These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21846287)

  • 1. 3-D breast anthropometry of plus-sized women in South Africa.
    Pandarum R; Yu W; Hunter L
    Ergonomics; 2011 Sep; 54(9):866-75. PubMed ID: 21846287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Physical characteristics related to bra fit.
    Chen CM; LaBat K; Bye E
    Ergonomics; 2010 Apr; 53(4):514-24. PubMed ID: 20309747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The impact of age and body mass index on a bra sizing system formed by anthropometric measurements of Sichuan Chinese females.
    Shi Y; Shen H; Taylor LW; Cheung V
    Ergonomics; 2020 Nov; 63(11):1434-1441. PubMed ID: 32658607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bra band size measurements derived from three-dimensional scans are not accurate in women with large, ptotic breasts.
    McGhee DE; Ramsay LG; Coltman CE; Gho SA; Steele JR
    Ergonomics; 2018 Mar; 61(3):464-472. PubMed ID: 28673203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Breast volumetry using a three-dimensional surface assessment technique.
    Koch MC; Adamietz B; Jud SM; Fasching PA; Haeberle L; Karbacher S; Veit K; Schulz-Wendtland R; Uder M; Beckmann MW; Bani MR; Heusinger K; Loehberg CR; Cavallaro A
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2011 Oct; 35(5):847-55. PubMed ID: 21487916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Optimising breast support in female patients through correct bra fit. A cross-sectional study.
    McGhee DE; Steele JR
    J Sci Med Sport; 2010 Nov; 13(6):568-72. PubMed ID: 20451452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Males prefer a larger bust size in women than females themselves: an experimental study on female bodily attractiveness with varying weight, bust size, waist width, hip width, and leg length independently.
    Prantl L; Gründl M
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2011 Oct; 35(5):693-702. PubMed ID: 21359983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An investigation of the suitability of bra fit in women referred for reduction mammaplasty.
    Greenbaum AR; Heslop T; Morris J; Dunn KW
    Br J Plast Surg; 2003 Apr; 56(3):230-6. PubMed ID: 12859918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Standardization of Bra Cup Measurements: Redefining Bra Sizing Language.
    Bengtson BP; Glicksman CA
    Clin Plast Surg; 2015 Oct; 42(4):405-11. PubMed ID: 26408432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Measurement of breast volume using body scan technology(computer-aided anthropometry).
    Veitch D; Burford K; Dench P; Dean N; Griffin P
    Work; 2012; 41 Suppl 1():4038-45. PubMed ID: 22317340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An investigation into breast support and sports bra use in female runners of the 2012 London Marathon.
    Brown N; White J; Brasher A; Scurr J
    J Sports Sci; 2014; 32(9):801-9. PubMed ID: 24479370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Alterations in breast morphology consequent to a 21-day bust developer program.
    Wilmore JH; Atwater AE; Maxwell BD; Wilmore DL; Constable SH; Buono MJ
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1985 Feb; 17(1):106-12. PubMed ID: 3982264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accurate assessment of breast volume: a study comparing the volumetric gold standard (direct water displacement measurement of mastectomy specimen) with a 3D laser scanning technique.
    Yip JM; Mouratova N; Jeffery RM; Veitch DE; Woodman RJ; Dean NR
    Ann Plast Surg; 2012 Feb; 68(2):135-41. PubMed ID: 21587046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bra-breast forces generated in women with large breasts while standing and during treadmill running: Implications for sports bra design.
    McGhee DE; Steele JR; Zealey WJ; Takacs GJ
    Appl Ergon; 2013 Jan; 44(1):112-8. PubMed ID: 22742876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison between breast volume measurement using 3D surface imaging and classical techniques.
    Kovacs L; Eder M; Hollweck R; Zimmermann A; Settles M; Schneider A; Endlich M; Mueller A; Schwenzer-Zimmerer K; Papadopulos NA; Biemer E
    Breast; 2007 Apr; 16(2):137-45. PubMed ID: 17029808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How do respiratory state and measurement method affect bra size calculations?
    McGhee DE; Steele JR
    Br J Sports Med; 2006 Dec; 40(12):970-4. PubMed ID: 17021004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Optimal brassiere wire based on the 3D anthropometric measurements of under breast curve.
    Lee HY; Hong K
    Appl Ergon; 2007 May; 38(3):377-84. PubMed ID: 16828050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prediction of body density in young and middle-aged women.
    Pollock ML; Laughridge EE; Coleman B; Linnerud AC; Jackson A
    J Appl Physiol; 1975 Apr; 38(4):745-9. PubMed ID: 1141107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Predicting cup size after reduction mammaplasty.
    Turner AJ; Dujon DG
    Br J Plast Surg; 2005 Apr; 58(3):290-8. PubMed ID: 15780222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evidence-based recommendations for building better bras for women treated for breast cancer.
    Gho SA; Munro BJ; Jones SC; Steele JR
    Ergonomics; 2014; 57(5):774-86. PubMed ID: 24670005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.