156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21849709)
41. Sun protection factor measurement of sunscreens is dependent on minimal erythema dose.
Damian DL; Halliday GM; Stc Barnetson R
Br J Dermatol; 1999 Sep; 141(3):502-7. PubMed ID: 10583055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. UV index experimental values during the years 2000 and 2001 from the Spanish broadband UV-B radiometric network.
Martínez-Lozano JA; Marín MJ; Tena F; Utrillas MP; Sánchez-Muniosguren L; González-Frías C; Cuevas E; Redondas A; Lorente J; de Cabo X; Cachorro V; Vergaz R; de Frutos A; Díaz JP; Expósito FJ; de la Morena B; Vilaplana JM
Photochem Photobiol; 2002 Aug; 76(2):181-7. PubMed ID: 12194215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Outdoor sports and risk of ultraviolet radiation-related skin lesions in children: evaluation of risks and prevention.
Mahé E; Beauchet A; de Paula Corrêa M; Godin-Beekmann S; Haeffelin M; Bruant S; Fay-Chatelard F; Jégou F; Saiag P; Aegerter P
Br J Dermatol; 2011 Aug; 165(2):360-7. PubMed ID: 21574980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. New advances in protection against solar ultraviolet radiation in textiles for summer clothing.
Aguilera J; de Gálvez MV; Sánchez-Roldán C; Herrera-Ceballos E
Photochem Photobiol; 2014; 90(5):1199-206. PubMed ID: 24861801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Prediction of minimal erythema dose with a reflectance melanin meter.
Damian DL; Halliday GM; Barnetson RS
Br J Dermatol; 1997 May; 136(5):714-8. PubMed ID: 9205504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Additive erythemogenic effects of middle-(280-320 nm) and long-(320-400 nm) wave ultraviolet light.
Ying CY; Parrish JA; Pathak MA
J Invest Dermatol; 1974 Sep; 63(3):273-8. PubMed ID: 4850433
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. Continuous long-term monitoring of UV radiation in professional mountain guides reveals extremely high exposure.
Moehrle M; Dennenmoser B; Garbe C
Int J Cancer; 2003 Mar; 103(6):775-8. PubMed ID: 12516097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Protection by ultraviolet A and B sunscreens against in situ dipyrimidine photolesions in human epidermis is comparable to protection against sunburn.
Young AR; Sheehan JM; Chadwick CA; Potten CS
J Invest Dermatol; 2000 Jul; 115(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 10886505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Determination of erythema-effective solar radiation in Japan and Germany with a spore monolayer film optimized for the detection of UVB and UVA--results of a field campaign.
Furusawa Y; Quintern LE; Holtschmidt H; Koepke P; Saito M
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 1998 Nov; 50(5):597-603. PubMed ID: 9866178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. A sunscreen's labeled sun protection factor may overestimate protection at temperate latitudes: a human in vivo study.
Young AR; Boles J; Herzog B; Osterwalder U; Baschong W
J Invest Dermatol; 2010 Oct; 130(10):2457-62. PubMed ID: 20535128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Relationship between UVB and erythemally weighted radiation.
McKenzie R; Smale D; Kotkamp M
Photochem Photobiol Sci; 2004 Mar; 3(3):252-6. PubMed ID: 14993940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Modeling acute and cumulative erythemal sun exposure on vulnerable body sites during beach vacations utilizing behavior-encoded 3D body models.
Schmalwieser AW; Lohr MA; Daly SM; Williams JD
Photochem Photobiol Sci; 2023 Jan; 22(1):1-20. PubMed ID: 36028652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Sunscreen protection in the ultraviolet A region: how to measure effectiveness.
Diffey B
Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed; 2001 Aug; 17(4):200. PubMed ID: 11499544
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. The eicosanoid response to high dose UVR exposure of individuals prone and resistant to sunburn.
Nicolaou A; Masoodi M; Gledhill K; Haylett AK; Thody AJ; Tobin DJ; Rhodes LE
Photochem Photobiol Sci; 2012 Feb; 11(2):371-80. PubMed ID: 22173231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Effects of p-coumaric acid on erythema and pigmentation of human skin exposed to ultraviolet radiation.
Seo YK; Kim SJ; Boo YC; Baek JH; Lee SH; Koh JS
Clin Exp Dermatol; 2011 Apr; 36(3):260-6. PubMed ID: 21198798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Are current guidelines for sun protection optimal for health? Exploring the evidence.
Lucas RM; Neale RE; Madronich S; McKenzie RL
Photochem Photobiol Sci; 2018 Dec; 17(12):1956-1963. PubMed ID: 29904757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Histological changes produced in skin by equally erythemogenic doses of UV-A, UV-B, UV-C and UV-A with psoralens.
Rosario R; Mark GJ; Parrish JA; Mihm MC
Br J Dermatol; 1979 Sep; 101(3):299-308. PubMed ID: 508596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. [Comparison of the minimal erythema dose for narrowband UV-B and broad spectrum UV-B using a new UV hand-held device].
Lehnen M; Koppermann M; Korber A; Grabbe S; Dissemond J
Hautarzt; 2005 Mar; 56(3):258-64. PubMed ID: 15759083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. The recovery from ultraviolet radiation-induced erythema and melanoma risk factors: a case-control study.
Azizi E; Wax Y; Lusky A; Kushelevsky A; Schewach-Millet M
J Am Acad Dermatol; 1990 Jul; 23(1):30-6. PubMed ID: 2365874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. [The shadow rule and appropriate sun behavior].
Lorentzen HF; Weismann K
Ugeskr Laeger; 2002 Jun; 164(25):3346-50. PubMed ID: 12107949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
