359 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21841155)
21. Nerve-sparing versus conventional laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: a minimum 12 months' follow-up study.
Bogani G; Cromi A; Uccella S; Serati M; Casarin J; Pinelli C; Nardelli F; Ghezzi F
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2014 May; 24(4):787-93. PubMed ID: 24552894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Laparotomic radical hysterectomy versus minimally invasive radical hysterectomy using vaginal colpotomy for the management of stage IB1 to IIA2 cervical cancer: Survival outcomes.
Yang EJ; Kim NR; Lee AJ; Shim SH; Lee SJ
Medicine (Baltimore); 2022 Feb; 101(8):e28911. PubMed ID: 35212297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Survival outcomes of laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy in early cervical cancer with incidentally identified high-risk factors.
Kim NR; Kim SI; Suh DH; Kim HS; Kim K; Chung HH; No JH; Kim YB; Kim JW; Park NH; Song YS; Choi CH; Lee M
Gynecol Oncol; 2023 Jul; 174():224-230. PubMed ID: 37229880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for stage IB1 cervical cancer patients with tumor size ≤ 2 cm: a case-matched control study.
Chen C; Liu P; Ni Y; Tang L; Xu Y; Bin X; Lang J
Int J Clin Oncol; 2020 May; 25(5):937-947. PubMed ID: 32062731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Robotic radical hysterectomy is superior to laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and open radical hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer.
Jin YM; Liu SS; Chen J; Chen YN; Ren CC
PLoS One; 2018; 13(3):e0193033. PubMed ID: 29554090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Radical Hysterectomy: Efficacy and Safety in the Dawn of Minimally Invasive Techniques.
Gil-Moreno A; Carbonell-Socias M; Salicrú S; Centeno-Mediavilla C; Franco-Camps S; Colas E; Oaknin A; Pérez-Benavente A; Díaz-Feijoo B
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(3):492-500. PubMed ID: 29908339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Comparison of safety and efficacy of laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in the treatment of patients with stage I a2-II b cervical cancer].
Yang L; Yang P; Li D; Cai J; Shen Y; Dong W; Zhang Y; Xiong Z; Chen H; Min J; Wang H; Wang Y; Liang W; Wang Z
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Dec; 50(12):915-22. PubMed ID: 26887875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Effect of modified radical laparoscopic hysterectomy versus open radical hysterectomy on short-term clinical outcomes in early-stage cervical cancer: a single-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial.
Lv X; Ding B; Xu J; Shen Y
World J Surg Oncol; 2023 Jun; 21(1):167. PubMed ID: 37270549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Concurrent Learning Curves of 3-Dimensional and Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer Using 2-Dimensional Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy as a Benchmark: A Single Surgeon's Experience.
Ding D; Jiang H; Nie J; Liu X; Guo SW
Med Sci Monit; 2019 Aug; 25():5903-5919. PubMed ID: 31392971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of the Long-Term Oncological Outcomes Between the Initial Learning Period of Robotic and the Experienced Period of Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer.
Chong GO; Lee YH; Lee HJ; Hong DG; Lee YS
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2018 Feb; 28(2):226-232. PubMed ID: 29303929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Minimally Invasive versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer.
Ramirez PT; Frumovitz M; Pareja R; Lopez A; Vieira M; Ribeiro R; Buda A; Yan X; Shuzhong Y; Chetty N; Isla D; Tamura M; Zhu T; Robledo KP; Gebski V; Asher R; Behan V; Nicklin JL; Coleman RL; Obermair A
N Engl J Med; 2018 Nov; 379(20):1895-1904. PubMed ID: 30380365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Prognostic value of ABO blood group in patients with early stage cervical cancer treated with radical hysterectomy with pelvic node dissection.
Hanprasertpong J; Jiamset I; Atjimakul T
Tumour Biol; 2016 Jun; 37(6):7421-30. PubMed ID: 26678885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Clinical Outcomes in Early Cervical Cancer Patients Treated with Nerve Plane-sparing Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy.
Zhao D; Li B; Wang Y; Liu S; Zhang Y; Yuan G
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(3):687-696. PubMed ID: 31075445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy in women with early stage cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Tantitamit T; Huang KG; Lee CL
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Jul; 59(4):481-488. PubMed ID: 32653117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Laparoscopic versus open abdominal management of cervical cancer: long-term results from a propensity-matched analysis.
Bogani G; Cromi A; Uccella S; Serati M; Casarin J; Pinelli C; Ghezzi F
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(5):857-62. PubMed ID: 24699300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Recurrence of Early Stage Cervical Cancer After Laparoscopic Versus Open Radical Surgery.
Laterza RM; Uccella S; Casarin J; Morosi C; Serati M; Koelbl H; Ghezzi F
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2016 Mar; 26(3):547-52. PubMed ID: 26807638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparative study on the oncological prognosis of laparoscopy and laparotomy for stage IIA1 cervical squamous cell carcinoma.
Chen C; Fang Z; Wang Q; Li W; Li P; Wang L; Kang S; Zhu B; Lin Z; Wang X; Wang L; Fan H; Bin X; Lang J; Liu P
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2021 Feb; 47(2):346-352. PubMed ID: 32859433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Surgical, Urinary, and Survival Outcomes of Nerve-sparing Versus Traditional Radical Hysterectomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study in China.
Li L; Ma S; Tan X; Zhong S; Wu M
Am J Clin Oncol; 2019 Oct; 42(10):783-788. PubMed ID: 31490195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Laparoscopic Nerve-Sparing Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Carcinoma: Emphasis on Nerve Content in Removed Cardinal Ligaments.
Shi R; Wei W; Jiang P
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2016 Jan; 26(1):192-8. PubMed ID: 26569055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Efficacy of robotic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer compared with that of open and laparoscopic surgery: A separate meta-analysis of high-quality studies.
Zhang SS; Ding T; Cui ZH; Lv Y; Jiang RA
Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Jan; 98(4):e14171. PubMed ID: 30681582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
