These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

609 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21841982)

  • 61. Marginal fit of implant-supported all-ceramic zirconia frameworks.
    Zaghloul HH; Younis JF
    J Oral Implantol; 2013 Aug; 39(4):417-24. PubMed ID: 23964776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Effect of engaging abutment position in implant-borne, screw-retained three-unit fixed cantilevered prostheses.
    Dogus SM; Kurtz KS; Watanabe I; Griggs JA
    J Prosthodont; 2011 Jul; 20(5):348-54. PubMed ID: 21585587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Three-dimensional image correlation analyses for strains generated by cement and screw-retained implant prostheses.
    Clelland NL; Yilmaz B; Seidt JD
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2013 Apr; 15(2):271-82. PubMed ID: 22171595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Impression techniques and misfit-induced strains on implant-supported superstructures: an in vitro study.
    Cehreli MC; Akça K
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2006 Aug; 26(4):379-85. PubMed ID: 16939020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Comparison of marginal and internal fit of press-on-metal and conventional ceramic systems for three- and four-unit implant-supported partial fixed dental prostheses: An in vitro study.
    Bayramoğlu E; Özkan YK; Yildiz C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jul; 114(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 25858218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. The effects of abutment taper, length and cement type on resistance to dislodgement of cement-retained, implant-supported restorations.
    Bernal G; Okamura M; Muñoz CA
    J Prosthodont; 2003 Jun; 12(2):111-5. PubMed ID: 12964683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Effect of modifying the screw access channels of zirconia implant abutment on the cement flow pattern and retention of zirconia restorations.
    Wadhwani C; Chung KH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Jul; 112(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 24680357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Improving the fit of implant prosthetics: an in vitro study.
    Yannikakis S; Prombonas A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(1):126-34. PubMed ID: 23377057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Influence of the veneering process on the marginal fit of zirconia fixed dental prostheses.
    Kohorst P; Brinkmann H; Dittmer MP; Borchers L; Stiesch M
    J Oral Rehabil; 2010 Apr; 37(4):283-91. PubMed ID: 20059649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. CAD/CAM systems available for the fabrication of crown and bridge restorations.
    Miyazaki T; Hotta Y
    Aust Dent J; 2011 Jun; 56 Suppl 1():97-106. PubMed ID: 21564120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. In vitro stress analyses of dental implants supporting screw-retained and cement-retained prostheses.
    Kim WD; Jacobson Z; Nathanson D
    Implant Dent; 1999; 8(2):141-51. PubMed ID: 10635156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Fracture load of milled polymeric fixed dental prostheses as a function of connector cross-sectional areas.
    Wimmer T; Ender A; Roos M; Stawarczyk B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Oct; 110(4):288-95. PubMed ID: 24079564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Dimensional accuracy and retentive strength of a retrievable cement-retained implant-supported prosthesis.
    Randi AP; Hsu AT; Verga A; Kim JJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(4):547-56. PubMed ID: 11516002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Digital data acquisition for a CAD/CAM-fabricated titanium framework and zirconium oxide restorations for an implant-supported fixed complete dental prosthesis.
    Lin WS; Metz MJ; Pollini A; Ntounis A; Morton D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Dec; 112(6):1324-9. PubMed ID: 25258258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Fabrication of the mandibular implant-supported fixed restoration using CAD/CAM technology: a clinical report.
    Reshad M; Cascione D; Aalam AA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Nov; 102(5):271-8. PubMed ID: 19853167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Marginal discrepancy of CAD-CAM complete-arch fixed implant-supported frameworks.
    Yilmaz B; Kale E; Johnston WM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Jul; 120(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 29475755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. In vitro study of the influence of the type of connection on the fracture load of zirconia abutments with internal and external implant-abutment connections.
    Sailer I; Sailer T; Stawarczyk B; Jung RE; Hämmerle CH
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):850-8. PubMed ID: 19865625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Effects of thermocycling on the retention of various cements of one-unit and three-unit fixed implant-supported restorations.
    Uludamar A; Ozkan Y; Ozkan YK
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(3):567-76. PubMed ID: 22616050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Effect of superstructure materials and misfit on stress distribution in a single implant-supported prosthesis: a finite element analysis.
    Assunção WG; Gomes EA; Barão VA; Delben JA; Tabata LF; de Sousa EA
    J Craniofac Surg; 2010 May; 21(3):689-95. PubMed ID: 20485030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Fracture load of tooth-implant-retained zirconia ceramic fixed dental prostheses: effect of span length and preparation design.
    Gabbert O; Karatzogiannis E; Ohlmann B; Schmitter M; Karl J; Rammelsberg P
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Jun; 23(6):719-725. PubMed ID: 21812819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 31.