127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21847036)
1. Benefits and challenges in bowel MR imaging at 3.0 T.
Herrmann KA; Paspulati RM; Lauenstein T; Reiser MF
Top Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Jun; 21(3):165-75. PubMed ID: 21847036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Abdominal magnetic resonance imaging at 3 T: oncological applications.
Marin D; Husarik DB; Boll DT; Merkle EM
Top Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Jun; 21(3):149-56. PubMed ID: 21847034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. High-field magnetic resonance imaging of the pelvis: uterus, ovary, and prostate gland.
Winter LM; Sommer G; Bongartz G
Top Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Jun; 21(3):177-88. PubMed ID: 21847037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Noncontrast-enhanced three-dimensional magnetic resonance aortography of the thorax at 3.0 T using respiratory-compensated T1-weighted k-space segmented gradient-echo imaging with radial data sampling: preliminary study.
Amano Y; Takahama K; Kumita S
Invest Radiol; 2009 Sep; 44(9):548-52. PubMed ID: 19652612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Double-contrast magnetic resonance imaging of the small and large bowel: effectiveness in the evaluation of inflammatory bowel disease.
Maccioni F
Abdom Imaging; 2010 Feb; 35(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 19082651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. T1-Weighted Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Small Bowel: Comparison Between 1.5 and 7 T.
Hahnemann ML; Kraff O; Orzada S; Umutlu L; Kinner S; Ladd ME; Quick HH; Lauenstein TC
Invest Radiol; 2015 Aug; 50(8):539-47. PubMed ID: 25945458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Magnetic resonance imaging of the bowel: today and tomorrow.
Kinner S; Hahnemann ML; Forsting M; Lauenstein TC
Rofo; 2015 Mar; 187(3):160-7. PubMed ID: 25703124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Diagnostic evaluation of chronic inflammatory intestinal diseases in children and adolescents: MRI with true-FISP as new gold standard?].
Hohl C; Haage P; Krombach GA; Schmidt T; Ahaus M; Günther RW; Staatz G
Rofo; 2005 Jun; 177(6):856-63. PubMed ID: 15902636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Role of spectral presaturation attenuated inversion-recovery fat-suppressed T2-weighted MR imaging in active inflammatory bowel disease.
Udayasankar UK; Martin D; Lauenstein T; Rutherford R; Galloway J; Tudorascu D; Sitaraman SV
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Nov; 28(5):1133-40. PubMed ID: 18972354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Liver MR imaging: 1.5T versus 3T.
Ramalho M; Altun E; Herédia V; Zapparoli M; Semelka R
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2007 Aug; 15(3):321-47, vi. PubMed ID: 17893053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Three-dimensional magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue (MOCART) score assessed with an isotropic three-dimensional true fast imaging with steady-state precession sequence at 3.0 Tesla.
Welsch GH; Zak L; Mamisch TC; Resinger C; Marlovits S; Trattnig S
Invest Radiol; 2009 Sep; 44(9):603-12. PubMed ID: 19692843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. MR of the small bowel with a biphasic oral contrast agent (polyethylene glycol): technical aspects and findings in patients affected by Crohn's disease.
Laghi A; Paolantonio P; Iafrate F; Borrelli O; Dito L; Tomei E; Cucchiara S; Passariello R
Radiol Med; 2003; 106(1-2):18-27. PubMed ID: 12951547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cardiovascular MR imaging at 3 T: opportunities, challenges, and solutions.
Rajiah P; Bolen MA
Radiographics; 2014 Oct; 34(6):1612-35. PubMed ID: 25310420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of myocardial viability using delayed enhancement magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 Tesla.
Klumpp B; Fenchel M; Hoevelborn T; Helber U; Scheule A; Claussen C; Miller S
Invest Radiol; 2006 Sep; 41(9):661-7. PubMed ID: 16896300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging of triangular fibrocartilage complex lesions in acute wrist trauma: image quality at different field strengths.
Stehling C; Bachmann R; Langer M; Nassenstein I; Heindel W; Vieth V
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2009; 33(4):579-83. PubMed ID: 19638854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Magnetic resonance angiography of abdominal vessels at 3 T.
Meaney JF; Fagan AJ; Beddy P
Top Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Jun; 21(3):189-97. PubMed ID: 21847038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Current problems and future opportunities of abdominal magnetic resonance imaging at higher field strengths.
Springer F; Martirosian P; Boss A; Claussen CD; Schick F
Top Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Jun; 21(3):141-8. PubMed ID: 21847033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Abdominal MR imaging at 3T.
Merkle EM; Dale BM; Paulson EK
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2006 Feb; 14(1):17-26. PubMed ID: 16530632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dynamic contrast-enhanced renal MRI at 7 Tesla: preliminary results.
Umutlu L; Kraff O; Orzada S; Fischer A; Kinner S; Maderwald S; Antoch G; Quick HH; Forsting M; Ladd ME; Lauenstein TC
Invest Radiol; 2011 Jul; 46(7):425-33. PubMed ID: 21317791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Small bowel MR imaging: 1.5T versus 3T.
Patak MA; von Weymarn C; Froehlich JM
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2007 Aug; 15(3):383-93, vii. PubMed ID: 17893058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
