These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
46. Institutionalizing midwifery: US and UK style. Perkins BB Midwifery Today Int Midwife; 2008; (85):39-41, 65-7. PubMed ID: 18429520 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. The 'whole truth' about practice. Ellis J J Child Health Care; 1998; 2(4):174-7. PubMed ID: 10451321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Shark-proof your practice. How the law is every nurse's best ally. Holder WL AWHONN Lifelines; 1997 Oct; 1(5):53-7. PubMed ID: 9392750 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. [Expert testimony in malpractice from the physician's viewpoint]. Vorster CF Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1995 Nov; 89(6):584-9; discussion 589-94. PubMed ID: 8588428 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Expert or fact witness: is there a legal obligation to testify? West RW; Sipe CY J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Dec; 1(12):906-7. PubMed ID: 17411731 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. The nurse as an expert witness. Borg E Can Nurse; 2004 Jun; 100(6):38-9. PubMed ID: 15301094 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Defending your position as expert witness. Johnson G RCM Midwives; 2007 Jan; 10(1):38-9. PubMed ID: 17294779 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. [Status and function of the anesthesiologic expert witness in the malpractice process]. Ulsenheimer K Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther; 1995 Feb; 30(1):55-60; discussion 60-5. PubMed ID: 7888524 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. RN not at fault for failure to give epinephrin. Taylor v. Jackson-Madison Cnty. Gen. Hosp., No.W2005-02471-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. App. 8/23/06) -Tn. Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2006 Oct; 47(5):2. PubMed ID: 17117601 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Giving evidence in court. Griffith R Br J Community Nurs; 2017 Jun; 22(6):304-307. PubMed ID: 28570113 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. [The standard of required medical responsibility as an instrument in malpractice cases]. Schreiber HL Versicherungsmedizin; 1995 Feb; 47(1):3-5. PubMed ID: 7709504 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. [Medical expert assessment in criminal processes from the legal viewpoint]. Ulsenheimer K Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1996 Nov; 90(7):574-81. PubMed ID: 9064925 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. CNST maternity standards and assessments and other NHSLA risk management initiatives. Nicholson S; Saunders L Pract Midwife; 2010; 13(7):14-9. PubMed ID: 20669827 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. 'Are we covered to do this?' The legal implications of expanding practice. McGowan B; Long A Paediatr Nurs; 2003 Oct; 15(8):24-7. PubMed ID: 14603771 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. What role do expert witnesses play in malpractice lawsuits? Hirsh BD; Wilcox DP Tex Med; 1992 Nov; 88(11):52-5. PubMed ID: 1488722 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]