250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21841212)
1. A novel AIF tracking method and comparison of DCE-MRI parameters using individual and population-based AIFs in human breast cancer.
Li X; Welch EB; Arlinghaus LR; Chakravarthy AB; Xu L; Farley J; Loveless ME; Mayer IA; Kelley MC; Meszoely IM; Means-Powell JA; Abramson VG; Grau AM; Gore JC; Yankeelov TE
Phys Med Biol; 2011 Sep; 56(17):5753-69. PubMed ID: 21841212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of two methods for estimating DCE-MRI parameters via individual and cohort based AIFs in prostate cancer: a step towards practical implementation.
Fedorov A; Fluckiger J; Ayers GD; Li X; Gupta SN; Tempany C; Mulkern R; Yankeelov TE; Fennessy FM
Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 May; 32(4):321-9. PubMed ID: 24560287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reproducibility of the aortic input function (AIF) derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) of the kidneys in a volunteer study.
Mendichovszky IA; Cutajar M; Gordon I
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Sep; 71(3):576-81. PubMed ID: 19004588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment of repeatability and treatment response in early phase clinical trials using DCE-MRI: comparison of parametric analysis using MR- and CT-derived arterial input functions.
Rata M; Collins DJ; Darcy J; Messiou C; Tunariu N; Desouza N; Young H; Leach MO; Orton MR
Eur Radiol; 2016 Jul; 26(7):1991-8. PubMed ID: 26385804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Repeatability of arterial input functions and kinetic parameters in muscle obtained by dynamic contrast enhanced MR imaging of the head and neck.
Koopman T; Martens RM; Lavini C; Yaqub M; Castelijns JA; Boellaard R; Marcus JT
Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 May; 68():1-8. PubMed ID: 31978517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quantitative pharmacokinetic analysis of prostate cancer DCE-MRI at 3T: comparison of two arterial input functions on cancer detection with digitized whole mount histopathological validation.
Fennessy FM; Fedorov A; Penzkofer T; Kim KW; Hirsch MS; Vangel MG; Masry P; Flood TA; Chang MC; Tempany CM; Mulkern RV; Gupta SN
Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Sep; 33(7):886-94. PubMed ID: 25683515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of model-based arterial input functions for dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in tumor bearing rats.
McGrath DM; Bradley DP; Tessier JL; Lacey T; Taylor CJ; Parker GJ
Magn Reson Med; 2009 May; 61(5):1173-84. PubMed ID: 19253360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A model-constrained Monte Carlo method for blind arterial input function estimation in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: II. In vivo results.
Schabel MC; DiBella EV; Jensen RL; Salzman KL
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Aug; 55(16):4807-23. PubMed ID: 20679695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of arterial input function selection on the accuracy of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI quantitative analysis for the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer.
Azahaf M; Haberlay M; Betrouni N; Ernst O; Behal H; Duhamel A; Ouzzane A; Puech P
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Mar; 43(3):737-49. PubMed ID: 26303794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Automatic individual arterial input functions calculated from PCA outperform manual and population-averaged approaches for the pharmacokinetic modeling of DCE-MR images.
Sanz-Requena R; Prats-Montalbán JM; Martí-Bonmatí L; Alberich-Bayarri Á; García-Martí G; Pérez R; Ferrer A
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Aug; 42(2):477-87. PubMed ID: 25410482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reproducibility assessment of a multiple reference tissue method for quantitative dynamic contrast enhanced-MRI analysis.
Yang C; Karczmar GS; Medved M; Oto A; Zamora M; Stadler WM
Magn Reson Med; 2009 Apr; 61(4):851-9. PubMed ID: 19185002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Feasibility of using limited-population-based arterial input function for pharmacokinetic modeling of osteosarcoma dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI data.
Wang Y; Huang W; Panicek DM; Schwartz LH; Koutcher JA
Magn Reson Med; 2008 May; 59(5):1183-9. PubMed ID: 18429032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison between population average and experimentally measured arterial input function in predicting biopsy results in prostate cancer.
Meng R; Chang SD; Jones EC; Goldenberg SL; Kozlowski P
Acad Radiol; 2010 Apr; 17(4):520-5. PubMed ID: 20074982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Model-based blind estimation of kinetic parameters in dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE)-MRI.
Fluckiger JU; Schabel MC; Dibella EV
Magn Reson Med; 2009 Dec; 62(6):1477-86. PubMed ID: 19859949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Improving the arterial input function in dynamic contrast enhanced MRI by fitting the signal in the complex plane.
Simonis FF; Sbrizzi A; Beld E; Lagendijk JJ; van den Berg CA
Magn Reson Med; 2016 Oct; 76(4):1236-45. PubMed ID: 26525012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Automatic determination of arterial input function for dynamic contrast enhanced MRI in tumor assessment.
Chen J; Yao J; Thomasson D
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2008; 11(Pt 1):594-601. PubMed ID: 18979795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of DCE-MRI parameters for brain tumors through implementation of physiologically-based pharmacokinetic model approaches for Gd-DOTA.
Spanakis M; Kontopodis E; Van Cauter S; Sakkalis V; Marias K
J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2016 Oct; 43(5):529-47. PubMed ID: 27647272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Blind estimation of the arterial input function in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI using purity maximization.
Lin YC; Chan TH; Chi CY; Ng SH; Liu HL; Wei KC; Wai YY; Wang CC; Wang JJ
Magn Reson Med; 2012 Nov; 68(5):1439-49. PubMed ID: 22383386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment of the effect of haematocrit-dependent arterial input functions on the accuracy of pharmacokinetic parameters in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.
Just N; Koh DM; D'Arcy J; Collins DJ; Leach MO
NMR Biomed; 2011 Aug; 24(7):902-15. PubMed ID: 21290457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Multiple reference tissue method for contrast agent arterial input function estimation.
Yang C; Karczmar GS; Medved M; Stadler WM
Magn Reson Med; 2007 Dec; 58(6):1266-75. PubMed ID: 17969061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
