These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21850063)

  • 1. Keep it clean.
    Nature; 2011 Aug; 476(7360):251. PubMed ID: 21850063
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Using criminalization and due process to reduce scientific misconduct.
    Sovacool BK
    Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(5):W1-7. PubMed ID: 16179287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Researcher is arrested for falsifying his results.
    Dyer O
    BMJ; 2014 Jun; 348():g4249. PubMed ID: 24965224
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Research integrity: Sabotage!
    Maher B
    Nature; 2010 Sep; 467(7315):516-8. PubMed ID: 20881988
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ethics and fraud.
    Nature; 2006 Jan; 439(7073):117-8. PubMed ID: 16407910
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Misconduct? It's all academic..
    Nature; 2007 Jan; 445(7125):240-1. PubMed ID: 17230159
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. China introduces sweeping reforms to crack down on academic misconduct.
    Cyranoski D
    Nature; 2018 Jun; 558(7709):171. PubMed ID: 29895918
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Scientists behaving badly.
    Martinson BC; Anderson MS; de Vries R
    Nature; 2005 Jun; 435(7043):737-8. PubMed ID: 15944677
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Policing integrity.
    Nature; 2005 May; 435(7040):248. PubMed ID: 15902211
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Due process in investigations of research misconduct.
    Mello MM; Brennan TA
    N Engl J Med; 2003 Sep; 349(13):1280-6. PubMed ID: 14507953
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Repairing research integrity.
    Titus SL; Wells JA; Rhoades LJ
    Nature; 2008 Jun; 453(7198):980-2. PubMed ID: 18563131
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fraud in scientific research: the prosecutor's approach.
    Willcox BL
    Account Res; 1992; 2(2):139-51. PubMed ID: 16144093
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Both accused researchers and whistle-blowers stay anonymous when no misconduct is found.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2005 Jul; 20(7):8. PubMed ID: 16270443
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Researcher sues government and specific agency official over misconduct investigation.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2001 Feb; 16(2):9. PubMed ID: 12530382
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bureaucracy won't change the character of a cheat.
    Bentley P
    Nature; 2006 Feb; 439(7078):782-4. PubMed ID: 16482126
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Further accusations rock Japanese RNA laboratory.
    Fuyuno I
    Nature; 2006 Apr; 440(7085):720-1. PubMed ID: 16598217
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Meyer: disagreements but no misconduct.
    Vences M; Zardoya R
    Nature; 2004 Sep; 431(7008):505. PubMed ID: 15457231
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Plagiarize or perish?
    Ready T
    Nat Med; 2006 May; 12(5):494. PubMed ID: 16675986
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Confidentiality is essential in misconduct inquiries.
    Mason S; Rutledge C
    Nature; 2007 Mar; 446(7135):492. PubMed ID: 17392764
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Tie funding to research integrity.
    Titus S; Bosch X
    Nature; 2010 Jul; 466(7305):436-7. PubMed ID: 20651673
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.