604 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21841982)
21. Three-dimensional accuracy of CAD/CAM titanium and ceramic superstructures for implant abutments using spiral scan microtomography.
Prasad R; Al-Kheraif AA
Int J Prosthodont; 2013; 26(5):451-7. PubMed ID: 23998143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. In vivo stress behavior in cemented and screw-retained five-unit implant FPDs.
Karl M; Taylor TD; Wichmann MG; Heckmann SM
J Prosthodont; 2006; 15(1):20-4. PubMed ID: 16433647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Effect of various fixation parameters on strain development of screw- and cement-retained implant-supported restorations.
Schittenhelm B; Karl M; Graef F; Heckmann S; Taylor T
Quintessence Int; 2013; 44(6):409-16. PubMed ID: 23534049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Evaluation of gold-machined UCLA-type abutments and CAD/CAM titanium abutments with hexagonal external connection and with internal connection.
Vigolo P; Fonzi F; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(2):247-52. PubMed ID: 18548920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Marginal accuracy of four-unit zirconia fixed dental prostheses fabricated using different computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing systems.
Kohorst P; Brinkmann H; Li J; Borchers L; Stiesch M
Eur J Oral Sci; 2009 Jun; 117(3):319-25. PubMed ID: 19583762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Maintenance of implant-supported maxillary prostheses: a 2-year controlled clinical trial.
Katsoulis J; Brunner A; Mericske-Stern R
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(3):648-56. PubMed ID: 21691613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. In vitro evaluation of reverse torque value of abutment screw and marginal opening in a screw- and cement-retained implant fixed partial denture design.
Kim SG; Park JU; Jeong JH; Bae C; Bae TS; Chee W
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(6):1061-7. PubMed ID: 20162110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Torque loss under mechanical cycling of long-span zirconia and titanium-cemented and screw-retained implant-supported CAD/CAM frameworks.
Gomes ÉA; Tiossi R; Faria AC; Rodrigues RC; Ribeiro RF
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Dec; 25(12):1395-402. PubMed ID: 25539006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Evaluation of a new method to achieve optimal passivity of implant-supported superstructures.
Goossens IC; Herbst D
SADJ; 2003 Aug; 58(7):279-85, 287. PubMed ID: 14649041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Zirconium dioxide based dental restorations. Studies on clinical performance and fracture behaviour.
Larsson C
Swed Dent J Suppl; 2011; (213):9-84. PubMed ID: 21919311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A comparison of fit of CNC-milled titanium and zirconia frameworks to implants.
Abduo J; Lyons K; Waddell N; Bennani V; Swain M
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 May; 14 Suppl 1():e20-9. PubMed ID: 21414138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparative evaluation of BioHPP and titanium as a framework veneered with composite resin for implant-supported fixed dental prostheses.
Jin HY; Teng MH; Wang ZJ; Li X; Liang JY; Wang WX; Jiang S; Zhao BD
J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Oct; 122(4):383-388. PubMed ID: 30982624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Strength of CAD/CAM-generated esthetic ceramic molar implant crowns.
Wolf D; Bindl A; Schmidlin PR; Lüthy H; Mörmann WH
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(4):609-17. PubMed ID: 18807555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Marginal fit and photoelastic stress analysis of CAD-CAM and overcast 3-unit implant-supported frameworks.
Presotto AG; Bhering CL; Mesquita MF; Barão VA
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Mar; 117(3):373-379. PubMed ID: 27666497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Fracture load of composite resin and feldspathic all-ceramic CAD/CAM crowns.
Attia A; Abdelaziz KM; Freitag S; Kern M
J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Feb; 95(2):117-23. PubMed ID: 16473085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. In vitro effect of load cycling on metal-ceramic cement- and screw-retained implant restorations.
Karl M; Graef F; Taylor TD; Heckmann SM
J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Mar; 97(3):137-40. PubMed ID: 17394911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Volumetric misfit in CAD/CAM and cast implant frameworks: a university laboratory study.
Almasri R; Drago CJ; Siegel SC; Hardigan PC
J Prosthodont; 2011 Jun; 20(4):267-74. PubMed ID: 21492296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. CAD/CAM fabrication accuracy of long- vs. short-span implant-supported FDPs.
Katsoulis J; Müller P; Mericske-Stern R; Blatz MB
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 Mar; 26(3):245-9. PubMed ID: 25363301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Volumetric determination of the amount of misfit in CAD/CAM and cast implant frameworks: a multicenter laboratory study.
Drago C; Saldarriaga RL; Domagala D; Almasri R
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(5):920-9. PubMed ID: 20862405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Effect of materials and superstructure designs on the passive fit of implant-supported fixed prostheses].
Song S; Zheng Z; Yang LY; Gao X
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Feb; 37(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 30854816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
