BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21841266)

  • 1. Intercanine distance in the analysis of bite marks: a comparison of human and domestic dog dental arches.
    Tedeschi-Oliveira SV; Trigueiro M; Oliveira RN; Melani RF
    J Forensic Odontostomatol; 2011 Jul; 29(1):30-36. PubMed ID: 21841266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Spacing in deciduous dentition of Polish children in relation to tooth size and dental arch dimensions.
    Janiszewska-Olszowska J; Stepien P; Syrynska M
    Arch Oral Biol; 2009 May; 54(5):397-402. PubMed ID: 19251244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Canine tip marker: a simplified tool for measuring intercanine distance.
    Tripathi S; Aeran H; Yadav S; Singh SP; Singh RD; Chand P
    J Prosthodont; 2011 Jul; 20(5):391-8. PubMed ID: 21627709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An integrated technique for the analysis of skin bite marks.
    Bernitz H; Owen JH; van Heerden WF; Solheim T
    J Forensic Sci; 2008 Jan; 53(1):194-8. PubMed ID: 18279256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An analysis of dental intercanine distance for use in court cases involving bite marks.
    Reinprecht S; van Staden PJ; Jordaan J; Bernitz H
    Int J Legal Med; 2017 Mar; 131(2):459-464. PubMed ID: 27924405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Forensic value of human bite marks in tooth position anomalies (III)].
    Hennis I; Schienbein H; Scholl E
    Quintessenz; 1981 Dec; 32(12):2349-60. PubMed ID: 6953488
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Forensic value of human bite marks in tooth position anomalies (II)].
    Hennis I; Schienbein H; Scholl E
    Quintessenz; 1981 Nov; 32(11):2141-50. PubMed ID: 6953479
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dental arch diameters and relationships to oral habits.
    Aznar T; Galán AF; Marín I; Domínguez A
    Angle Orthod; 2006 May; 76(3):441-5. PubMed ID: 16637724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Analysis of intra-arch and interarch measurements from digital models with 2 impression materials and a modeling process based on cone-beam computed tomography.
    White AJ; Fallis DW; Vandewalle KS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Apr; 137(4):456.e1-9; discussion 456-7. PubMed ID: 20362900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Lingual markings of anterior teeth as seen in human bite marks.
    Sperber ND
    J Forensic Sci; 1990 Jul; 35(4):838-44. PubMed ID: 2131792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A study on tooth marks (Part 2)--On the reproducibility and identification of tooth marks by means of a three-dimensional measuring instrument.
    Innami T; Kimura T; Tsunoda R; Takizawa N; Ikeya T; Endo H; Ohki M; Takahashi T; Takei T
    J Nihon Univ Sch Dent; 1985 Dec; 27(4):233-46. PubMed ID: 3867740
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Comparison of bite marks and teeth features using 2D and 3D methods].
    Lorkiewicz-Muszyńska D; Glapiński M; Zaba C; Łabecka M
    Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2011; 61(2):107-14. PubMed ID: 22390125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prediction of arch length based on intercanine width.
    Paulino V; Paredes V; Gandia JL; Cibrian R
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Jun; 30(3):295-8. PubMed ID: 18263887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quantitative forensic evaluation of bite marks with the aid of a shape analysis computer program: Part 2; "SCIP" and bite marks in skin and foodstuffs.
    Nambiar P; Bridges TE; Brown KA
    J Forensic Odontostomatol; 1995 Dec; 13(2):26-32. PubMed ID: 9227071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of the bite mark pattern and intercanine distance between humans and dogs.
    Kashyap B; Anand S; Reddy S; Sahukar SB; Supriya N; Pasupuleti S
    J Forensic Dent Sci; 2015; 7(3):175-9. PubMed ID: 26816456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cave canem: bite mark analysis in a fatal dog pack attack.
    Pomara C; D'Errico S; Jarussi V; Turillazzi E; Fineschi V
    Am J Forensic Med Pathol; 2011 Mar; 32(1):50-4. PubMed ID: 20661123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quantitative forensic evaluation of bite marks with the aid of a shape analysis computer program: Part 1; The development of "SCIP" and the similarity index.
    Nambiar P; Bridges TE; Brown KA
    J Forensic Odontostomatol; 1995 Dec; 13(2):18-25. PubMed ID: 9227070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bite mark evidence.
    Dorion RB
    J Can Dent Assoc; 1982 Dec; 48(12):795-8. PubMed ID: 6760951
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of dental arch measurements in the primary dentition between contemporary and historic samples.
    Warren JJ; Bishara SE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Mar; 119(3):211-5. PubMed ID: 11244414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Analysis of Intercanine Distance and Dimensional Changes in Bite Marks on Foodstuffs Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography.
    Ali IK; Sansare K; Karjodkar FR
    Am J Forensic Med Pathol; 2018 Sep; 39(3):213-217. PubMed ID: 29652674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.