115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21843779)
1. Simplified quantification of FDG metabolism in tumors using the autoradiographic method is less dependent on the acquisition time than SUV.
Burger IA; Burger C; Berthold T; Buck A
Nucl Med Biol; 2011 Aug; 38(6):835-41. PubMed ID: 21843779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Generation of parametric K
Wu J; Liu H; Ye Q; Gallezot JD; Naganawa M; Miao T; Lu Y; Chen MK; Esserman DA; Kyriakides TC; Carson RE; Liu C
Med Phys; 2021 Sep; 48(9):5219-5231. PubMed ID: 34287939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Repeatability of FDG quantification in tumor imaging: averaged SUVs are superior to SUVmax.
Burger IA; Huser DM; Burger C; von Schulthess GK; Buck A
Nucl Med Biol; 2012 Jul; 39(5):666-70. PubMed ID: 22381783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of Static and Dynamic
Braune A; Hofheinz F; Bluth T; Kiss T; Wittenstein J; Scharffenberg M; Kotzerke J; Gama de Abreu M
J Nucl Med; 2019 Nov; 60(11):1629-1634. PubMed ID: 31053684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Simplified kinetic analysis of tumor 18F-FDG uptake: a dynamic approach.
Sundaram SK; Freedman NM; Carrasquillo JA; Carson JM; Whatley M; Libutti SK; Sellers D; Bacharach SL
J Nucl Med; 2004 Aug; 45(8):1328-33. PubMed ID: 15299057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Direct inference of Patlak parametric images in whole-body PET/CT imaging using convolutional neural networks.
Zaker N; Haddad K; Faghihi R; Arabi H; Zaidi H
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2022 Oct; 49(12):4048-4063. PubMed ID: 35716176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Tumor volumes measured from static and dynamic 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography scan: comparison of different methods using magnetic resonance imaging as the criterion standard.
Chen H; Jiang J; Gao J; Liu D; Axelsson J; Cui M; Gong NJ; Feng ST; Luo L; Huang B
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2014; 38(2):209-15. PubMed ID: 24625616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Feasibility of using abbreviated scan protocols with population-based input functions for accurate kinetic modeling of [
Sari H; Eriksson L; Mingels C; Alberts I; Casey ME; Afshar-Oromieh A; Conti M; Cumming P; Shi K; Rominger A
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2023 Jan; 50(2):257-265. PubMed ID: 36192468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of breast tumor blood flow with dynamic first-pass 18F-FDG PET/CT: comparison with angiogenesis markers and prognostic factors.
Cochet A; Pigeonnat S; Khoury B; Vrigneaud JM; Touzery C; Berriolo-Riedinger A; Dygai-Cochet I; Toubeau M; Humbert O; Coudert B; Fumoleau P; Arnould L; Brunotte F
J Nucl Med; 2012 Apr; 53(4):512-20. PubMed ID: 22343501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of intratumoral inflammatory process on 18F-FDG uptake: pathologic and comparative study with 18F-fluoro-α-methyltyrosine PET/CT in oral squamous cell carcinoma.
Kim M; Achmad A; Higuchi T; Arisaka Y; Yokoo H; Yokoo S; Tsushima Y
J Nucl Med; 2015 Jan; 56(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 25476535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of tumor volumes derived from glucose metabolic rate maps and SUV maps in dynamic 18F-FDG PET.
Visser EP; Philippens ME; Kienhorst L; Kaanders JH; Corstens FH; de Geus-Oei LF; Oyen WJ
J Nucl Med; 2008 Jun; 49(6):892-8. PubMed ID: 18483085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. 18F-FES and 18F-FDG PET for differential diagnosis and quantitative evaluation of mesenchymal uterine tumors: correlation with immunohistochemical analysis.
Zhao Z; Yoshida Y; Kurokawa T; Kiyono Y; Mori T; Okazawa H
J Nucl Med; 2013 Apr; 54(4):499-506. PubMed ID: 23471314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quantitative Analysis of Heterogeneous [
Zhuang M; Karakatsanis NA; Dierckx RAJO; Zaidi H
Mol Imaging Biol; 2019 Apr; 21(2):317-327. PubMed ID: 29956119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Role of SUV(max) obtained by 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with a solitary pancreatic lesion: predicting malignant potential and proliferation.
Hu SL; Yang ZY; Zhou ZR; Yu XJ; Ping B; Zhang YJ
Nucl Med Commun; 2013 Jun; 34(6):533-9. PubMed ID: 23503000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Imaging proliferation in brain tumors with 18F-FLT PET: comparison with 18F-FDG.
Chen W; Cloughesy T; Kamdar N; Satyamurthy N; Bergsneider M; Liau L; Mischel P; Czernin J; Phelps ME; Silverman DH
J Nucl Med; 2005 Jun; 46(6):945-52. PubMed ID: 15937304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The value of liver-based standardized uptake value and other quantitative 18F-FDG PET-CT parameters in neoadjuvant therapy response in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer: correlation with histopathology.
Koç M; Kaya GÇ; Demir Y; Sürücü E; Sarioğlu S; Obuz F; Öztop İ; Görken İB; Sökmen S
Nucl Med Commun; 2015 Sep; 36(9):898-907. PubMed ID: 25969176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. 18F-FDG PET and combined 18F-FDG-contrast CT parameters as predictors of tumor control for hepatocellular carcinoma after stereotactic ablative radiotherapy.
Huang WY; Kao CH; Huang WS; Chen CM; Chang LP; Lee MS; Chao HL; Chiu CH; Lo CH; Jen YM
J Nucl Med; 2013 Oct; 54(10):1710-6. PubMed ID: 23970365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dynamic PET-CT studies for characterizing nasopharyngeal carcinoma metabolism: comparison of analytical methods.
Huang B; Khong PL; Kwong DL; Hung B; Wong CS; Wong CY
Nucl Med Commun; 2012 Feb; 33(2):191-7. PubMed ID: 22107997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Is liver SUV stable over time in ¹⁸F-FDG PET imaging?
Laffon E; Adhoute X; de Clermont H; Marthan R
J Nucl Med Technol; 2011 Dec; 39(4):258-63. PubMed ID: 21878481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Serial assessment of FDG-PET FDG uptake and functional volume during radiotherapy (RT) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
Edet-Sanson A; Dubray B; Doyeux K; Back A; Hapdey S; Modzelewski R; Bohn P; Gardin I; Vera P
Radiother Oncol; 2012 Feb; 102(2):251-7. PubMed ID: 21885145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
