These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21842998)
1. Numbers can be worth a thousand pictures: individual differences in understanding graphical and numerical representations of health-related information. Gaissmaier W; Wegwarth O; Skopec D; Müller AS; Broschinski S; Politi MC Health Psychol; 2012 May; 31(3):286-96. PubMed ID: 21842998 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Lure of Beauty: People Select Representations of Statistical Information Largely Based on Attractiveness, Not Comprehensibility. Gaissmaier W; Tiede KE; Garcia-Retamero R Med Decis Making; 2023; 43(7-8):774-788. PubMed ID: 37872798 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Communicating global cardiovascular risk: are icon arrays better than numerical estimates in improving understanding, recall and perception of risk? Ruiz JG; Andrade AD; Garcia-Retamero R; Anam R; Rodriguez R; Sharit J Patient Educ Couns; 2013 Dec; 93(3):394-402. PubMed ID: 23916416 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. How Do People Process Different Representations of Statistical Information? Insights into Cognitive Effort, Representational Inconsistencies, and Individual Differences. Tiede KE; Gaissmaier W Med Decis Making; 2023; 43(7-8):803-820. PubMed ID: 37842816 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Transparency in risk communication: graphical and analog tools. Kurz-Milcke E; Gigerenzer G; Martignon L Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2008 Apr; 1128():18-28. PubMed ID: 18469211 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Relevance of graph literacy in the development of patient-centered communication tools. Nayak JG; Hartzler AL; Macleod LC; Izard JP; Dalkin BM; Gore JL Patient Educ Couns; 2016 Mar; 99(3):448-454. PubMed ID: 26481910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effectiveness of health animations in audiences with different health literacy levels: an experimental study. Meppelink CS; van Weert JC; Haven CJ; Smit EG J Med Internet Res; 2015 Jan; 17(1):e11. PubMed ID: 25586711 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Health literacy, numeracy, and interpretation of graphical breast cancer risk estimates. Brown SM; Culver JO; Osann KE; MacDonald DJ; Sand S; Thornton AA; Grant M; Bowen DJ; Metcalfe KA; Burke HB; Robson ME; Friedman S; Weitzel JN Patient Educ Couns; 2011 Apr; 83(1):92-8. PubMed ID: 20554149 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Nurses' Numeracy and Graphical Literacy: Informing Studies of Clinical Decision Support Interfaces. Lopez KD; Wilkie DJ; Yao Y; Sousa V; Febretti A; Stifter J; Johnson A; Keenan GM J Nurs Care Qual; 2016; 31(2):124-30. PubMed ID: 26323050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Presenting decision-relevant numerical information to Dutch women aged 50-70 with varying levels of health literacy: Case example of adjuvant systemic therapy for breast cancer. van Strien-Knippenberg IS; Timmermans DRM; Engelhardt EG; Konings IRHM; Damman OC PLoS One; 2024; 19(9):e0309668. PubMed ID: 39226280 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Does Animation Improve Comprehension of Risk Information in Patients with Low Health Literacy? A Randomized Trial. Housten AJ; Kamath GR; Bevers TB; Cantor SB; Dixon N; Hite A; Kallen MA; Leal VB; Li L; Volk RJ Med Decis Making; 2020 Jan; 40(1):17-28. PubMed ID: 31795820 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Graph literacy: a cross-cultural comparison. Galesic M; Garcia-Retamero R Med Decis Making; 2011; 31(3):444-57. PubMed ID: 20671213 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Does Level of Numeracy and Graph Literacy Impact Comprehension of Quality Targets? Findings from a Survey of Home Care Nurses. Dowding DW; Russell D; Jonas K; Onorato N; Barrón Y; Merrill RJA; Rosati RJ AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2017; 2017():635-640. PubMed ID: 29854128 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The impact of home care nurses' numeracy and graph literacy on comprehension of visual display information: implications for dashboard design. Dowding D; Merrill JA; Onorato N; Barrón Y; Rosati RJ; Russell D J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2018 Feb; 25(2):175-182. PubMed ID: 28460091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Icon Arrays for Medical Risk Communication: Do Icon Type and Color Influence Cardiovascular Risk Perception and Recall? Blase R; Meis-Harris J; Weltermann B; Dohle S Med Decis Making; 2024 Aug; 44(6):661-673. PubMed ID: 39056311 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparing the impact of an icon array versus a bar graph on preference and understanding of risk information: Results from an online, randomized study. Scalia P; Schubbe DC; Lu ES; Durand MA; Frascara J; Noel G; O'Malley AJ; Elwyn G PLoS One; 2021; 16(7):e0253644. PubMed ID: 34297713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Does Guiding Toward Task-Relevant Information Help Improve Graph Processing and Graph Comprehension of Individuals with Low or High Numeracy? An Eye-Tracker Experiment. Keller C; Junghans A Med Decis Making; 2017 Nov; 37(8):942-954. PubMed ID: 28618918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A Graph is Worth a Thousand Words: How Overconfidence and Graphical Disclosure of Numerical Information Influence Financial Analysts Accuracy on Decision Making. Cardoso RL; Leite RO; de Aquino AC PLoS One; 2016; 11(8):e0160443. PubMed ID: 27508519 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Does Iconicity in Pictographs Matter? The Influence of Iconicity and Numeracy on Information Processing, Decision Making, and Liking in an Eye-Tracking Study. Kreuzmair C; Siegrist M; Keller C Risk Anal; 2017 Mar; 37(3):546-556. PubMed ID: 27089046 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]