-86. PubMed ID: 22281942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Interpreting international comparisons of cancer survival: the effects of incomplete registration and the presence of death certificate only cases on survival estimates.
Robinson D; Sankila R; Hakulinen T; Møller H
Eur J Cancer; 2007 Mar; 43(5):909-13. PubMed ID: 17300929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Deriving valid population-based cancer survival estimates in the presence of nonnegligible proportions of cancers notified by death certificates only.
Brenner H; Holleczek B
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2011 Dec; 20(12):2480-6. PubMed ID: 21960691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Long-term survival expectations of cancer patients in Europe in 2000-2002.
Brenner H; Francisci S; de Angelis R; Marcos-Gragera R; Verdecchia A; Gatta G; Allemani C; Ciccolallo L; Coleman M; Sant M;
Eur J Cancer; 2009 Apr; 45(6):1028-41. PubMed ID: 19091549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
