197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21842580)
41. Subharmonic response of encapsulated microbubbles: conditions for existence and amplification.
Kimmel E; Krasovitski B; Hoogi A; Razansky D; Adam D
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2007 Nov; 33(11):1767-76. PubMed ID: 17720301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Correlation Between Portal Vein Pressure and Subharmonic Scattering Signals From SonoVue Microbubbles in Canines.
Lu H; Xu G; Wang Y; Yang H; Li D; Huang L; Su M; Li C; Qiu W; Mao Y; Yu W; Li F
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2023 Jan; 49(1):203-211. PubMed ID: 36266141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Ultrasonic characterization of the nonlinear properties of contrast microbubbles.
Shi WT; Forsberg F
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2000 Jan; 26(1):93-104. PubMed ID: 10687797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Nonlinear emission from individual bound microbubbles at high frequencies.
Sprague MR; Chérin E; Goertz DE; Foster FS
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2010 Feb; 36(2):313-24. PubMed ID: 20018429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Phantom evaluation of stacked-type dual-frequency 1-3 composite transducers: A feasibility study on intracavitary acoustic angiography.
Kim J; Li S; Kasoji S; Dayton PA; Jiang X
Ultrasonics; 2015 Dec; 63():7-15. PubMed ID: 26112426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Enhancement of subharmonic emission from encapsulated microbubbles by using a chirp excitation technique.
Zhang D; Gong Y; Gong X; Liu Z; Tan K; Zheng H
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Sep; 52(18):5531-44. PubMed ID: 17804880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Subharmonic imaging with microbubble contrast agents: initial results.
Shi WT; Forsberg F; Hall AL; Chiao RY; Liu JB; Miller S; Thomenius KE; Wheatley MA; Goldberg BB
Ultrason Imaging; 1999 Apr; 21(2):79-94. PubMed ID: 10485563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Stable and transient subharmonic emissions from isolated contrast agent microbubbles.
Biagi E; Breschi L; Vannacci E; Masotti L
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2007 Mar; 54(3):480-97. PubMed ID: 17375818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Experimental acoustic characterization of an endoskeletal antibubble contrast agent: First results.
Panfilova A; Chen P; van Sloun RJG; Wijkstra H; Postema M; Poortinga AT; Mischi M
Med Phys; 2021 Nov; 48(11):6765-6780. PubMed ID: 34580883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Effect of self-demodulation on the subharmonic response of contrast agent microbubbles.
Daeichin V; Faez T; Renaud G; Bosch JG; van der Steen AF; de Jong N
Phys Med Biol; 2012 Jun; 57(12):3675-91. PubMed ID: 22614693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Determination of postexcitation thresholds for single ultrasound contrast agent microbubbles using double passive cavitation detection.
King DA; Malloy MJ; Roberts AC; Haak A; Yoder CC; O'Brien WD
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jun; 127(6):3449-55. PubMed ID: 20550244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Modeling subharmonic response from contrast microbubbles as a function of ambient static pressure.
Katiyar A; Sarkar K; Forsberg F
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Apr; 129(4):2325-35. PubMed ID: 21476688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Nonlinear intravascular ultrasound contrast imaging.
Goertz DE; Frijlink ME; de Jong N; van der Steen AF
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2006 Apr; 32(4):491-502. PubMed ID: 16616596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. An Improved CMUT Structure Enabling Release and Collapse of the Plate in the Same Tx/Rx Cycle for Dual-Frequency Acoustic Angiography.
Mahmud MM; Wu X; Sanders JL; Biliroglu AO; Adelegan OJ; Newsome IG; Yamaner FY; Dayton PA; Oralkan O
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2020 Nov; 67(11):2291-2302. PubMed ID: 32746179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. High frequency nonlinear B-scan imaging of microbubble contrast agents.
Goertz DE; Cherin E; Needles A; Karshafian R; Brown AS; Burns PN; Foster FS
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2005 Jan; 52(1):65-79. PubMed ID: 15742563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. High frequency nonlinear scattering from a micrometer to submicrometer sized lipid encapsulated contrast agent.
Goertz DE; Frijlink ME; de Jong N; van der Steen AF
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2006 Apr; 32(4):569-77. PubMed ID: 16616602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Impact of acoustic pressure on ambient pressure estimation using ultrasound contrast agent.
Andersen KS; Jensen JA
Ultrasonics; 2010 Feb; 50(2):294-9. PubMed ID: 19822339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Biomechanical characteristics in the carotid artery: Noninvasive assessment using subharmonic emissions from microbubbles.
Li R; Zhang Y; Zheng S; Zhang W; Du K; He W; Zhang W
Med Phys; 2023 Nov; 50(11):6857-6863. PubMed ID: 37337456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. The effect of amplitude modulation on subharmonic imaging with chirp excitation.
Harput S; Arif M; McLaughlan J; Cowell DM; Freear S
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2013 Dec; 60(12):2532-44. PubMed ID: 24297019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. In vitro characterization of the subharmonic ultrasound signal from Definity microbubbles at high frequencies.
Cheung K; Couture O; Bevan PD; Cherin E; Williams R; Burns PN; Foster FS
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Mar; 53(5):1209-23. PubMed ID: 18296758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
