161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21849923)
1. An introduction to comparative effectiveness research.
Marko NF; Weil RJ
Neurosurgery; 2012 Feb; 70(2):425-34; discussion 434. PubMed ID: 21849923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The role of observational investigations in comparative effectiveness research.
Marko NF; Weil RJ
Value Health; 2010 Dec; 13(8):989-97. PubMed ID: 21138497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The use of patient-reported outcomes (PRO) within comparative effectiveness research: implications for clinical practice and health care policy.
Ahmed S; Berzon RA; Revicki DA; Lenderking WR; Moinpour CM; Basch E; Reeve BB; Wu AW;
Med Care; 2012 Dec; 50(12):1060-70. PubMed ID: 22922434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparative effectiveness analysis of alternative strategies to assess hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis function after microsurgical resection of pituitary tumors.
Marko NF; Weil RJ
Neurosurgery; 2011 Jun; 68(6):1576-84; discussion 1585. PubMed ID: 21311380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The implications of comparative effectiveness research for academic medicine.
Rich EC; Bonham AC; Kirch DG
Acad Med; 2011 Jun; 86(6):684-8. PubMed ID: 21512362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Translating comparative effectiveness into practice: the case of diabetes medications.
Shah ND; Mullan RJ; Breslin M; Yawn BP; Ting HH; Montori VM
Med Care; 2010 Jun; 48(6 Suppl):S153-8. PubMed ID: 20473211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Leveraging observational registries to inform comparative effectiveness research.
Shah BR; Drozda J; Peterson ED
Am Heart J; 2010 Jul; 160(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 20598966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.
Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The methods of comparative effectiveness research.
Sox HC; Goodman SN
Annu Rev Public Health; 2012 Apr; 33():425-45. PubMed ID: 22224891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].
Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2008 Dec; 133 Suppl 7():S225-46. PubMed ID: 19034813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.
Jardine C; Hrudey S; Shortreed J; Craig L; Krewski D; Furgal C; McColl S
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2003; 6(6):569-720. PubMed ID: 14698953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Defining comparative effectiveness research: the importance of getting it right.
Sox HC
Med Care; 2010 Jun; 48(6 Suppl):S7-8. PubMed ID: 20473202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Overview of best practices in conducting comparative-effectiveness reviews.
Guise JM; Viswanathan M
Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2011 Dec; 90(6):876-82. PubMed ID: 22048219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Implementation research: a critical component of realizing the benefits of comparative effectiveness research.
Atkins D; Kupersmith J
Am J Med; 2010 Dec; 123(12 Suppl 1):e38-45. PubMed ID: 21184866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Overview of design, implementation and analysis of comparative effectiveness research].
Liao X; Xie YM; Tian F; Shen H
Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi; 2013 Mar; 38(6):930-5. PubMed ID: 23717982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Perioperative comparative effectiveness research.
Memtsoudis SG; Besculides MC
Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol; 2011 Dec; 25(4):535-47. PubMed ID: 22099919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Recommendations for incorporating patient-reported outcomes into clinical comparative effectiveness research in adult oncology.
Basch E; Abernethy AP; Mullins CD; Reeve BB; Smith ML; Coons SJ; Sloan J; Wenzel K; Chauhan C; Eppard W; Frank ES; Lipscomb J; Raymond SA; Spencer M; Tunis S
J Clin Oncol; 2012 Dec; 30(34):4249-55. PubMed ID: 23071244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Application of comparative effectiveness research in evaluation of treatments for type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Ahmann A
Am J Manag Care; 2011 Mar; 17(2 Suppl):S41-51. PubMed ID: 21517656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Methodological challenges of comparative effectiveness research in pain: implications for investigators, clinicians, and policy makers.
Bellows BK; Biskupiak J
J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother; 2011; 25(3):267-74. PubMed ID: 21882980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Scientific and organizational collaboration in comparative effectiveness research: the VA cooperative studies program model.
Huang GD; Ferguson RE; Peduzzi PN; O'Leary TJ
Am J Med; 2010 Dec; 123(12 Suppl 1):e24-31. PubMed ID: 21184863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
