These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21841085)

  • 21. Parental selection, number of breeding populations, and size of each population in inbred development.
    Bernardo R
    Theor Appl Genet; 2003 Nov; 107(7):1252-6. PubMed ID: 12928779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Pedigree analysis and inbreeding depression on growth traits in Brazilian Marchigiana and Bonsmara breeds.
    Santana ML; Oliveira PS; Eler JP; Gutiérrez JP; Ferraz JB
    J Anim Sci; 2012 Jan; 90(1):99-108. PubMed ID: 21841079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Economic aspects of implementing genomic evaluations in a pig sire line breeding scheme.
    Tribout T; Larzul C; Phocas F
    Genet Sel Evol; 2013 Oct; 45(1):40. PubMed ID: 24127883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Selection with inbreeding control in simulated young bull schemes for local dairy cattle breeds.
    Gandini G; Stella A; Del Corvo M; Jansen GB
    J Dairy Sci; 2014 Mar; 97(3):1790-8. PubMed ID: 24440254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluation of the genetic trend of milk yield in the multiple ovulation and embryo transfer populations of dairy cows, using stochastic simulation.
    Hossein-Zadeh NG
    C R Biol; 2010 Oct; 333(10):710-5. PubMed ID: 20965440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Assessing genetic gain, inbreeding, and bias attributable to different flock genetic means in alternative sheep sire referencing schemes.
    Kuehn LA; Notter DR; Lewis RM
    J Anim Sci; 2008 Mar; 86(3):526-35. PubMed ID: 18073281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Marker-assisted selection can reduce true as well as pedigree-estimated inbreeding.
    Pedersen LD; Sørensen AC; Berg P
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 May; 92(5):2214-23. PubMed ID: 19389980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A comparison of strategies for selecting breeding pairs to maximize genetic diversity retention in managed populations.
    Ivy JA; Lacy RC
    J Hered; 2012; 103(2):186-96. PubMed ID: 22246407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Long-Term Impact of Optimum Contribution Selection Strategies on Local Livestock Breeds with Historical Introgression Using the Example of German Angler Cattle.
    Wang Y; Segelke D; Emmerling R; Bennewitz J; Wellmann R
    G3 (Bethesda); 2017 Dec; 7(12):4009-4018. PubMed ID: 29089375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [The development of the gene pool in the microevolution of Sus scrofa and the role of heterozygosity in the breed-forming process].
    Tikhonov VN
    Genetika; 2005 Apr; 41(4):566-76. PubMed ID: 15909917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Response to selection while maximizing genetic variance in small populations.
    Cervantes I; Gutiérrez JP; Meuwissen TH
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Sep; 48(1):69. PubMed ID: 27649906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Opportunities for genome-wide selection for pig breeding in developing countries.
    Akanno EC; Schenkel FS; Sargolzaei M; Friendship RM; Robinson JA
    J Anim Sci; 2013 Oct; 91(10):4617-27. PubMed ID: 24078617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Evaluation of genetic trends and determination of the optimal number of cumulative records of parity required in reproductive traits in a Large White pig population.
    Tomiyama M; Kubo S; Takagi T; Suzuki K
    Anim Sci J; 2011 Oct; 82(5):621-6. PubMed ID: 21951897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluation of the efficiency of alternative two-tier nucleus breeding systems designed to improve meat sheep in Kenya.
    Gicheha MG; Kosgey IS; Bebe BO; Kahi AK
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2006 Aug; 123(4):247-57. PubMed ID: 16882091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Validation of the QTL on SSC4 for meat and carcass quality traits in a commercial crossbred pig population.
    Sławińska A; Siwek M; Knol EF; Roelofs-Prins DT; van Wijk HJ; Dibbits B; Bednarczyk M
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2009 Feb; 126(1):43-51. PubMed ID: 19207929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effects of genomic selection on genetic improvement, inbreeding, and merit of young versus proven bulls.
    de Roos AP; Schrooten C; Veerkamp RF; van Arendonk JA
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Mar; 94(3):1559-67. PubMed ID: 21338821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Prediction of response to marker-assisted and genomic selection using selection index theory.
    Dekkers JC
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2007 Dec; 124(6):331-41. PubMed ID: 18076470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Across-family marker-assisted selection using selective genotyping strategies in dairy cattle breeding schemes.
    Ansari-Mahyari S; Sørensen AC; Lund MS; Thomsen H; Berg P
    J Dairy Sci; 2008 Apr; 91(4):1628-39. PubMed ID: 18349255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Application of selection index calculations to determine selection strategies in genomic breeding programs.
    König S; Swalve HH
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 Oct; 92(10):5292-303. PubMed ID: 19762847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Impact of genetic selection on management of boar replacement.
    Robinson JA; Buhr MM
    Theriogenology; 2005 Jan; 63(2):668-78. PubMed ID: 15626424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.