105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21848449)
1. Development of an electronic web-based software for the management of colorectal cancer target referral patients.
Raptis DA; Graf R; Peck J; Mouzaki K; Patel V; Skipworth J; Oberkofler C; Boulos PB
Inform Health Soc Care; 2011 Sep; 36(3):117-31. PubMed ID: 21848449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A single common urgent pathway for all colorectal referrals reduces time to diagnosis and treatment.
Scott MA; Knight A; Brown K; Novell JR
Colorectal Dis; 2006 Nov; 8(9):766-71. PubMed ID: 17032322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Changing trends in the management of colorectal cancers and its impact on cancer waiting times.
Raje D; La Touche S; Mukhtar H; Oshowo A; Ingham Clark C
Colorectal Dis; 2006 Feb; 8(2):140-4. PubMed ID: 16412075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The fourteen-day rule and colorectal cancer.
Walsh S; Bruce C; Bennington S; Ravi S
Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2002 Nov; 84(6):386-8. PubMed ID: 12484576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Using clinical audit, qualitative data from patients and feedback from general practitioners to decrease delay in the referral of suspected colorectal cancer.
Davies E; van der Molen B; Cranston A
J Eval Clin Pract; 2007 Apr; 13(2):310-7. PubMed ID: 17378881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Views of general practitioners and head and neck surgeons on the referral system for suspected cancer: a survey.
Bethell GS; Leftwick P
J Laryngol Otol; 2015 Sep; 129(9):893-7. PubMed ID: 26235148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Referral proformas improve compliance to national colorectal 2-week wait targets: does this affect cancer detection rates?
Jani A; Jenner L; Ma F; Dutton S; Stevens R; Sharma RA;
Colorectal Dis; 2012 Nov; 14(11):1351-6. PubMed ID: 22360704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reducing surgical outpatient waiting is not the solution to meeting the 2005 colorectal cancer target.
Rao GN; Basnyat P; Taffinder N; Hudson C; Insall R
Colorectal Dis; 2006 Feb; 8(2):135-9. PubMed ID: 16412074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A process for developing community consensus regarding the diagnosis and management of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.
Foy JM; Earls MF
Pediatrics; 2005 Jan; 115(1):e97-104. PubMed ID: 15629972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Implementing touch-screen technology to enhance recognition of distress.
Clark K; Bardwell WA; Arsenault T; DeTeresa R; Loscalzo M
Psychooncology; 2009 Aug; 18(8):822-30. PubMed ID: 19085974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of a rapid referral pathway for suspected colorectal cancer in Madrid.
Valentín-López B; Ferrándiz-Santos J; Blasco-Amaro JA; Morillas-Sáinz JD; Ruiz-López P
Fam Pract; 2012 Apr; 29(2):182-8. PubMed ID: 21976660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Why wait for a colonoscopy? An easy cure.
Shoaib A; Hamade A; Zia A; Basnyat PS; Taffinder N
Colorectal Dis; 2006 Jul; 8(6):480-3. PubMed ID: 16784466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical protocol development using Inter/IntraNet technology: the FENARETE system.
Errera A; Merialdo P; Orsano A; Sindoni G; Rumolo G
Stud Health Technol Inform; 1997; 43 Pt A():305-8. PubMed ID: 10179560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The 2-week wait service: a UK tertiary colorectal centre's experience in the early identification of colorectal cancer.
Patel RK; Sayers AE; Seedat S; Altayeb T; Hunter IA
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2014 Dec; 26(12):1408-14. PubMed ID: 25244412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Identification of design features to enhance utilization and acceptance of systems for Internet-based decision support at the point of care.
Gadd CS; Baskaran P; Lobach DF
Proc AMIA Symp; 1998; ():91-5. PubMed ID: 9929188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Family history assessment for colorectal cancer (CRC) risk analysis - comparison of diagram- and questionnaire-based web interfaces.
Schultz M; Seo SB; Holt A; Regenbrecht H
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2015 Nov; 15():95. PubMed ID: 26582273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effectiveness of the '2-week wait' referral service for colorectal cancer.
Leung E; Grainger J; Bandla N; Wong L
Int J Clin Pract; 2010 Nov; 64(12):1671-4. PubMed ID: 20946272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A prospective audit of the implementation of the 2-week rule for assessment of suspected urological cancers.
Coxon JP; Harris HJ; Watkin NA
Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2003 Sep; 85(5):347-50. PubMed ID: 14594541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. UK waiting time targets in lung cancer treatment: are they achievable? Results of a prospective tracking study.
Devbhandari MP; Soon SY; Quennell P; Barber P; Krysiak P; Shah R; Jones MT
J Cardiothorac Surg; 2007 Jan; 2():5. PubMed ID: 17217547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Under utilisation of the 2-week wait initiative for lung cancer by primary care and its effect on the urgent referral pathway.
Lewis NR; Le Jeune I; Baldwin DR
Br J Cancer; 2005 Oct; 93(8):905-8. PubMed ID: 16189521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
