177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21851260)
1. Photoelastic analysis of cemented or screwed implant-supported prostheses with different prosthetic connections.
Tonella BP; Pellizzer EP; Ferraço R; Falcón-Antenucci RM; Carvalho PS; Goiato MC
J Oral Implantol; 2011 Aug; 37(4):401-10. PubMed ID: 21851260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Photoelastic analysis of biomechanical behavior of single and multiple fixed partial prostheses with different prosthetic connections.
Tonella BP; Pellizzer EP; Falcón-Antenucci RM; Ferraço R; de Faria Almeida DA
J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Nov; 22(6):2060-3. PubMed ID: 22067856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Photoelastic stress analysis in screwed and cemented implant-supported dentures with external hexagon implants.
Pellizzer EP; Tonella BP; Ferraço R; Falcón-Antenucci RM; de Carvalho PS; Alves-Rezende MC
J Craniofac Surg; 2010 Jul; 21(4):1110-3. PubMed ID: 20613577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of implant angulation with different crowns on stress distribution.
Pellizzer EP; Falcón-Antenucci RM; de Carvalho PS; Sánchez DM; Rinaldi GA; de Aguirre CC; Goiato MC
J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 22(2):434-7. PubMed ID: 21403571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Photoelastic analysis of stress distribution with different implant systems.
Pellizzer EP; Carli RI; Falcón-Antenucci RM; Verri FR; Goiato MC; Villa LM
J Oral Implantol; 2014 Apr; 40(2):117-22. PubMed ID: 22208909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Stress distribution in implant-supported prosthesis with external and internal implant-abutment connections.
Coelho Goiato M; Pesqueira AA; Falcón-Antenucci RM; Dos Santos DM; Haddad MF; Bannwart LC; Moreno A
Acta Odontol Scand; 2013 Mar; 71(2):283-8. PubMed ID: 22486241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Photoelastic Analysis on Different Retention Methods of Implant-Supported Prosthesis.
Pimentel AC; Manzi MR; Polo CI; Sendyk CL; da Graça Naclério-Homem M; Sendyk WR
J Oral Implantol; 2015 Jun; 41(3):258-63. PubMed ID: 25198152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Stress distribution of different implant connections associated with multiple implant-supported prostheses.
Goiato MC; Sarauza Arsufi G; de Medeiros RA; Pesqueira AA; da Silva EVF; Sonego MV; Dos Santos DM
J Med Eng Technol; 2018 Jul; 42(5):359-367. PubMed ID: 30251571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Stress distribution in implant-supported prostheses using different connection systems and cantilever lengths: digital photoelasticity.
Goiato MC; Shibayama R; Gennari Filho H; de Medeiros RA; Pesqueira AA; dos Santos DM; de Araújo CA
J Med Eng Technol; 2016; 40(2):35-42. PubMed ID: 26783652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Photoelastic stress analysis of different designs of cement-retained fixed partial dentures on Morse taper oral implants.
Menani LR; Tiossi R; de Torres ÉM; Ribeiro RF; de Almeida RP
J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 22(2):674-8. PubMed ID: 21415635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. FEA of Peri-Implant Stresses in Fixed Partial Denture Prostheses with Cantilevers.
Alencar SM; Nogueira LB; Leal de Moura W; Rubo JH; Saymo de Oliveira Silva T; Martins GA; Moura CD
J Prosthodont; 2017 Feb; 26(2):150-155. PubMed ID: 26588042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Photoelastic analysis of stresses transmitted by universal cast to long abutment on implant-supported single restorations under static occlusal loads.
Aguiar FA; Tiossi R; Macedo AP; Mattos Mda G; Ribeiro RF; Rodrigues RC
J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Nov; 23(7 Suppl 1):2019-23. PubMed ID: 23154374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Photoelastic analysis of the influence of platform switching on stress distribution in implants.
Pellizzer EP; Falcón-Antenucci RM; de Carvalho PS; Santiago JF; de Moraes SL; de Carvalho BM
J Oral Implantol; 2010; 36(6):419-24. PubMed ID: 20545530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Photoelastic analysis of implant-retained and conventional obturator prostheses with different attachment systems and soft relining.
do Prado Ribeiro P; Goiato MC; Pellizzer EP; Pesqueira AA; Haddad MF; de Carvalho Dekon SF; dos Santos DM
J Craniofac Surg; 2011 May; 22(3):797-800. PubMed ID: 21558947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Photoelastic stress analysis of different attachment systems on implant-retained and conventional palatal obturator prostheses.
do Prado Ribeiro P; Goiato MC; Pellizzer EP; Pesqueira AA; Haddad MF; Alves-Rezende MC; dos Santos DM
J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 22(2):523-6. PubMed ID: 21403545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In vitro stress analyses of dental implants supporting screw-retained and cement-retained prostheses.
Kim WD; Jacobson Z; Nathanson D
Implant Dent; 1999; 8(2):141-51. PubMed ID: 10635156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of prosthesis fit and the effect of a luting system on the prosthetic connection preload: an in vitro study.
Duyck J; Naert I
Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(4):389-96. PubMed ID: 12170855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. In vitro evaluation of reverse torque value of abutment screw and marginal opening in a screw- and cement-retained implant fixed partial denture design.
Kim SG; Park JU; Jeong JH; Bae C; Bae TS; Chee W
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(6):1061-7. PubMed ID: 20162110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Screw- vs cement-implant-retained restorations: an experimental study in the Beagle. Part 1. Screw and abutment loosening.
Assenza B; Scarano A; Leghissa G; Carusi G; Thams U; Roman FS; Piattelli A
J Oral Implantol; 2005; 31(5):242-6. PubMed ID: 16265854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Stress distribution in bone simulation model with pre-angled implants.
Goiato MC; Arsufi GS; de Medeiros RA; Pesqueira AA; Guiotti AM; dos Santos DM
J Med Eng Technol; 2015; 39(6):322-7. PubMed ID: 26100976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
