These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21846313)

  • 1. Explicit control of adaptive automation under different levels of environmental stress.
    Sauer J; Kao CS; Wastell D; Nickel P
    Ergonomics; 2011 Aug; 54(8):755-66. PubMed ID: 21846313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Designing automation for complex work environments under different levels of stress.
    Sauer J; Nickel P; Wastell D
    Appl Ergon; 2013 Jan; 44(1):119-27. PubMed ID: 22726906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of adaptive and adaptable automation under different levels of environmental stress.
    Sauer J; Kao CS; Wastell D
    Ergonomics; 2012; 55(8):840-53. PubMed ID: 22506767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of automated decision aids on performance, operator behaviour and workload in a simulated supervisory control task.
    Röttger S; Bali K; Manzey D
    Ergonomics; 2009 May; 52(5):512-23. PubMed ID: 19296323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Individual differences in response to automation: the five factor model of personality.
    Szalma JL; Taylor GS
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2011 Jun; 17(2):71-96. PubMed ID: 21688932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Level of automation effects on performance, situation awareness and workload in a dynamic control task.
    Endsley MR; Kaber DB
    Ergonomics; 1999 Mar; 42(3):462-92. PubMed ID: 10048306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of adaptive task allocation on monitoring of automated systems.
    Parasuraman R; Mouloua M; Molloy R
    Hum Factors; 1996 Dec; 38(4):665-79. PubMed ID: 11536753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of display design on performance in a simulated ship navigation environment.
    Sauer J; Wastell DG; Hockey GR; Crawshaw CM; Ishak M; Downing JC
    Ergonomics; 2002 Apr; 45(5):329-47. PubMed ID: 12028719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Vehicle automation: a remedy for driver stress?
    Funke G; Matthews G; Warm JS; Emo AK
    Ergonomics; 2007 Aug; 50(8):1302-23. PubMed ID: 17558671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sensitivity of candidate markers of psychophysiological strain to cyclical changes in manual control load during simulated process control.
    Hockey GR; Nickel P; Roberts AC; Roberts MH
    Appl Ergon; 2009 Nov; 40(6):1011-8. PubMed ID: 19482260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of response bias and judgment framing on operator use of an automated aid in a target detection task.
    Rice S; McCarley JS
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2011 Dec; 17(4):320-31. PubMed ID: 21707202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Use of the RoboFlag synthetic task environment to investigate workload and stress responses in UAV operation.
    Guznov S; Matthews G; Funke G; Dukes A
    Behav Res Methods; 2011 Sep; 43(3):771-80. PubMed ID: 21487900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Factors affecting performance on a target monitoring task employing an automatic tracker.
    McFadden SM; Vimalachandran A; Blackmore E
    Ergonomics; 2004 Feb; 47(3):257-80. PubMed ID: 14668161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Stress state mediation between environmental variables and performance: the case of noise and vigilance.
    Helton WS; Matthews G; Warm JS
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Mar; 130(3):204-13. PubMed ID: 19167690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Trust in automation. Part II. Experimental studies of trust and human intervention in a process control simulation.
    Muir BM; Moray N
    Ergonomics; 1996 Mar; 39(3):429-60. PubMed ID: 8849495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Automation, task difficulty, and aircrew performance.
    Bowers C; Thornton C; Braun C; Morgan BB; Salas E
    Mil Psychol; 1998; 10(4):259-74. PubMed ID: 11541776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Adaptive automation of human-machine system information-processing functions.
    Kaber DB; Wright MC; Prinzel LJ; Clamann MP
    Hum Factors; 2005; 47(4):730-41. PubMed ID: 16553062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Situation awareness and driving performance in a simulated navigation task.
    Ma R; Kaber DB
    Ergonomics; 2007 Aug; 50(8):1351-64. PubMed ID: 17558674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of a psychophysiological system for adaptive automation on performance, workload, and the event-related potential P300 component.
    Prinzel LJ; Freeman FG; Scerbo MW; Mikulka PJ; Pope AT
    Hum Factors; 2003 winter; 45(4):601-13. PubMed ID: 15055457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Procedural errors in air traffic control: effects of traffic density, expertise, and automation.
    Di Nocera F; Fabrizi R; Terenzi M; Ferlazzo F
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 2006 Jun; 77(6):639-43. PubMed ID: 16780243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.