BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

283 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21844404)

  • 1. Improving the predictive accuracy of Static-99 and Static-2002 with older sex offenders: revised age weights.
    Helmus L; Thornton D; Hanson RK; Babchishin KM
    Sex Abuse; 2012 Feb; 24(1):64-101. PubMed ID: 21844404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Less Is More: Using Static-2002R Subscales to Predict Violent and General Recidivism Among Sexual Offenders.
    Babchishin KM; Hanson RK; Blais J
    Sex Abuse; 2016 Apr; 28(3):187-217. PubMed ID: 25667228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. What Sexual Recidivism Rates Are Associated With Static-99R and Static-2002R Scores?
    Hanson RK; Thornton D; Helmus LM; Babchishin KM
    Sex Abuse; 2016 Apr; 28(3):218-52. PubMed ID: 25810478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Recent research (N = 9,305) underscores the importance of using age-stratified actuarial tables in sex offender risk assessments.
    Wollert R; Cramer E; Waggoner J; Skelton A; Vess J
    Sex Abuse; 2010 Dec; 22(4):471-90. PubMed ID: 21098823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quantifying the relative risk of sex offenders: risk ratios for static-99R.
    Hanson RK; Babchishin KM; Helmus L; Thornton D
    Sex Abuse; 2013 Oct; 25(5):482-515. PubMed ID: 23264543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dynamic risk assessment in sexual offenders using STABLE-2000 and the STABLE-2007: an investigation of predictive and incremental validity.
    Eher R; Matthes A; Schilling F; Haubner-Maclean T; Rettenberger M
    Sex Abuse; 2012 Feb; 24(1):5-28. PubMed ID: 21537058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of the predictive properties of nine sex offender risk assessment instruments.
    Smid WJ; Kamphuis JH; Wever EC; Van Beek DJ
    Psychol Assess; 2014 Sep; 26(3):691-703. PubMed ID: 24773035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The recidivism rates of female sexual offenders are low: a meta-analysis.
    Cortoni F; Hanson RK; Coache MÈ
    Sex Abuse; 2010 Dec; 22(4):387-401. PubMed ID: 21098822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A multisite comparison of actuarial risk instruments for sex offenders.
    Harris GT; Rice ME; Quinsey VL; Lalumière ML; Boer D; Lang C
    Psychol Assess; 2003 Sep; 15(3):413-25. PubMed ID: 14593842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Utility of the Static-99 and Static-99R With Latino Sex Offenders.
    Leguízamo A; Lee SC; Jeglic EL; Calkins C
    Sex Abuse; 2017 Dec; 29(8):765-785. PubMed ID: 26680251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Does Static-99 predict recidivism among older sexual offenders?
    Hanson RK
    Sex Abuse; 2006 Oct; 18(4):343-55. PubMed ID: 17136627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The significance of offending behavior for predicting sexual recidivism among sex offenders of various age groups.
    Janka C; Gallasch-Nemitz F; Biedermann J; Dahle KP
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2012; 35(3):159-64. PubMed ID: 22425764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Predictive accuracy of dynamic risk factors for aboriginal and non-aboriginal sex offenders: an exploratory comparison using STABLE-2007.
    Helmus L; Babchishin KM; Blais J
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2012 Sep; 56(6):856-76. PubMed ID: 21821602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Actuarial risk assessment of sexual offenders: The psychometric properties of the Sex Offender Risk Appraisal Guide (SORAG).
    Rettenberger M; Rice ME; Harris GT; Eher R
    Psychol Assess; 2017 Jun; 29(6):624-638. PubMed ID: 28594206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Is more better? Combining actuarial risk scales to predict recidivism among adult sex offenders.
    Seto MC
    Psychol Assess; 2005 Jun; 17(2):156-67. PubMed ID: 16029103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The accuracy of recidivism risk assessments for sexual offenders: a meta-analysis of 118 prediction studies.
    Hanson RK; Morton-Bourgon KE
    Psychol Assess; 2009 Mar; 21(1):1-21. PubMed ID: 19290762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Predicting recidivism in sex offenders with the Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles (PICTS).
    Walters GD; Deming A; Casbon T
    Assessment; 2015 Apr; 22(2):167-77. PubMed ID: 25013121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Predicting recidivism amongst sexual offenders: a multi-site study of static-2002.
    Hanson RK; Helmus L; Thornton D
    Law Hum Behav; 2010 Jun; 34(3):198-211. PubMed ID: 19536646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Even highly correlated measures can add incrementally to predicting recidivism among sex offenders.
    Babchishin KM; Hanson RK; Helmus L
    Assessment; 2012 Dec; 19(4):442-61. PubMed ID: 22946101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Predictive Validity of the Static-99, Static-99R, and Static-2002/R: Which One to Use?
    Reeves SG; Ogloff JRP; Simmons M
    Sex Abuse; 2018 Dec; 30(8):887-907. PubMed ID: 28597720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.