These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21841048)

  • 1. Bibliometrics and assessing performance and worth.
    Webster NR
    Br J Anaesth; 2011 Sep; 107(3):306-7. PubMed ID: 21841048
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bibliometrics of anaesthesia researchers in the UK.
    O'Leary JD
    Br J Anaesth; 2012 Jan; 108(1):164-5; author reply 165. PubMed ID: 22157456
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Measuring the unmeasurable: assessing the quality of science and scientists.
    Lüscher TF
    Eur Heart J; 2018 May; 39(20):1765-1769. PubMed ID: 29788304
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The pressure to publish pushes down quality.
    Sarewitz D
    Nature; 2016 May; 533(7602):147. PubMed ID: 27172010
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Challenging the tyranny of impact factors.
    Colquhoun D
    Nature; 2003 May; 423(6939):479; discussion 480. PubMed ID: 12774093
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Time to remodel the journal impact factor.
    Nature; 2016 Jul; 535(7613):466. PubMed ID: 27466089
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The counting house.
    Adam D
    Nature; 2002 Feb; 415(6873):726-9. PubMed ID: 11845174
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact factors: target the funding bodies.
    Insall R
    Nature; 2003 Jun; 423(6940):585. PubMed ID: 12789312
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Citation rate unrelated to journals' impact factors.
    Waheed AA
    Nature; 2003 Dec; 426(6966):495. PubMed ID: 14654813
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impact factors reward and promote excellence.
    Lomnicki A
    Nature; 2003 Jul; 424(6948):487. PubMed ID: 12891329
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The challenge of assessing the impact of science beyond bibliometrics.
    Barreto ML
    Rev Saude Publica; 2013 Aug; 47(4):834-7. PubMed ID: 24346673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Indian researchers must resist predatory open-access journals.
    Bayry J
    Nature; 2018 Nov; 563(7729):35. PubMed ID: 30382214
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A guide to the Nature Index.
    Nature; 2015 Mar; 519(7544):S75. PubMed ID: 25806700
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Introducing the Index.
    Nature; 2014 Nov; 515(7526):S52-3. PubMed ID: 25390142
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Point/Counterpoint. The future h-index is an excellent way to predict scientists' future impact.
    Acuna DE; Penner O; Orton CG
    Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):110601. PubMed ID: 24320407
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impact factors aren't top journals' sole attraction.
    Törnqvist TE
    Nature; 2003 May; 423(6939):480. PubMed ID: 12774096
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bibliometrics of anaesthesia researchers in the UK.
    Moppett IK; Hardman JG
    Br J Anaesth; 2011 Sep; 107(3):351-6. PubMed ID: 21622666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The scientific impact of nations.
    King DA
    Nature; 2004 Jul; 430(6997):311-6. PubMed ID: 15254529
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bibliometric analysis of anaesthesia journal editorial board members: correlation between journal impact factor and the median h-index of its board members.
    Pagel PS; Hudetz JA
    Br J Anaesth; 2011 Sep; 107(3):357-61. PubMed ID: 21700614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Strange results mean it's worth checking ISI data.
    Hopkins KD; Gollogly L; Ogden S; Horton R
    Nature; 2002 Feb; 415(6873):732. PubMed ID: 11845178
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.