These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Watchdog on a short chain. How good are PPS's quality-of-care reviewers? Kotelchuck R Health PAC Bull; 1987 Jun; 17(3):19-22. PubMed ID: 10301612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Information and Quality Healthcare update. McIlwain JS J Miss State Med Assoc; 1999 Apr; 40(4):139-40. PubMed ID: 10389382 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. How close is North Carolina to meeting Medicare's clinical priorities? Kelley M; McArdle J; Weiser R; Simpson R N C Med J; 2001; 62(4):212-9. PubMed ID: 11468985 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Costs or quality: what do the watchdogs watch? Heinz J Internist; 1986 Jul; 27(6):10, 12. PubMed ID: 10301021 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Perspectives. Cops or colleagues? Fuzzy standards for judging PROs. Cunningham R Faulkner Grays Med Health; 1996 May; 50(20):suppl 1-4. PubMed ID: 10156158 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The vital signs of quality improvement organizations. Pentecost MJ J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 Dec; 2(12):975-8. PubMed ID: 17411979 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. 'Gotcha' gives way to guidance. Quality improvement behind plan to change Medicare review groups' image. Lovern E Mod Healthc; 2001 Dec; 31(51):20. PubMed ID: 11808048 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Review: feedback about practice patterns for measurable improvements in quality of care--a challenge for PROs under the Health Care Quality Improvement Program. Hayes RP; Ballard DJ Clin Perform Qual Health Care; 1995; 3(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 10141395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Denial of payment for poor quality care. Missouri's PRO explains Medicare's latest requirement. Akhter MN; Jaco D Mo Med; 1987 Mar; 84(3):137-40. PubMed ID: 3334407 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Texas Medical Foundation strives for quality medical care. Fitch JF Tex Med; 1989 Mar; 85(3):67-8. PubMed ID: 2652370 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quality assurance and medical stupidity. Glover JL Am Surg; 1991 Aug; 57(8):475-80. PubMed ID: 1928988 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Getting ready for Medicare's new quality reporting program. Division of Advocacy and Health Policy Bull Am Coll Surg; 2007 Apr; 92(4):39-40. PubMed ID: 17427592 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. New developments at the Connecticut Peer Review Organization. Meehan TP Conn Med; 1993 Aug; 57(8):533-5. PubMed ID: 8243082 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. HCFA's close encounter with CQI. QRC Advis; 1992 May; 8(7):1-7. PubMed ID: 10118704 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Legislative update ... quality of care under the Medicare program. Roper WL Health Care Financ Rev; 1986; 8(1):87-91. PubMed ID: 10311781 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Taking the PROs down a new road to quality. Interview by C. Burns Roehrig. Jencks SF Internist; 1992 Oct; 33(9):20-3. PubMed ID: 10121373 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Peer Review Organizations: the future agenda. A report of the American Medical Peer Review Association's Task Force on Peer Review Organization Implementation. Qual Assur Util Rev; 1986 Aug; 1(3):83-90. PubMed ID: 2980883 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]