These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2184226)

  • 41. Accuracy of impression materials for complete-arch fixed partial dentures.
    Lin CC; Ziebert GJ; Donegan SJ; Dhuru VB
    J Prosthet Dent; 1988 Mar; 59(3):288-91. PubMed ID: 3279184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Effects of a chemical disinfectant on the physical properties of dental stones.
    Hall BD; Muñoz-Viveros CA; Naylor WP; Sy J
    Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(1):65-71. PubMed ID: 15008235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Using silicone impression material and acrylic resin to fabricate remount casts for removable partial dentures.
    Hsu YT; Farmer JB
    J Prosthodont; 2005 Jun; 14(2):137-40. PubMed ID: 16011626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Immersion disinfection of irreversible hydrocolloid impressions in pH-adjusted sodium hypochlorite. Part 2: Effect on gypsum casts.
    Hutchings ML; Vandewalle KS; Schwartz RS; Charlton DG
    Int J Prosthodont; 1996; 9(3):223-9. PubMed ID: 8957856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Distortion analysis of stone casts made from impression materials.
    Linke BA; Nicholls JI; Faucher RR
    J Prosthet Dent; 1985 Dec; 54(6):794-802. PubMed ID: 3908660
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Irreversible hydrocolloid impressions for full-banded orthodontic patients.
    Drago CJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 1985 Sep; 54(3):372-3. PubMed ID: 3906092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Occlusal registrations using alginate (irreversible hydrocolloid) impression material.
    Scott WR
    J Prosthet Dent; 1978 Nov; 40(5):517-9. PubMed ID: 281501
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Evaluation of accuracy of multiple dental implant impressions using various splinting materials.
    Hariharan R; Shankar C; Rajan M; Baig MR; Azhagarasan NS
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 20209185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Compatibility of elastomeric impression materials for use as soft tissue casts.
    Beyak BL; Chee WW
    J Prosthet Dent; 1996 Nov; 76(5):510-4. PubMed ID: 8933441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Qualitative and quantitative three-dimensional accuracy of a single tooth captured by elastomeric impression materials: an in vitro study.
    Schaefer O; Schmidt M; Goebel R; Kuepper H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Sep; 108(3):165-72. PubMed ID: 22944312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Comparison of Maximum Intercuspal Contacts of Articulated Casts and Virtual Casts Requiring Posterior Fixed Partial Dentures.
    Arslan Y; Bankoğlu Güngör M; Karakoca Nemli S; Kökdoğan Boyacı B; Aydın C
    J Prosthodont; 2017 Oct; 26(7):594-598. PubMed ID: 26848940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Dimensional and occlusal accuracy of a novel three-dimensional digital model of articulated dental arches.
    Tanaka Y; Hattori Y
    Int J Prosthodont; 2013; 26(3):282-7. PubMed ID: 23626985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Dimensional accuracy of resultant casts made by a monophase, one-step and two-step, and a novel two-step putty/light-body impression technique: an in vitro study.
    Caputi S; Varvara G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Apr; 99(4):274-81. PubMed ID: 18395537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The dimensional accuracy of four impression techniques with the use of addition silicone impression materials.
    Al-Bakri IA; Hussey D; Al-Omari WM
    J Clin Dent; 2007; 18(2):29-33. PubMed ID: 17508620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Survey of prosthodontic impression procedures for complete dentures in general dental practice in the United Kingdom.
    Hyde TP; McCord JF
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 Mar; 81(3):295-9. PubMed ID: 10050117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Evaluation of the occlusal contact of crowns fabricated with the bite impression method.
    Makino S; Okada D; Shin C; Ogura R; Ikeda M; Miura H
    J Med Dent Sci; 2013 Sep; 60(3):73-81. PubMed ID: 24146169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Accuracy of 2 impression techniques for ITI implants.
    Akça K; Cehreli MC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(4):517-23. PubMed ID: 15346748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. An Investigation into the Accuracy of Two Currently Available Dental Impression Materials in the Construction of Cobalt-Chromium Frameworks for Removable Partial Dentures.
    Dubal RK; Friel T; Taylor PD
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2015 Mar; 23(1):16-28. PubMed ID: 26415334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Matrices in metal ceramics.
    Kucey BK
    J Prosthet Dent; 1990 Jan; 63(1):32-7. PubMed ID: 2295986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Pressure generated on a simulated oral analog by impression materials in custom trays of different designs.
    Masri R; Driscoll CF; Burkhardt J; Von Fraunhofer A; Romberg E
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Sep; 11(3):155-60. PubMed ID: 12237795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.