176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21841992)
1. Failure rates of short (≤ 10 mm) dental implants and factors influencing their failure: a systematic review.
Sun HL; Huang C; Wu YR; Shi B
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):816-25. PubMed ID: 21841992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Survival rates of short (6 mm) micro-rough surface implants: a review of literature and meta-analysis.
Srinivasan M; Vazquez L; Rieder P; Moraguez O; Bernard JP; Belser UC
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 May; 25(5):539-45. PubMed ID: 23413956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A prospective multicenter clinical trial of 3i machined-surface implants: results after 6 years of follow-up.
Weng D; Jacobson Z; Tarnow D; Hürzeler MB; Faehn O; Sanavi F; Barkvoll P; Stach RM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(3):417-23. PubMed ID: 12814318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A targeted review of study outcomes with short (< or = 7 mm) endosseous dental implants placed in partially edentulous patients.
Hagi D; Deporter DA; Pilliar RM; Arenovich T
J Periodontol; 2004 Jun; 75(6):798-804. PubMed ID: 15295944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A multi-center study comparing dual acid-etched and machined-surfaced implants in various bone qualities.
Khang W; Feldman S; Hawley CE; Gunsolley J
J Periodontol; 2001 Oct; 72(10):1384-90. PubMed ID: 11699480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Short implants--an analysis of longitudinal studies.
das Neves FD; Fones D; Bernardes SR; do Prado CJ; Neto AJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(1):86-93. PubMed ID: 16519186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In selected sites, short, rough-surfaced dental implants are as successful as long dental implants: a critical summary of Pommer B, Frantal S, Willer J, Posch M, Watzek G, Tepper G. Impact of dental implant length on early failure rates: a meta-analysis of observational studies. J Clin Periodontol 2011;38(9):856-863.
Balevi B
J Am Dent Assoc; 2013 Feb; 144(2):195-6. PubMed ID: 23372136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Descriptive analysis of implant and prosthodontic survival rates with fixed implant-supported rehabilitations in the edentulous maxilla.
Lambert FE; Weber HP; Susarla SM; Belser UC; Gallucci GO
J Periodontol; 2009 Aug; 80(8):1220-30. PubMed ID: 19656021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of endosseous dental implant surfaces.
Cochran DL
J Periodontol; 1999 Dec; 70(12):1523-39. PubMed ID: 10632528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of maxillary sinus augmentation on the survival of endosseous dental implants. A systematic review.
Wallace SS; Froum SJ
Ann Periodontol; 2003 Dec; 8(1):328-43. PubMed ID: 14971260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical field trial examining an implant with a sand-blasted, acid-etched surface.
Cochran D; Oates T; Morton D; Jones A; Buser D; Peters F
J Periodontol; 2007 Jun; 78(6):974-82. PubMed ID: 17539708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Survival of turned and roughened dental implants in irradiated head and neck cancer patients: a retrospective analysis.
Buddula A; Assad DA; Salinas TJ; Garces YI; Volz JE; Weaver AL
J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Nov; 106(5):290-6. PubMed ID: 22024178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Survival of short implants is improved with greater implant length, placement in the mandible compared with the maxilla, and in nonsmokers.
Carr AB
J Evid Based Dent Pract; 2012 Sep; 12(3 Suppl):189-91. PubMed ID: 23253845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Short implants placed one-stage in maxillae and mandibles: a retrospective clinical study with 1 to 9 years of follow-up.
Maló P; de Araújo Nobre M; Rangert B
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2007 Mar; 9(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 17362493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A long-term retrospective study of two different implant surfaces placed after reconstruction of the severely resorbed maxilla using Le Fort I osteotomy and interpositional bone grafting.
Marchetti C; Pieri F; Corinaldesi G; Degidi M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(5):911-8. PubMed ID: 19014162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of diameter and length of implant on early dental implant failure.
Olate S; Lyrio MC; de Moraes M; Mazzonetto R; Moreira RW
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Feb; 68(2):414-9. PubMed ID: 20116716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Survival of dental implants in native and grafted bone in irradiated head and neck cancer patients: a retrospective analysis.
Buddula A; Assad DA; Salinas TJ; Garces YI
Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(5):644-8. PubMed ID: 22406706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A prospective multicenter clinical study of the Osseotite implant: four-year interim report.
Testori T; Wiseman L; Woolfe S; Porter SS
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(2):193-200. PubMed ID: 11324207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Three-year analysis of zirconia implants used for single-tooth replacement and three-unit fixed dental prostheses: A prospective multicenter study.
Balmer M; Spies BC; Vach K; Kohal RJ; Hämmerle CHF; Jung RE
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Mar; 29(3):290-299. PubMed ID: 29330869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Oral rehabilitation with implant-supported fixed partial dentures in periodontitis-susceptible subjects. A 5-year prospective study.
Wennström JL; Ekestubbe A; Gröndahl K; Karlsson S; Lindhe J
J Clin Periodontol; 2004 Sep; 31(9):713-24. PubMed ID: 15312092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
