These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21850063)

  • 21. Health department lays down the law on scientific misconduct.
    Wadman M
    Nature; 2004 Apr; 428(6985):786. PubMed ID: 15103337
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Trial tests Austrian integrity body.
    Abbott A
    Nature; 2012 May; 485(7396):15. PubMed ID: 22552066
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Can't hide your lying eyes.
    Wadman M
    Nat Med; 2006 May; 12(5):494. PubMed ID: 16675985
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Named and shamed.
    Cyranoski D
    Nature; 2006 May; 441(7092):392-3. PubMed ID: 16724027
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Meyer case poses a challenge to the system.
    Málaga-Trillo E; Gerlach G
    Nature; 2004 Sep; 431(7008):505. PubMed ID: 15457230
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Universities scramble to assess scope of falsified results.
    Dalton R
    Nature; 2005 Nov; 438(7064):7. PubMed ID: 16267515
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Sitting in judgement.
    Check E
    Nature; 2002 Sep; 419(6905):332-3. PubMed ID: 12353003
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Do researchers learn to overlook misbehavior?
    Heitman E; Anestidou L; Olsen C; Bulger RE
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2005; 35(5):49. PubMed ID: 16295264
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Assessing the seriousness of research misconduct: considerations for sanction assignment.
    Keranen L
    Account Res; 2006; 13(2):179-205. PubMed ID: 16830407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Defining research misconduct: will we know it when we see it?
    Dresser R
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2001; 31(3):31-2. PubMed ID: 11478122
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. So you suspect someone of fraud. What now?
    Powell K
    Nat Med; 2006 May; 12(5):492. PubMed ID: 16675983
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Scientific misconduct, stem cells, and the way ahead.
    Lindblad WJ
    Wound Repair Regen; 2006; 14(2):101. PubMed ID: 16630096
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Your own desktop crime lab.
    Powell K
    Nat Med; 2006 May; 12(5):493. PubMed ID: 16675984
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Penalties plus high-quality review to fight plagiarism.
    Wittmaack K
    Nature; 2005 Jul; 436(7047):24. PubMed ID: 16001039
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Collaborations: investigating international misconduct.
    Boesz C; Lloyd N
    Nature; 2008 Apr; 452(7188):686-7. PubMed ID: 18401384
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Research conduct. Lessons of the stem cell scandal.
    Cho MK; McGee G; Magnus D
    Science; 2006 Feb; 311(5761):614-5. PubMed ID: 16456065
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Misconduct mayhem.
    Powell K
    Nature; 2006 May; 441(7089):122-3. PubMed ID: 16721916
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. To tell or not to tell? The ethical dilemma of the would-be whistleblower.
    Malek J
    Account Res; 2010 May; 17(3):115-29. PubMed ID: 20461568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Harassment should count as scientific misconduct.
    Marín-Spiotta E
    Nature; 2018 May; 557(7704):141. PubMed ID: 29743701
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Your mission is ... academic fraud and theft are a growing problem as researchers struggle to keep to an ethical code that is never talked about. Now some of science's top names are taking up the fight to keep the profession honest.
    Cohen P
    New Sci; 1999 Jul; 162(2193):38-41. PubMed ID: 11657935
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.