108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21844780)
1. Stoplight system for pressure ulcer risk assessment.
Creehan SM; Brindle TC
Nursing; 2011 Sep; 41(9):67; quiz 68. PubMed ID: 21844780
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Risk assessment tools for pressure ulcers.
Langemo DK
Adv Wound Care; 1999; 12(1):42-4. PubMed ID: 10326356
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Predicting pressure ulcer sore risk.
Ayello EA
Medsurg Nurs; 2003 Apr; 12(2):130-1. PubMed ID: 12736933
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Risk assessment tools in the prevention of pressure ulcers.
Healey F
J Tissue Viability; 2000 Jan; 10(1):34-5. PubMed ID: 10839095
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The use of a pressure ulcer risk assessment tool for children.
Barnes S
Nurs Times; 2004 Apr 6-12; 100(14):56-8. PubMed ID: 15119137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of three risk assessment scales.
Maylor M; Roberts A
Prof Nurse; 1999 Jun; 14(9):629-32. PubMed ID: 10427299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of skin breakdown risk in children.
Loman DG
J Child Fam Nurs; 2000; 3(3):234-8. PubMed ID: 11905221
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Nursing by numbers: we must use clinical judgement to assess risk.
Healey F
Nurs Times; 2010 Apr 13-19; 106(14):8. PubMed ID: 20446628
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Pressure sore risk assessment.
Flanagan M
J Wound Care; 1998 Oct; 7(9):484. PubMed ID: 9887742
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Evaluating decubitus risk factors, a primary step in prevention].
Guérel MF; Macrez P
Rev Infirm; 2004 Oct; Spec No():4-6. PubMed ID: 15566256
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Risk assessment of decubitus ulcer].
Lang K; Vangelooven C
Krankenpfl Soins Infirm; 2015; 108(9):24-6. PubMed ID: 26485872
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A record sheet for pressure sore risk assessment.
Harding CA
Prof Nurse; 1999 Aug; 14(11):778-82. PubMed ID: 10481708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Skin assessment and pressure ulcer care in hospital-based skilled nursing facilities.
Siem CA; Wipke-Tevis DD; Rantz MJ; Popejoy LL
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2003 Jun; 49(6):42-4, 46, 48 passim, contd. PubMed ID: 12874483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pressure ulcer risk assessment in critical care: interrater reliability and validity studies of the Braden and Waterlow scales and subjective ratings in two intensive care units.
Kottner J; Dassen T
Int J Nurs Stud; 2010 Jun; 47(6):671-7. PubMed ID: 20003975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pressure ulcer prevention. Part 2. Patient assessment.
Gebhardt K
Nurs Times; 2002 Mar 21-27; 98(12):39-42. PubMed ID: 11933783
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. An interrater reliability study of the assessment of pressure ulcer risk using the Braden scale and the classification of pressure ulcers in a home care setting.
Kottner J; Halfens R; Dassen T
Int J Nurs Stud; 2009 Oct; 46(10):1307-12. PubMed ID: 19406400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. From costly treatment to cost-effective prevention: using Waterlow.
Waterlow J
Br J Community Nurs; 2005 Sep; 10(9):S25-6, S28, S30. PubMed ID: 16245392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pressure ulcer risk assessment immediately after cardiac surgery--does it make a difference? A comparison of three pressure ulcer risk assessment instruments within a cardiac surgery population.
Feuchtinger J; Halfens R; Dassen T
Nurs Crit Care; 2007; 12(1):42-9. PubMed ID: 17883663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pressure ulcers: a succinct guide for non-wound specialists.
Simmermacher NT
Adv Nurse Pract; 2005 Mar; 13(3):59-61. PubMed ID: 15777045
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Waterlow assessment: not a predictor.
Waterlow JA
Br J Nurs; 2005 Jul 14-27; 14(13):689. PubMed ID: 16178097
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
