These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21847378)

  • 1. Human Scalp Electroencephalography Reveals that Repetition Suppression Varies with Expectation.
    Summerfield C; Wyart V; Johnen VM; de Gardelle V
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2011; 5():67. PubMed ID: 21847378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Face Repetition Probability Does Not Affect Repetition Suppression in Macaque Inferotemporal Cortex.
    Vinken K; Op de Beeck HP; Vogels R
    J Neurosci; 2018 Aug; 38(34):7492-7504. PubMed ID: 30030399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Immediate stimulus repetition abolishes stimulus expectation and surprise effects in fast periodic visual oddball designs.
    Feuerriegel D; Keage HAD; Rossion B; Quek GL
    Biol Psychol; 2018 Oct; 138():110-125. PubMed ID: 30208339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Measures of repetition suppression in the fusiform face area are inflated by co-occurring effects of statistically learned visual associations.
    Rostalski SM; Amado C; Kovács G; Feuerriegel D
    Cortex; 2020 Oct; 131():123-136. PubMed ID: 32858473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Unsuppressible Repetition Suppression and exemplar-specific Expectation Suppression in the Fusiform Face Area.
    Pajani A; Kouider S; Roux P; de Gardelle V
    Sci Rep; 2017 Mar; 7(1):160. PubMed ID: 28279012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Temporal expectations modulate face image repetition suppression of early stimulus evoked event-related potentials.
    Feuerriegel D; Churches O; Coussens S; Keage HAD
    Neuropsychologia; 2019 Jan; 122():76-87. PubMed ID: 30468778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Visual mismatch responses index surprise signalling but not expectation suppression.
    Feuerriegel D; Yook J; Quek GL; Hogendoorn H; Bode S
    Cortex; 2021 Jan; 134():16-29. PubMed ID: 33249297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Electrophysiological correlates of perceptual prediction error are attenuated in dyslexia.
    Beach SD; Lim SJ; Cardenas-Iniguez C; Eddy MD; Gabrieli JDE; Perrachione TK
    Neuropsychologia; 2022 Jan; 165():108091. PubMed ID: 34801517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The contribution of surprise to the prediction based modulation of fMRI responses.
    Amado C; Hermann P; Kovács P; Grotheer M; Vidnyánszky Z; Kovács G
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Apr; 84():105-12. PubMed ID: 26873275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Repetition probability effects for inverted faces.
    Grotheer M; Hermann P; Vidnyánszky Z; Kovács G
    Neuroimage; 2014 Nov; 102 Pt 2():416-23. PubMed ID: 25123974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of perceptual expectation on repetition suppression to faces is not modulated by variation in autistic traits.
    Ewbank MP; von dem Hagen EA; Powell TE; Henson RN; Calder AJ
    Cortex; 2016 Jul; 80():51-60. PubMed ID: 26613972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Overlapping multivoxel patterns for two levels of visual expectation.
    de Gardelle V; Stokes M; Johnen VM; Wyart V; Summerfield C
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2013; 7():158. PubMed ID: 23630488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Repetition probability does not affect fMRI repetition suppression for objects.
    Kovács G; Kaiser D; Kaliukhovich DA; Vidnyánszky Z; Vogels R
    J Neurosci; 2013 Jun; 33(23):9805-12. PubMed ID: 23739977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Timing of repetition suppression of event-related potentials to unattended objects.
    Stefanics G; Heinzle J; Czigler I; Valentini E; Stephan KE
    Eur J Neurosci; 2020 Dec; 52(11):4432-4441. PubMed ID: 29802671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perceptual Expectations of Object Stimuli Modulate Repetition Suppression in a Delayed Repetition Design.
    Kronbichler L; Said-Yürekli S; Kronbichler M
    Sci Rep; 2018 Aug; 8(1):12526. PubMed ID: 30131582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Similar Expectation Effects for Immediate and Delayed Stimulus Repetitions.
    Amado C; Rostalski SM; Grotheer M; Wanke N; Kovács G
    Front Neurosci; 2019; 13():1379. PubMed ID: 31920527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of short-term training on repetition probability effects for non-face objects.
    Li C; Kovács G
    Biol Psychol; 2022 Nov; 175():108452. PubMed ID: 36343722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Repetition probability effects depend on prior experiences.
    Grotheer M; Kovács G
    J Neurosci; 2014 May; 34(19):6640-6. PubMed ID: 24806689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The relationship between stimulus repetitions and fulfilled expectations.
    Grotheer M; Kovács G
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Jan; 67():175-82. PubMed ID: 25527870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prior Expectation Modulates Repetition Suppression without Perceptual Awareness.
    Barbosa LS; Kouider S
    Sci Rep; 2018 Mar; 8(1):5055. PubMed ID: 29568041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.