These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. The relationship between myocardial SPECT and fractional flow reserve: is it drifting apart? Rees M Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2010 Feb; 26(2):215-6. PubMed ID: 20033785 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A novel noninvasive technology for treatment planning using virtual coronary stenting and computed tomography-derived computed fractional flow reserve. Kim KH; Doh JH; Koo BK; Min JK; Erglis A; Yang HM; Park KW; Lee HY; Kang HJ; Kim YJ; Lee SY; Kim HS JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Jan; 7(1):72-8. PubMed ID: 24332418 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. FFR in bifurcation stenting: what have we learned? Koo BK; De Bruyne B EuroIntervention; 2010 Dec; 6 Suppl J():J94-8. PubMed ID: 21930499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Angiographically minimal but functionally significant coronary lesion confirmed by optical coherence tomography. Yoon HJ; Cho YK; Nam CW; Kim KB; Hur SH Korean J Intern Med; 2016 Jul; 31(4):807-8. PubMed ID: 27320616 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Tc-99m sestamibi single photon emission computed tomography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel disease: a comparison with quantitative coronary angiography and fractional flow reserve. Förster S; Rieber J; Ubleis C; Weiss M; Bartenstein P; Cumming P; Klauss V; Hacker M Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2010 Feb; 26(2):203-13. PubMed ID: 19760091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Optimization of Tryton dedicated coronary bifurcation system with coregistration of optical coherence tomography and fractional flow reserve. Pyxaras SA; Tu S; Barbato E; Reiber JH; Wijns W JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Jul; 6(7):e39-40. PubMed ID: 23866192 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. How should I treat multiple coronary aneurysms with severe stenoses? Warisawa T; Naganuma T; Nakamura S; Hartmann M; Stoel MG; Louwerenburg JH; Basalus MW; von Birgelen C; Koo BK EuroIntervention; 2015 Nov; 11(7):843-6. PubMed ID: 26603993 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Angiographic versus functional severity of coronary artery stenoses in the FAME study fractional flow reserve versus angiography in multivessel evaluation. Tonino PA; Fearon WF; De Bruyne B; Oldroyd KG; Leesar MA; Ver Lee PN; Maccarthy PA; Van't Veer M; Pijls NH J Am Coll Cardiol; 2010 Jun; 55(25):2816-21. PubMed ID: 20579537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Lack of Reserve: Recognizing the Large Impact of Small Vessels in the Heart. Schmaier AA; Taqueti VR Circulation; 2018 Jul; 138(4):424-428. PubMed ID: 30546157 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. If you want to stent ... do intravascular ultrasound! Hodgson JM JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2010 Aug; 3(8):818-20. PubMed ID: 20723853 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Fractional flow reserve calculation from 3-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography and TIMI frame count: a fast computer model to quantify the functional significance of moderately obstructed coronary arteries. Tu S; Barbato E; Köszegi Z; Yang J; Sun Z; Holm NR; Tar B; Li Y; Rusinaru D; Wijns W; Reiber JH JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Jul; 7(7):768-77. PubMed ID: 25060020 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Decision making in multivessel coronary disease: the need for physiological lesion assessment. Beller GA; Ragosta M JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2010 Mar; 3(3):315-7. PubMed ID: 20298991 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Relative flow reserve derived from quantitative perfusion imaging may not outperform stress myocardial blood flow for identification of hemodynamically significant coronary artery disease. Stuijfzand WJ; Uusitalo V; Kero T; Danad I; Rijnierse MT; Saraste A; Raijmakers PG; Lammertsma AA; Harms HJ; Heymans MW; Huisman MC; Marques KM; Kajander SA; Pietilä M; Sörensen J; van Royen N; Knuuti J; Knaapen P Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Jan; 8(1):. PubMed ID: 25596142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diagnostic accuracy of stress myocardial perfusion imaging compared to invasive coronary angiography with fractional flow reserve meta-analysis. Takx RA; Blomberg BA; El Aidi H; Habets J; de Jong PA; Nagel E; Hoffmann U; Leiner T Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Jan; 8(1):. PubMed ID: 25596143 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Is CT the better angiogram? Coronary interventions and CT imaging. Achenbach S; Ludwig J JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2010 Jan; 3(1):29-31. PubMed ID: 20129527 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Diagnostic value of PET-measured longitudinal flow gradient for the identification of coronary artery disease. Valenta I; Quercioli A; Schindler TH JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Apr; 7(4):387-96. PubMed ID: 24631507 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]