143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21851136)
1. Lynch syndrome screening implementation: business analysis by a healthcare system.
Gudgeon JM; Williams JL; Burt RW; Samowitz WS; Snow GL; Williams MS
Am J Manag Care; 2011 Aug; 17(8):e288-300. PubMed ID: 21851136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Molecular testing for Lynch syndrome in people with colorectal cancer: systematic reviews and economic evaluation.
Snowsill T; Coelho H; Huxley N; Jones-Hughes T; Briscoe S; Frayling IM; Hyde C
Health Technol Assess; 2017 Sep; 21(51):1-238. PubMed ID: 28895526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Costs and outcomes of Lynch syndrome screening in the Australian colorectal cancer population.
Cenin DR; Naber SK; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Jenkins MA; Buchanan DD; Preen DB; Ee HC; O'Leary P
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2018 Oct; 33(10):1737-1744. PubMed ID: 29645364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The predicted impact and cost-effectiveness of systematic testing of people with incident colorectal cancer for Lynch syndrome.
Kang YJ; Killen J; Caruana M; Simms K; Taylor N; Frayling IM; Snowsill T; Huxley N; Coupe VM; Hughes S; Freeman V; Boussioutas A; Trainer AH; Ward RL; Mitchell G; Macrae FA; Canfell K
Med J Aust; 2020 Feb; 212(2):72-81. PubMed ID: 31595523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Different Genetic Testing Strategies for Lynch Syndrome in Taiwan.
Chen YE; Kao SS; Chung RH
PLoS One; 2016; 11(8):e0160599. PubMed ID: 27482709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative effectiveness of screening strategies for Lynch syndrome.
Barzi A; Sadeghi S; Kattan MW; Meropol NJ
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2015 Apr; 107(4):. PubMed ID: 25794514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Which Lynch syndrome screening programs could be implemented in the "real world"? A systematic review of economic evaluations.
Di Marco M; DAndrea E; Panic N; Baccolini V; Migliara G; Marzuillo C; De Vito C; Pastorino R; Boccia S; Villari P
Genet Med; 2018 Oct; 20(10):1131-1144. PubMed ID: 29300371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A systematic review and economic evaluation of diagnostic strategies for Lynch syndrome.
Snowsill T; Huxley N; Hoyle M; Jones-Hughes T; Coelho H; Cooper C; Frayling I; Hyde C
Health Technol Assess; 2014 Sep; 18(58):1-406. PubMed ID: 25244061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cost-effectiveness of routine screening for Lynch syndrome in colorectal cancer patients up to 70 years of age.
Leenen CH; Goverde A; de Bekker-Grob EW; Wagner A; van Lier MG; Spaander MC; Bruno MJ; Tops CM; van den Ouweland AM; Dubbink HJ; Kuipers EJ; Dinjens WN; van Leerdam ME; Steyerberg EW
Genet Med; 2016 Oct; 18(10):966-73. PubMed ID: 26938782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A model-based assessment of the cost-utility of strategies to identify Lynch syndrome in early-onset colorectal cancer patients.
Snowsill T; Huxley N; Hoyle M; Jones-Hughes T; Coelho H; Cooper C; Frayling I; Hyde C
BMC Cancer; 2015 Apr; 15():313. PubMed ID: 25910169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Implementing universal Lynch syndrome screening (IMPULSS): protocol for a multi-site study to identify strategies to implement, adapt, and sustain genomic medicine programs in different organizational contexts.
Rahm AK; Cragun D; Hunter JE; Epstein MM; Lowery J; Lu CY; Pawloski PA; Sharaf RN; Liang SY; Burnett-Hartman AN; Gudgeon JM; Hao J; Snyder S; Gogoi R; Ladd I; Williams MS
BMC Health Serv Res; 2018 Oct; 18(1):824. PubMed ID: 30376847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Universal Screening of Colorectal Cancers for Lynch Syndrome: Challenges and Opportunities.
Vindigni SM; Kaz AM
Dig Dis Sci; 2016 Apr; 61(4):969-76. PubMed ID: 26602911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Universal Versus Targeted Screening for Lynch Syndrome: Comparing Ascertainment and Costs Based on Clinical Experience.
Erten MZ; Fernandez LP; Ng HK; McKinnon WC; Heald B; Koliba CJ; Greenblatt MS
Dig Dis Sci; 2016 Oct; 61(10):2887-2895. PubMed ID: 27384051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cost-effectiveness analysis of genetic diagnostic strategies for Lynch syndrome in Italy.
Pastorino R; Basile M; Tognetto A; Di Marco M; Grossi A; Lucci-Cordisco E; Scaldaferri F; De Censi A; Federici A; Villari P; Genuardi M; Ricciardi W; Boccia S
PLoS One; 2020; 15(7):e0235038. PubMed ID: 32609729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Challenges in the diagnosis and management of Lynch Syndrome in an Indigenous family living in a remote West Australian community.
Schofield L; Goldblatt J; Iacopetta B
Rural Remote Health; 2011; 11(4):1836. PubMed ID: 22188021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of patient preferences on the cost-effectiveness of screening for Lynch syndrome.
Wang G; Kuppermann M; Kim B; Phillips KA; Ladabaum U
Am J Manag Care; 2012 May; 18(5):e179-85. PubMed ID: 22694112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fourfold increased detection of Lynch syndrome by raising age limit for tumour genetic testing from 50 to 70 years is cost-effective.
Sie AS; Mensenkamp AR; Adang EMM; Ligtenberg MJL; Hoogerbrugge N
Ann Oncol; 2014 Oct; 25(10):2001-2007. PubMed ID: 25081898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact of age cutoffs on a lynch syndrome screening program.
Gudgeon JM; Belnap TW; Williams JL; Williams MS
J Oncol Pract; 2013 Jul; 9(4):175-9. PubMed ID: 23942916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluating the impact of universal Lynch syndrome screening in a publicly funded healthcare system.
Lee PWC; Bedard AC; Samimi S; Beard VK; Hong Q; Bedard JEJ; Gilks B; Schaeffer DF; Wolber R; Kwon JS; Lim HJ; Sun S; Schrader KA
Cancer Med; 2020 Sep; 9(18):6507-6514. PubMed ID: 32700475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cost-effectiveness and diagnostic effectiveness analyses of multiple algorithms for the diagnosis of Lynch syndrome.
Gould-Suarez M; El-Serag HB; Musher B; Franco LM; Chen GJ
Dig Dis Sci; 2014 Dec; 59(12):2913-26. PubMed ID: 24957400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
