200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21846554)
1. Comparison of debris removal with three different irrigation techniques.
Howard RK; Kirkpatrick TC; Rutledge RE; Yaccino JM
J Endod; 2011 Sep; 37(9):1301-5. PubMed ID: 21846554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative evaluation of canal isthmus debridement efficacy of modified EndoVac technique with different irrigation systems.
Thomas AR; Velmurugan N; Smita S; Jothilatha S
J Endod; 2014 Oct; 40(10):1676-80. PubMed ID: 25052146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In vitro comparisons of debris removal of the EndoActivator system, the F file, ultrasonic irrigation, and NaOCl irrigation alone after hand-rotary instrumentation in human mandibular molars.
Klyn SL; Kirkpatrick TC; Rutledge RE
J Endod; 2010 Aug; 36(8):1367-71. PubMed ID: 20647098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In vitro canal and isthmus debris removal of the self-adjusting file, K3, and WaveOne files in the mesial root of human mandibular molars.
Dietrich MA; Kirkpatrick TC; Yaccino JM
J Endod; 2012 Aug; 38(8):1140-4. PubMed ID: 22794223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Debris Removal from the Mesial Root Canal System of Mandibular Molars with Laser-activated Irrigation.
Passalidou S; Calberson F; De Bruyne M; De Moor R; Meire MA
J Endod; 2018 Nov; 44(11):1697-1701. PubMed ID: 30241679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Qualitative analysis of the removal of the smear layer in the apical third of curved roots: conventional irrigation versus activation systems.
Blank-Gonçalves LM; Nabeshima CK; Martins GH; Machado ME
J Endod; 2011 Sep; 37(9):1268-71. PubMed ID: 21846545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cleaning efficacy using two engine-driven systems versus manual instrumentation in curved root canals: a scanning electron microscopic study.
Zmener O; Pameijer CH; Alvarez Serrano S; Hernandez SR
J Endod; 2011 Sep; 37(9):1279-82. PubMed ID: 21846548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effectiveness of different final irrigant activation protocols on smear layer removal in curved canals.
Caron G; Nham K; Bronnec F; Machtou P
J Endod; 2010 Aug; 36(8):1361-6. PubMed ID: 20647097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Efficacy of different final irrigation activation techniques on smear layer removal.
Saber Sel-D; Hashem AA
J Endod; 2011 Sep; 37(9):1272-5. PubMed ID: 21846546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Canal and isthmus debridement efficacy of the VPro EndoSafe negative-pressure irrigation technique.
Sarno MU; Sidow SJ; Looney SW; Lindsey KW; Niu LN; Tay FR
J Endod; 2012 Dec; 38(12):1631-4. PubMed ID: 23146651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Supplementary Steps for Removing Hard Tissue Debris from Isthmus-containing Canal Systems.
Keleş A; Alçin H; Sousa-Neto MD; Versiani MA
J Endod; 2016 Nov; 42(11):1677-1682. PubMed ID: 27623498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of the EndoVac system and conventional needle irrigation on removal of the smear layer in primary molar root canals.
Buldur B; Kapdan A
Niger J Clin Pract; 2017 Sep; 20(9):1168-1174. PubMed ID: 29072242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of the cleaning efficacy of a new apical negative pressure irrigating system with conventional irrigation needles in the root canals.
Shin SJ; Kim HK; Jung IY; Lee CY; Lee SJ; Kim E
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Mar; 109(3):479-84. PubMed ID: 20219604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Canal and isthmus debridement efficacy using a sonic irrigation technique in a closed-canal system.
Johnson M; Sidow SJ; Looney SW; Lindsey K; Niu LN; Tay FR
J Endod; 2012 Sep; 38(9):1265-8. PubMed ID: 22892748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The efficacy of ultrasonic irrigation to remove artificially placed dentine debris from human root canals prepared using instruments of varying taper.
van der Sluis LW; Wu MK; Wesselink PR
Int Endod J; 2005 Oct; 38(10):764-8. PubMed ID: 16164691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Micro-CT evaluation of different final irrigation protocols on the removal of hard-tissue debris from isthmus-containing mesial root of mandibular molars.
Silva EJNL; Carvalho CR; Belladonna FG; Prado MC; Lopes RT; De-Deus G; Moreira EJL
Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Feb; 23(2):681-687. PubMed ID: 29744723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Efficacy of the NaviTip FX irrigation needle in removing post instrumentation canal smear layer and debris in curved root canals.
Zmener O; Pameijer CH; Serrano SA; Palo RM; Iglesias EF
J Endod; 2009 Sep; 35(9):1270-3. PubMed ID: 19720229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Efficacy of syringe irrigation, RinsEndo and passive ultrasonic irrigation in removing debris from irregularities in root canals with different apical sizes.
Rödig T; Sedghi M; Konietschke F; Lange K; Ziebolz D; Hülsmann M
Int Endod J; 2010 Jul; 43(7):581-9. PubMed ID: 20636517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The efficacy of ultrasonic irrigation to remove artificially placed dentine debris from different-sized simulated plastic root canals.
Lee SJ; Wu MK; Wesselink PR
Int Endod J; 2004 Sep; 37(9):607-12. PubMed ID: 15317564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison between a smooth wire and a K-file in removing artificially placed dentine debris from root canals in resin blocks during ultrasonic irrigation.
van der Sluis LW; Wu MK; Wesselink PR
Int Endod J; 2005 Sep; 38(9):593-6. PubMed ID: 16104971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
