These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21843886)

  • 1. Assisted reproduction services provision in a developing country: time to act?
    Murage A; Muteshi MC; Githae F
    Fertil Steril; 2011 Oct; 96(4):966-8. PubMed ID: 21843886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Access to assisted reproductive technology centers in the United States.
    Nangia AK; Likosky DS; Wang D
    Fertil Steril; 2010 Feb; 93(3):745-61. PubMed ID: 19081563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) in Canada: 2002 results from the Canadian ART Register.
    Gunby J; Daya S;
    Fertil Steril; 2006 Nov; 86(5):1356-64. PubMed ID: 17070192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Recent cigarette smoking and assisted reproductive technologies outcome.
    Fuentes A; Muñoz A; Barnhart K; Argüello B; Díaz M; Pommer R
    Fertil Steril; 2010 Jan; 93(1):89-95. PubMed ID: 18973890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) in Canada: 2006 results from the Canadian ART Register.
    Gunby J; Bissonnette F; Librach C; Cowan L;
    Fertil Steril; 2010 May; 93(7):2189-201. PubMed ID: 19439295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Infertility and assisted reproduction in Denmark. Epidemiology and psychosocial consequences.
    Schmidt L
    Dan Med Bull; 2006 Nov; 53(4):390-417. PubMed ID: 17150146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) in Canada: 2003 results from the Canadian ART Register.
    Gunby J; Daya S;
    Fertil Steril; 2007 Sep; 88(3):550-9. PubMed ID: 17303133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assisted reproductive technology in the United States: 2000 results generated from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Registry.
    ;
    Fertil Steril; 2004 May; 81(5):1207-20. PubMed ID: 15136079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cross-border fertility services in North America: a survey of Canadian and American providers.
    Hughes EG; Dejean D
    Fertil Steril; 2010 Jun; 94(1):e16-9. PubMed ID: 20149916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assisted reproductive technologies in Canada: 2005 results from the Canadian Assisted Reproductive Technologies Register.
    Gunby J; Bissonnette F; Librach C; Cowan L;
    Fertil Steril; 2009 May; 91(5):1721-30. PubMed ID: 18423460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assisted reproductive technologies in developing countries: are we caring yet?
    Vayena E; Peterson HB; Adamson D; Nygren KG
    Fertil Steril; 2009 Aug; 92(2):413-6. PubMed ID: 19324335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Insurance mandates and trends in infertility treatments.
    Henne MB; Bundorf MK
    Fertil Steril; 2008 Jan; 89(1):66-73. PubMed ID: 17482603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A survey of the practices and opinions of the domestic members of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine.
    Keye WR; Bradshaw KD;
    Fertil Steril; 2004 Sep; 82(3):536-42. PubMed ID: 15374686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assisted reproductive technology in the United States: 2001 results generated from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology registry.
    ;
    Fertil Steril; 2007 Jun; 87(6):1253-66. PubMed ID: 17276436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Access to artificial reproduction technology in the Nordic countries in 2004.
    Sol Olafsdottir H; Wikland M; Möller A
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2009; 88(3):301-7. PubMed ID: 19241225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Geographic access to assisted reproductive technology health care in the United States: a population-based cross-sectional study.
    Harris JA; Menke MN; Haefner JK; Moniz MH; Perumalswami CR
    Fertil Steril; 2017 Apr; 107(4):1023-1027. PubMed ID: 28314508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of hysterosalpingography and hysteroscopy in the evaluation of the uterine cavity in patients undergoing assisted reproductive techniques.
    Taşkın EA; Berker B; Ozmen B; Sönmezer M; Atabekoğlu C
    Fertil Steril; 2011 Aug; 96(2):349-352.e2. PubMed ID: 21718998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Who should pay for assisted reproductive techniques? Answers from patients, professionals and the general public in Germany.
    Rauprich O; Berns E; Vollmann J
    Hum Reprod; 2010 May; 25(5):1225-33. PubMed ID: 20228390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Redefining the relationship between sperm deoxyribonucleic acid fragmentation as measured by the sperm chromatin structure assay and outcomes of assisted reproductive techniques.
    Payne JF; Raburn DJ; Couchman GM; Price TM; Jamison MG; Walmer DK
    Fertil Steril; 2005 Aug; 84(2):356-64. PubMed ID: 16084876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Preterm birth and low birth weight after assisted reproductive technology-related pregnancy in Australia between 1996 and 2000.
    Wang YA; Sullivan EA; Black D; Dean J; Bryant J; Chapman M
    Fertil Steril; 2005 Jun; 83(6):1650-8. PubMed ID: 15950632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.