These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21841048)
21. The h-index: a new way of assessing the scientific impact of individual CAM authors. van Haselen R Complement Ther Med; 2007 Dec; 15(4):225-7. PubMed ID: 18054723 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. The (New York) Times, They are a-Changin': The Asian Journal of Anesthesiology confronts change in medical publishing. Sun WZ; Reynolds JL Asian J Anesthesiol; 2017 Mar; 55(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 28846535 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Automated grading of research performance clearly fails to measure up. Haeffner-Cavaillon N; Graillot-Gak C; Bréchot C Nature; 2005 Dec; 438(7068):559. PubMed ID: 16319861 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Comments on the article "relative h-index to compare the scientific performance of researchers" by L.A.S. Dias. Egghe L Genet Mol Res; 2013 Jun; 12(2):1984-6. PubMed ID: 23913381 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Saudi university policy: overvalued rankings. Miley G Science; 2012 Mar; 335(6072):1041-2. PubMed ID: 22383829 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Saudi university policy: meaningful cooperation. Becker U Science; 2012 Mar; 335(6072):1041. PubMed ID: 22383828 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Saudi university policy: King Abdulaziz response. Zahed A Science; 2012 Mar; 335(6072):1040-1. PubMed ID: 22383827 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Saudi university policy: King Saud response. Al-Khedhairy AA Science; 2012 Mar; 335(6072):1040. PubMed ID: 22383826 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Playing the system to give low-impact journal more clout. Opatrný T Nature; 2008 Sep; 455(7210):167. PubMed ID: 18784703 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. What the h? Schnoor JL Environ Sci Technol; 2008 May; 42(9):3121. PubMed ID: 18522077 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Impact: China needs to review its metrics. Ma X; Song Z Nature; 2013 Nov; 503(7475):198. PubMed ID: 24226882 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics. Hicks D; Wouters P; Waltman L; de Rijcke S; Rafols I Nature; 2015 Apr; 520(7548):429-31. PubMed ID: 25903611 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Thoughts on the Bulletin. Waisel DB Bull Anesth Hist; 2013 Apr; 31(1):1. PubMed ID: 24205747 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Academic anaesthesia: the trend in UK publishing in the BJA between 2004 and 2013. Ward PA Br J Anaesth; 2014 Jul; 113(1):191-2. PubMed ID: 24942719 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Faculty cuts: University managers misled by metrics. Butts T Nature; 2014 Jul; 511(7511):534. PubMed ID: 25079545 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Achievement index climbs the ranks. Ball P Nature; 2007 Aug; 448(7155):737. PubMed ID: 17700666 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Quality versus quantity: assessing individual research performance. Sahel JA Sci Transl Med; 2011 May; 3(84):84cm13. PubMed ID: 21613620 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Measures for measures. Lehmann S; Jackson AD; Lautrup BE Nature; 2006 Dec; 444(7122):1003-4. PubMed ID: 17183295 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]