BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21853589)

  • 1. Providers weigh Varney exit. Focus on antitrust laws made 'companies take notice'.
    Carlson J
    Mod Healthc; 2011 Jul; 41(28):12-3. PubMed ID: 21853589
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Antitrust and physician payment.
    Pollard MR
    N C Med J; 1984 Apr; 45(4):227-31. PubMed ID: 6585668
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Department of Justice challenging big insurers' "Most Favored Nation" clauses.
    Stepovich M
    Health Care Law Newsl; 1995 Sep; 10(9):3-4. PubMed ID: 10144889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Physician fee-setting requires scrutiny.
    Barnes CE
    Physician Exec; 1989; 15(1):39-40. PubMed ID: 10312890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Learn from experience of IPA targeted in antitrust suit. Mesa County IPA prevailed, but making changes.
    Manag Care Strateg; 1998 May; 6(5):53-4. PubMed ID: 10181769
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Anti-trust implications of independent practice or associations.
    McIntire TJ
    Tenn Med; 2006 Jun; 99(6):31-3. PubMed ID: 16802660
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Is antitrust anti-autonomy?
    Greaney TL
    Health Matrix Clevel; 1996; 6(1):129-45. PubMed ID: 10167164
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. IPA dissolves to settle charges of price-fixing.
    Burda D
    Mod Healthc; 1991 Oct; 21(40):26. PubMed ID: 10114172
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cost containment in the health care field and the antitrust laws.
    Shapiro DI
    Am J Law Med; 1982; 7(4):425-35. PubMed ID: 7102679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluating antitrust risk in joint provider negotiations with payors.
    Leonard EJ
    Med Staff Couns; 1992; 6(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 10115450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Medical care. Antitrust laws emerging exemption.
    Troupis JR
    Benders Health Care Law Mon; 1997 Jul; ():3-10. PubMed ID: 10173326
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Strength in numbers or antitrust trouble?
    Bianculli JL
    Contemp Longterm Care; 1997 May; 20(5):60-1. PubMed ID: 10167546
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bundling patented drugs and medical services: an antitrust analysis.
    Hurwitz MA
    Spec Law Dig Health Care Law; 1992 Jan; (155):7-39. PubMed ID: 10115664
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cross-Market Mergers in Healthcare: Adapting Antitrust Regulation to Address a Growing Concern.
    Lopatka TJ
    Cornell Law Rev; 2017 Apr; 102(3):821-52. PubMed ID: 28379657
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Physician-operated networks and the new antitrust guidelines.
    Kuttner R
    N Engl J Med; 1997 Jan; 336(5):386-91. PubMed ID: 9011808
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Do over in Pennsylvania. Ruling allows West Penn to proceed with lawsuit.
    Evans M
    Mod Healthc; 2010 Dec; 40(49):16. PubMed ID: 21249743
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Oligopsony, health insurance and antitrust.
    Hilsenrath PE; Destigter M
    Med Group Manage J; 1996; 43(2):52-8. PubMed ID: 10155946
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Peer review of fees by physician groups: antitrust issues.
    Scott M
    Health Law Vigil; 1986 Jul; 9(14):5-8. PubMed ID: 10277308
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Collective negotiation and antitrust: Part 3. Antitrust laws and your practice.
    J Miss State Med Assoc; 1990 Feb; 31(2):47-50. PubMed ID: 2313689
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Antitrust implications of chiropractic Peer Review Committees.
    Volper V
    Am J Law Med; 1982; 8(1):45-68. PubMed ID: 7124747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.