These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2184229)

  • 1. An evaluation of impression techniques for osseointegrated implants.
    Spector MR; Donovan TE; Nicholls JI
    J Prosthet Dent; 1990 Apr; 63(4):444-7. PubMed ID: 2184229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of dimensional accuracy between three different addition cured silicone impression materials.
    Forrester-Baker L; Seymour KG; Samarawickrama D; Zou L; Cherukara G; Patel M
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2005 Jun; 13(2):69-74. PubMed ID: 16011234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of the precision of three implant transfer impression techniques using two elastomeric impression materials.
    Mostafa TM; Elgendy MN; Kashef NA; Halim MM
    Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(6):525-8. PubMed ID: 21209987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fabricating a stable record base for completely edentulous patients treated with osseointegrated implants using healing abutments.
    Rungcharassaeng K; Kan JY
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 Feb; 81(2):224-7. PubMed ID: 9922438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An alternative technique for the accurate transfer of periimplant soft tissue contour.
    Man Y; Qu Y; Dam HG; Gong P
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Feb; 109(2):135-7. PubMed ID: 23395340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An implant impression technique using a plaster splinting index combined with a silicone impression.
    Eid N
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Dec; 92(6):575-7. PubMed ID: 15583565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy of different impression techniques for internal-connection implants.
    Lee YJ; Heo SJ; Koak JY; Kim SK
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):823-30. PubMed ID: 19865622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy of replacing three tapered transfer impression copings in two elastomeric impression materials.
    Liou AD; Nicholls JI; Yuodelis RA; Brudvik JS
    Int J Prosthodont; 1993; 6(4):377-83. PubMed ID: 8240649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of accuracy of complete-arch multiple-unit abutment-level dental implant impressions using different impression and splinting materials.
    Buzayan M; Baig MR; Yunus N
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(6):1512-20. PubMed ID: 24278919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Impression technics in implantology].
    Vanheusden A
    Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 2001; 56(3):189-203. PubMed ID: 16193852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of 2 impression techniques on the dimensional accuracy of working implant prosthesis models: an in vitro study.
    Calesini G; Zarone F; Sorrentino R; Micarelli C; Fabianelli A; Papacchini F; Gherlone E
    J Craniofac Surg; 2014 May; 25(3):822-7. PubMed ID: 24820709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A laboratory investigation of the accuracy of the repositioning impression coping technique at the implant level for single-tooth implants.
    Daoudi MF; Setchell DJ; Searson LJ
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2003 Mar; 11(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 12705035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Distortion analysis of stone casts made from impression materials.
    Linke BA; Nicholls JI; Faucher RR
    J Prosthet Dent; 1985 Dec; 54(6):794-802. PubMed ID: 3908660
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of the dimensional accuracy of one- and two-step techniques with the use of putty/wash addition silicone impression materials.
    Idris B; Houston F; Claffey N
    J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Nov; 74(5):535-41. PubMed ID: 8809262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of implant angulation, impression material, and variation in arch curvature width on implant transfer model accuracy.
    Akalin ZF; Ozkan YK; Ekerim A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(1):149-57. PubMed ID: 23377060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Digital evaluation of the accuracy of impression techniques and materials in angulated implants.
    Kurtulmus-Yilmaz S; Ozan O; Ozcelik TB; Yagiz A
    J Dent; 2014 Dec; 42(12):1551-9. PubMed ID: 25446736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Elastomeric impression materials].
    Tsoutsos A; Doukoudakis A; Hottel T
    Odontostomatol Proodos; 1985; 39(4):261-6. PubMed ID: 3939456
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of the accuracy of three techniques used for multiple implant abutment impressions.
    Vigolo P; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Feb; 89(2):186-92. PubMed ID: 12616240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of subgingival depth of implant placement on the dimensional accuracy of the implant impression: an in vitro study.
    Lee H; Ercoli C; Funkenbusch PD; Feng C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):107-13. PubMed ID: 18262011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A simplified impression technique for dental implants.
    Vogel RE
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2002 Mar; 23(3 Suppl 1):13-6. PubMed ID: 11913312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.