243 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21848979)
1. The relative contribution of band number to phylogenetic accuracy in AFLP data sets.
García-Pereira MJ; Caballero A; Quesada H
J Evol Biol; 2011 Nov; 24(11):2346-56. PubMed ID: 21848979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluating the relationship between evolutionary divergence and phylogenetic accuracy in AFLP data sets.
García-Pereira MJ; Caballero A; Quesada H
Mol Biol Evol; 2010 May; 27(5):988-1000. PubMed ID: 20026482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. AFLPMax: a user-friendly application for computing the optimal number of amplified fragment length polymorphism markers needed in phylogenetic reconstruction.
García-Pereira MJ; Quesada H; Caballero A; Carvajal-Rodríguez A
Mol Ecol Resour; 2012 May; 12(3):566-9. PubMed ID: 22268698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Is homoplasy or lineage sorting the source of incongruent mtdna and nuclear gene trees in the stiff-tailed ducks (Nomonyx-Oxyura)?
McCracken K; Sorenson M
Syst Biol; 2005 Feb; 54(1):35-55. PubMed ID: 15805009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Maximum likelihood estimates of species trees: how accuracy of phylogenetic inference depends upon the divergence history and sampling design.
McCormack JE; Huang H; Knowles LL
Syst Biol; 2009 Oct; 58(5):501-8. PubMed ID: 20525604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The devil in the details: interactions between the branch-length prior and likelihood model affect node support and branch lengths in the phylogeny of the Psoraceae.
Ekman S; Blaalid R
Syst Biol; 2011 Jul; 60(4):541-61. PubMed ID: 21436107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Exploring the relationship between sequence similarity and accurate phylogenetic trees.
Cantarel BL; Morrison HG; Pearson W
Mol Biol Evol; 2006 Nov; 23(11):2090-100. PubMed ID: 16891377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A computer simulation analysis of the accuracy of partial genome sequencing and restriction fragment analysis in the reconstruction of phylogenetic relationships.
Qiao B; Goldberg TL; Olsen GJ; Weigel RM
Infect Genet Evol; 2006 Jul; 6(4):323-30. PubMed ID: 16406823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of deep coalescence and recombination on the estimation of phylogenetic relationships among species using AFLP markers.
García-Pereira MJ; Carvajal-Rodríguez A; Whelan S; Caballero A; Quesada H
Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2014 Jul; 76():102-9. PubMed ID: 24631855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. What is the danger of the anomaly zone for empirical phylogenetics?
Huang H; Knowles LL
Syst Biol; 2009 Oct; 58(5):527-36. PubMed ID: 20525606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The accuracy of species tree estimation under simulation: a comparison of methods.
Leaché AD; Rannala B
Syst Biol; 2011 Mar; 60(2):126-37. PubMed ID: 21088009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bayesian dating of shallow phylogenies with a relaxed clock.
Brown RP; Yang Z
Syst Biol; 2010 Mar; 59(2):119-31. PubMed ID: 20525625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Distinguishing terminal monophyletic groups from reticulate taxa: performance of phenetic, tree-based, and network procedures.
Reeves PA; Richards CM
Syst Biol; 2007 Apr; 56(2):302-20. PubMed ID: 17464885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Exploring rate variation among and within sites in a densely sampled tree: species level phylogenetics of north american tiger beetles (genus cicindela).
Vogler A; Cardoso A; Barraclough T
Syst Biol; 2005 Feb; 54(1):4-20. PubMed ID: 15805007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Towards building the tree of life: a simulation study for all angiosperm genera.
Salamin N; Hodkinson TR; Savolainen Coates V
Syst Biol; 2005 Apr; 54(2):183-96. PubMed ID: 16012091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Use of fluorescent-based amplified fragment length polymorphism to resolve phylogenetic relationships of Colchicum species from Turkey.
Karakaş Metin O; Türktaş M; Ertuğrul F; Kaya E
Genet Mol Res; 2014 Mar; 13(1):1480-90. PubMed ID: 24634246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A penalty of using anonymous dominant markers (AFLPs, ISSRs, and RAPDs) for phylogenetic inference.
Simmons MP; Zhang LB; Webb CT; Müller K
Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2007 Feb; 42(2):528-42. PubMed ID: 16997581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. When being "most likely" is not enough: examining the performance of three uses of the parametric bootstrap in phylogenetics.
Antezana M
J Mol Evol; 2003 Feb; 56(2):198-222. PubMed ID: 12574867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Trees of trees: an approach to comparing multiple alternative phylogenies.
Nye TM
Syst Biol; 2008 Oct; 57(5):785-94. PubMed ID: 18853364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of the accuracies of several phylogenetic methods using protein and DNA sequences.
Hall BG
Mol Biol Evol; 2005 Mar; 22(3):792-802. PubMed ID: 15590907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
