282 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21844137)
21. Experiences of randomization: interviews with patients and clinicians in the SPCG-IV trial.
Bill-Axelson A; Christensson A; Carlsson M; Norlén BJ; Holmberg L
Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2008; 42(4):358-63. PubMed ID: 19230168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Pediatric oncologists' attitudes towards involving adolescents in decision-making concerning research participation.
de Vries MC; Wit JM; Engberts DP; Kaspers GJ; van Leeuwen E
Pediatr Blood Cancer; 2010 Jul; 55(1):123-8. PubMed ID: 20486177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [The analysis of physicians' work: announcing the end of attempts at in vitro fertilization].
Santiago-Delefosse M; Cahen F; Coeffin-Driol C
Encephale; 2003; 29(4 Pt 1):293-305. PubMed ID: 14615699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The randomized fast-track trial in palliative care: role, utility and ethics in the evaluation of interventions in palliative care?
Higginson IJ; Booth S
Palliat Med; 2011 Dec; 25(8):741-7. PubMed ID: 21993806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Topics in research: structuring studies in palliative care.
Davis MP; Mitchell GK
Curr Opin Support Palliat Care; 2012 Dec; 6(4):483-9. PubMed ID: 23123820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Identifying components in consent information needed to support informed decision making about trial participation: An interview study with women managing cancer.
Abhyankar P; Velikova G; Summers B; Bekker HL
Soc Sci Med; 2016 Jul; 161():83-91. PubMed ID: 27261532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Designing and conducting randomized controlled trials in palliative care: A summary of discussions from the 2010 clinical research forum of the Australian Palliative Care Clinical Studies Collaborative.
Shelby-James TM; Hardy J; Agar M; Yates P; Mitchell G; Sanderson C; Luckett T; Abernethy AP; Currow DC
Palliat Med; 2012 Dec; 26(8):1042-7. PubMed ID: 21844138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Quality improvement report: Improving design and conduct of randomised trials by embedding them in qualitative research: ProtecT (prostate testing for cancer and treatment) study. Commentary: presenting unbiased information to patients can be difficult.
Donovan J; Mills N; Smith M; Brindle L; Jacoby A; Peters T; Frankel S; Neal D; Hamdy F
BMJ; 2002 Oct; 325(7367):766-70. PubMed ID: 12364308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Randomized clinical trials: is periodontal research good for patients?
Williams KB; Glaros A; Walker MP; Cobb CM
Periodontol 2000; 2012 Jun; 59(1):32-40. PubMed ID: 22507058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Managing Cancer and Living Meaningfully (CALM): a qualitative study of a brief individual psychotherapy for individuals with advanced cancer.
Nissim R; Freeman E; Lo C; Zimmermann C; Gagliese L; Rydall A; Hales S; Rodin G
Palliat Med; 2012 Jul; 26(5):713-21. PubMed ID: 22042225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Value of information methods for planning and analyzing clinical studies optimize decision making and research planning.
Willan AR; Goeree R; Boutis K
J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 Aug; 65(8):870-6. PubMed ID: 22609138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Participating in a trial in a critical situation: a qualitative study in pregnancy.
Kenyon S; Dixon-Woods M; Jackson CJ; Windridge K; Pitchforth E
Qual Saf Health Care; 2006 Apr; 15(2):98-101. PubMed ID: 16585108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Views of emergency research (VERA): a qualitative study of women and their partners' views of recruitment to trials in severe postpartum haemorrhage.
Snowdon C; Elbourne D; Forsey M; Alfirevic Z
Midwifery; 2012 Dec; 28(6):800-8. PubMed ID: 22369926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Patients or research subjects? A qualitative study of participation in a randomised controlled trial of a complex intervention.
Heaven B; Murtagh M; Rapley T; May C; Graham R; Kaner E; Thomson R
Patient Educ Couns; 2006 Aug; 62(2):260-70. PubMed ID: 16181766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Evaluating the utility of a patient decision aid for potential participants of a prostate cancer trial (RAVES-TROG 08.03).
Sundaresan P; Turner S; Kneebone A; Pearse M; Butow P
Radiother Oncol; 2011 Dec; 101(3):521-4. PubMed ID: 21985948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The evolution of the randomized controlled trial and its role in evidence-based decision making.
Devereaux PJ; Yusuf S
J Intern Med; 2003 Aug; 254(2):105-13. PubMed ID: 12859691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Randomized controlled trials in palliative care: overcoming the obstacles.
Hudson P; Aranda S; McMurray N
Int J Palliat Nurs; 2001 Sep; 7(9):427-34. PubMed ID: 11832846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Pros and cons of pragmatic clinical trials.
Lurie JD; Morgan TS
J Comp Eff Res; 2013 Jan; 2(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 24236521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Patient advocacy and patient centredness in participant recruitment to randomized-controlled trials: implications for informed consent.
Tomlin Z; deSalis I; Toerien M; Donovan JL
Health Expect; 2014 Oct; 17(5):670-82. PubMed ID: 22712887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Informed patient consent to participation in cluster randomized trials: an empirical exploration of trials in primary care.
Eldridge SM; Ashby D; Feder GS
Clin Trials; 2005; 2(2):91-8. PubMed ID: 16279130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
