These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21852583)
1. Effect of recommendations from reviewers suggested or excluded by authors. Moore JL; Neilson EG; Siegel V; J Am Soc Nephrol; 2011 Sep; 22(9):1598-602. PubMed ID: 21852583 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of reviewers selected by editors and reviewers suggested by authors. Rivara FP; Cummings P; Ringold S; Bergman AB; Joffe A; Christakis DA J Pediatr; 2007 Aug; 151(2):202-5. PubMed ID: 17643779 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Differences in review quality and recommendations for publication between peer reviewers suggested by authors or by editors. Schroter S; Tite L; Hutchings A; Black N JAMA; 2006 Jan; 295(3):314-7. PubMed ID: 16418467 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Retrospective analysis of the quality of reports by author-suggested and non-author-suggested reviewers in journals operating on open or single-blind peer review models. Kowalczuk MK; Dudbridge F; Nanda S; Harriman SL; Patel J; Moylan EC BMJ Open; 2015 Sep; 5(9):e008707. PubMed ID: 26423855 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Editorial peer reviewers' recommendations at a general medical journal: are they reliable and do editors care? Kravitz RL; Franks P; Feldman MD; Gerrity M; Byrne C; Tierney WM PLoS One; 2010 Apr; 5(4):e10072. PubMed ID: 20386704 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Conflict of Interest Disclosure Policies and Practices in Peer-reviewed Biomedical Journals. Cooper RJ; Gupta M; Wilkes MS; Hoffman JR J Gen Intern Med; 2006 Dec; 21(12):1248-52. PubMed ID: 17105524 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Do author-suggested reviewers rate submissions more favorably than editor-suggested reviewers? A study on atmospheric chemistry and physics. Bornmann L; Daniel HD PLoS One; 2010 Oct; 5(10):e13345. PubMed ID: 20976226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Does masking author identity improve peer review quality? A randomized controlled trial. PEER Investigators. Justice AC; Cho MK; Winker MA; Berlin JA; Rennie D JAMA; 1998 Jul; 280(3):240-2. PubMed ID: 9676668 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Role of Gender in Publication in The Journal of Pediatrics 2015-2016: Equal Reviews, Unequal Opportunities. Williams WA; Garvey KL; Goodman DM; Lauderdale DS; Ross LF J Pediatr; 2018 Sep; 200():254-260.e1. PubMed ID: 30029860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Is there gender bias in JAMA's peer review process? Gilbert JR; Williams ES; Lundberg GD JAMA; 1994 Jul; 272(2):139-42. PubMed ID: 8015126 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Author perception of peer review. Gibson M; Spong CY; Simonsen SE; Martin S; Scott JR Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Sep; 112(3):646-52. PubMed ID: 18757664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Suggested reviewers: friends or foes? Zupanc GKH J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2022 Jul; 208(4):463-466. PubMed ID: 35524786 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Peer review of the biomedical literature. Olson CM Am J Emerg Med; 1990 Jul; 8(4):356-8. PubMed ID: 2194471 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. CORP: Assessing author compliance with data presentation guidelines for manuscript figures. Keehan KH; Gaffney MC; Zucker IH Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol; 2020 May; 318(5):H1051-H1058. PubMed ID: 32196356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Are reviewers suggested by authors as good as those chosen by editors? Results of a rater-blinded, retrospective study. Wager E; Parkin EC; Tamber PS BMC Med; 2006 May; 4():13. PubMed ID: 16734897 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]