BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21849662)

  • 1. Biomedical innovation: a risky business at risk.
    Stack RS; Harrington RA
    Sci Transl Med; 2011 Aug; 3(96):96cm23. PubMed ID: 21849662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Technology assessment of medical devices at the Center for Devices and Radiological Health.
    Kessler L; Richter K
    Am J Manag Care; 1998 Sep; 4 Spec No():SP129-35. PubMed ID: 10185989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The changing environment for technological innovation in health care.
    Goodman CS; Gelijns AC
    Baxter Health Policy Rev; 1996; 2():267-315. PubMed ID: 11066263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Combination products regulation at the FDA.
    Lauritsen KJ; Nguyen T
    Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2009 May; 85(5):468-70. PubMed ID: 19381151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Who should protect the public? The Supreme Court and medical device regulation.
    Korobkin R
    N Engl J Med; 2007 Oct; 357(17):1680-1. PubMed ID: 17960010
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical research and the development of new devices: considerations for nurses.
    Lanter J
    Dimens Crit Care Nurs; 2007; 26(3):117-20. PubMed ID: 17440296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Medical devices post-approval studies program: vision, strategies, challenges and opportunities.
    Marinac-Dabic D; Bonhomme M; Loyo-Berrios N; Gross T; Ciperson R; Gardner S; Marcarelli M
    Food Drug Law J; 2007; 62(3):597-604. PubMed ID: 17915402
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mechanical ventilation innovations: the manufacturer's perspective.
    DeVries DF
    Respir Care; 1995 Sep; 40(9):942-6. PubMed ID: 10152237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The impact of FDA reform.
    Trunzo J
    Med Device Technol; 2003 Apr; 14(3):36-7. PubMed ID: 12789699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Medical devices: the obvious, the readily-accepted, and the surprising.
    Tolomeo DE; Clarke LA
    J Health Life Sci Law; 2008 Jul; 1(4):117, 119-44. PubMed ID: 18717154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Vioxx, radiology, and the Food and Drug Administration.
    Pentecost MJ
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 May; 2(5):394-7. PubMed ID: 17411841
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. FDA medical device approval: things you didn't learn in medical school or residency.
    Buch B
    Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2007 Aug; 36(8):407-12. PubMed ID: 17849025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. License to maim: federal pre-emption and the Medical Device Amendments of 1976.
    Petrella ME
    Health Matrix Clevel; 1996; 6(2):349-89. PubMed ID: 10178392
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Obstetric and gynecology devices; effective date of requirement for premarket approval for glans sheath devices. Final rule.
    Food and Drug Administration, HHS
    Fed Regist; 2002 Jun; 67(115):40848-9. PubMed ID: 12068899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How do regulatory agencies ensure the release of a safe medical device?
    Haggar B
    Clin Perform Qual Health Care; 1999; 7(2):100-3. PubMed ID: 10747561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Experiences of new product development in the medical device industry.
    Dixon D; Brown A; Meenan BJ; Eatock J
    Med Device Technol; 2006 Apr; 17(3):20-2. PubMed ID: 16736659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The new collaborative path in medical device development: the medical device innovation consortium.
    Kampfrath T; Cotten SW
    Clin Biochem; 2013 Oct; 46(15):1320-2. PubMed ID: 23578741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The nightmare of FDA clearance/approval to market: perception or reality?
    Tylenda CA
    Technol Health Care; 1996 Sep; 4(3):259-67. PubMed ID: 8931236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Of specialty interest: the Food and Drug Administration: a partner in safe practice.
    Baker K
    ORL Head Neck Nurs; 2003; 21(2):25-7. PubMed ID: 12747041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Gastroenterology and urology devices; effective date of requirement for premarket approval of the implanted mechanical/hydraulic urinary continence device. Food and Drug Administration, HHS. Final rule.
    Fed Regist; 2000 Sep; 65(187):57726-32. PubMed ID: 11503643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.