282 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21854091)
1. J-shaped versus median sternotomy for aortic valve replacement with minimal extracorporeal circuit.
Yilmaz A; Sjatskig J; van Boven WJ; Waanders FG; Kelder JC; Sonker U; Kloppenburg GT
Scand Cardiovasc J; 2011 Dec; 45(6):379-84. PubMed ID: 21854091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Combined coronary artery bypass grafting and aortic valve replacement with minimal extracorporeal closed circuit circulation versus standard cardiopulmonary bypass.
Yilmaz A; Sjatskig J; van Boven WJ; Waanders FG; Kelder JC; Sonker U; Kloppenburg GT
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2010 Dec; 11(6):754-7. PubMed ID: 20847068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Minimal access aortic valve replacement using a minimal extracorporeal circulatory system.
Yilmaz A; Rehman A; Sonker U; Kloppenburg GT
Ann Thorac Surg; 2009 Mar; 87(3):720-5. PubMed ID: 19231379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Minimally invasive closed circuit versus standard extracorporeal circulation for aortic valve replacement.
Castiglioni A; Verzini A; Pappalardo F; Colangelo N; Torracca L; Zangrillo A; Alfieri O
Ann Thorac Surg; 2007 Feb; 83(2):586-91. PubMed ID: 17257992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Benefits of rapid deployment aortic valve replacement with a mini upper sternotomy.
Chien S; Clark C; Maheshwari S; Koutsogiannidis CP; Zamvar V; Giordano V; Lim K; Pessotto R
J Cardiothorac Surg; 2020 Aug; 15(1):226. PubMed ID: 32847577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Should less-invasive aortic valve replacement be avoided in patients with pulmonary dysfunction?
Albacker TB; Blackstone EH; Williams SJ; Gillinov AM; Navia JL; Roselli EE; Keshavamurthy S; Pettersson GB; Mihaljevic T; Johnston DR; Sabik JF; Lytle BW; Svensson LG
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Jan; 147(1):355-361.e5. PubMed ID: 23332188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement (AVR) compared to standard AVR.
Liu J; Sidiropoulos A; Konertz W
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1999 Nov; 16 Suppl 2():S80-3. PubMed ID: 10613563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mini-sternotomy aortic valve replacement: is it safe and effective? Comparison with standard techniques.
Mahesh B; Navaratnarajah M; Mensah K; Ilsley C; Amrani M
J Heart Valve Dis; 2011 Nov; 20(6):650-6. PubMed ID: 22655495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Aortic valve operations through an upper partial sternotomy].
Kiyama H; Imazeki T; Irie Y; Katayama Y; Murai N; Sato Y; Hata I; Gon S
Kyobu Geka; 1999 Jul; 52(7):519-24; discussion 525-7. PubMed ID: 10402777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Aortic valve replacement with minimal extracorporeal circulation versus standard cardiopulmonary bypass.
Colli A; Fernandez C; Delgado L; Romero B; Camara ML; Ruyra X
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2009 Oct; 9(4):583-7. PubMed ID: 19574264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Rapid-Deployment Versus Conventional Bio-Prosthetic Aortic Valve Replacement.
Smith AL; Shi WY; Rosalion A; Yii M; O'Keefe M; Newcomb AE; Davis P
Heart Lung Circ; 2017 Feb; 26(2):187-193. PubMed ID: 27523460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Limited versus full sternotomy for aortic valve replacement.
Kirmani BH; Jones SG; Malaisrie SC; Chung DA; Williams RJ
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Apr; 4(4):CD011793. PubMed ID: 28394022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Minimally invasive and conventional aortic valve replacement: a propensity score analysis.
Gilmanov D; Bevilacqua S; Murzi M; Cerillo AG; Gasbarri T; Kallushi E; Miceli A; Glauber M
Ann Thorac Surg; 2013 Sep; 96(3):837-43. PubMed ID: 23866805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Outcomes of less invasive J-incision approach to aortic valve surgery.
Johnston DR; Atik FA; Rajeswaran J; Blackstone EH; Nowicki ER; Sabik JF; Mihaljevic T; Gillinov AM; Lytle BW; Svensson LG
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 Oct; 144(4):852-858.e3. PubMed ID: 22244556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Full sternotomy versus right anterior minithoracotomy for isolated aortic valve replacement in octogenarians: a propensity-matched study †.
Gilmanov D; Farneti PA; Ferrarini M; Santarelli F; Murzi M; Miceli A; Solinas M; Glauber M
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2015 Jun; 20(6):732-41; discussion 741. PubMed ID: 25757476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Right anterior minithoracotomy versus conventional aortic valve replacement: a propensity score matched study.
Glauber M; Miceli A; Gilmanov D; Ferrarini M; Bevilacqua S; Farneti PA; Solinas M
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2013 May; 145(5):1222-6. PubMed ID: 22516391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Is transapical aortic valve implantation really less invasive than minimally invasive aortic valve replacement?
Zierer A; Wimmer-Greinecker G; Martens S; Moritz A; Doss M
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2009 Nov; 138(5):1067-72. PubMed ID: 19740493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Is the aortic valve pathology type different for early and late mortality in concomitant aortic valve replacement and coronary artery bypass surgery?
Gunay R; Sensoz Y; Kayacioglu I; Tuygun AK; Balci AY; Kisa U; Demirtas MM; Yekeler I
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2009 Oct; 9(4):630-4. PubMed ID: 19625469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of closed minimal extracorporeal circulation on microvascular tissue perfusion during surgical aortic valve replacement: intravital imaging in a prospective randomized study.
Donndorf P; Park H; Vollmar B; Alms A; Gierer P; Steinhoff G; Kaminski A
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2014 Aug; 19(2):211-7. PubMed ID: 24796334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Midterm results and quality of life after minimally invasive vs. conventional aortic valve replacement.
Detter C; Deuse T; Boehm DH; Reichenspurner H; Reichart B
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2002 Dec; 50(6):337-41. PubMed ID: 12457309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
