BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21846311)

  • 1. User discomfort, work posture and muscle activity while using a touchscreen in a desktop PC setting.
    Shin G; Zhu X
    Ergonomics; 2011 Aug; 54(8):733-44. PubMed ID: 21846311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hand usage pattern and upper body discomfort of desktop touchscreen users.
    Kang H; Shin G
    Ergonomics; 2014; 57(9):1397-404. PubMed ID: 24919621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The influence of desk and display design on posture and muscle activity variability whilst performing information technology tasks.
    Straker L; Burgess-Limerick R; Pollock C; Maslen B
    Appl Ergon; 2009 Sep; 40(5):852-9. PubMed ID: 18973874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of touch target location on performance and physical demands of computer touchscreen use.
    Kang H; Shin G
    Appl Ergon; 2017 May; 61():159-167. PubMed ID: 28237014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of work-rest schedules and type of task on the discomfort and performance of VDT users.
    Balci R; Aghazadeh F
    Ergonomics; 2003 Apr; 46(5):455-65. PubMed ID: 12745696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Children have less variable postures and muscle activities when using new electronic information technology compared with old paper-based information technology.
    Straker L; Maslen B; Burgess-Limerick R; Pollock C
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2009 Apr; 19(2):e132-43. PubMed ID: 18248823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Posture and discomfort assessment in computer users while using touch screen device as compared with mouse-keyboard and touch pad-keyboard.
    Kargar N; Choobineh AR; Razeghi M; Keshavarzi S; Meftahi N
    Work; 2018; 59(3):341-349. PubMed ID: 29630576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Characterization of posture and comfort in laptop users in non-desk settings.
    Gold JE; Driban JB; Yingling VR; Komaroff E
    Appl Ergon; 2012 Mar; 43(2):392-9. PubMed ID: 21726854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Differences in typing forces, muscle activity, comfort, and typing performance among virtual, notebook, and desktop keyboards.
    Kim JH; Aulck L; Bartha MC; Harper CA; Johnson PW
    Appl Ergon; 2014 Nov; 45(6):1406-13. PubMed ID: 24856862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Surface electromyography and mouse use position.
    Harvey R; Peper E
    Ergonomics; 1997 Aug; 40(8):781-9. PubMed ID: 9336102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ergonomic aspects of portable personal computers with flat panel displays (PC-FPDs): evaluation of posture, muscle activities, discomfort and performance.
    Villanueva MB; Jonai H; Saito S
    Ind Health; 1998 Jul; 36(3):282-9. PubMed ID: 9701908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of forearm support on musculoskeletal discomfort during call centre work.
    Cook C; Burgess-Limerick R
    Appl Ergon; 2004 Jul; 35(4):337-42. PubMed ID: 15159198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of VDT keyboard height and inclination on musculoskeletal discomfort for wheelchair users.
    Wu SP; Yang CH
    Percept Mot Skills; 2005 Apr; 100(2):535-42. PubMed ID: 15974363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluating biomechanics of user-selected sitting and standing computer workstation.
    Lin MY; Barbir A; Dennerlein JT
    Appl Ergon; 2017 Nov; 65():382-388. PubMed ID: 28499555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of a desk attachment board on posture and muscle activity in women during computer work.
    Dumas GA; Upjohn TR; Leger A; Delisle A; Charpentier K; Plamondon A; Salazar E
    Ergonomics; 2008 Nov; 51(11):1735-56. PubMed ID: 18941978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On functional motor adaptations: from the quantification of motor strategies to the prevention of musculoskeletal disorders in the neck-shoulder region.
    Madeleine P
    Acta Physiol (Oxf); 2010 Jun; 199 Suppl 679():1-46. PubMed ID: 20579000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of posture and muscle activity during tablet computer, desktop computer and paper use by young children.
    Straker LM; Coleman J; Skoss R; Maslen BA; Burgess-Limerick R; Pollock CM
    Ergonomics; 2008 Apr; 51(4):540-55. PubMed ID: 18357540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The use of mirrors during an assembly task: a study of ergonomics and productivity.
    Lutz TJ; Starr H; Smith CA; Stewart AM; Monroe MJ; Joines SM; Mirka GA
    Ergonomics; 2001 Feb; 44(2):215-28. PubMed ID: 11209878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of horizontal position of the computer keyboard on upper extremity posture and muscular load during computer work.
    Kotani K; Barrero LH; Lee DL; Dennerlein JT
    Ergonomics; 2007 Sep; 50(9):1419-32. PubMed ID: 17654034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Notebook computer use with different monitor tilt angle: effects on posture, muscle activity and discomfort of neck pain users.
    Chiou WK; Chou WY; Chen BH
    Work; 2012; 41 Suppl 1():2591-5. PubMed ID: 22317111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.