192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21854264)
1. Drinking water test methods in crisis-afflicted areas: comparison of methods under field conditions.
Merle R; Bleul I; Schulenburg J; Kreienbrock L; Klein G
Foodborne Pathog Dis; 2011 Nov; 8(11):1185-9. PubMed ID: 21854264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of the lactose Tergitol-7, m-Endo LES, Colilert 18, Readycult Coliforms 100, Water-Check-100, 3M Petrifilm EC and DryCult Coliform test methods for detection of total coliforms and Escherichia coli in water samples.
Hörman A; Hänninen ML
Water Res; 2006 Oct; 40(17):3249-56. PubMed ID: 16916531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of membrane filtration and multiple-tube fermentation by the colilert and enterolert methods for detection of waterborne coliform bacteria, Escherichia coli, and enterococci used in drinking and bathing water quality monitoring in southern sweden.
Eckner KF
Appl Environ Microbiol; 1998 Aug; 64(8):3079-83. PubMed ID: 9687478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of fluorogenic and conventional membrane filter media for enumerating coliform bacteria.
Cenci G; De Bartolomeo A; Caldini G
Microbios; 1993; 76(306):47-54. PubMed ID: 8264433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative performance of Colisure.
McFeters GA; Broadaway SC; Pyle BH; Pickett M; Egozy Y
J Am Water Works Assoc; 1997 Sep; 89(9):112-20. PubMed ID: 11540632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of a new medium for the enumeration of total coliforms and Escherichia coli in Japanese surface waters.
Kodaka H; Mizuochi S; Saito M; Matsuoka H
J Appl Microbiol; 2008 Apr; 104(4):1112-8. PubMed ID: 17976170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of media for enumeration of coliform bacteria and Escherichia coli in non-disinfected water.
Pitkänen T; Paakkari P; Miettinen IT; Heinonen-Tanski H; Paulin L; Hänninen ML
J Microbiol Methods; 2007 Mar; 68(3):522-9. PubMed ID: 17150268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative performance of Colisure (TM) and accepted methods in the detection of chlorine-injured total coliforms and E.coli.
McFeters GA; Broadaway SC; Pyle BH; Pickett M; Egozy Y
Water Sci Technol; 1995; 31(5-6):259-61. PubMed ID: 11539133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of the International Standards Organisation reference method for the detection of coliforms and Escherichia coli in water with a defined substrate procedure.
Niemela SI; Lee JV; Fricker CR
J Appl Microbiol; 2003; 95(6):1285-92. PubMed ID: 14633003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Equivalence test between trial method and reference method of the total coliforms and E. Coli in water].
Wu L; Li X; Liu C; Zhao J; Mao Y; Sun Z; Zheng P
Wei Sheng Yan Jiu; 2017 Sep; 46(5):793-796. PubMed ID: 29903310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A long-term study comparing membrane filtration with Colilert defined substrates in detecting fecal coliforms and Escherichia coli in natural waters.
Buckalew DW; Hartman LJ; Grimsley GA; Martin AE; Register KM
J Environ Manage; 2006 Aug; 80(3):191-7. PubMed ID: 16338057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A simple and cost-effective method for the quantification of total coliforms and Escherichia coli in potable water.
Yáñez MA; Valor C; Catalán V
J Microbiol Methods; 2006 Jun; 65(3):608-11. PubMed ID: 16202463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Chlorine injury and the comparative performance of Colisure (TM), ColiLert (TM) and ColiQuik (TM) for the enumeration of coliform bacteria and E.coli in drinking water.
McFeters GA; Pyle BH; Gillis SJ; Acomb CJ; Ferrazza D
Water Sci Technol; 1993; 27(3-4):261-5. PubMed ID: 11537608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Membrane filtration differentiation of E. coli from coliforms in the examination of water.
Mates A; Shaffer M
J Appl Bacteriol; 1989 Sep; 67(3):343-6. PubMed ID: 2693426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Enumeration of Escherichia coli and coliforms in surface water by multiple tube fermentation and membrane filter methods.
Grasso GM; Sammarco ML; Ripabelli G; Fanelli I
Microbios; 2000; 103(405):119-25. PubMed ID: 11092193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of four β-glucuronidase and β-galactosidase-based commercial culture methods used to detect Escherichia coli and total coliforms in water.
Maheux AF; Dion-Dupont V; Bouchard S; Bisson MA; Bergeron MG; Rodriguez MJ
J Water Health; 2015 Jun; 13(2):340-52. PubMed ID: 26042967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. EU Drinking Water Directive reference methods for enumeration of total coliforms and Escherichia coli compared with alternative methods.
Schets FM; Nobel PJ; Strating S; Mooijman KA; Engels GB; Brouwer A
Lett Appl Microbiol; 2002; 34(3):227-31. PubMed ID: 11874547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Multiparametric comparison of chromogenic-based culture methods used to assess the microbiological quality of drinking water and the mFC method combined with a molecular confirmation procedure.
Maheux AF; Dion-Dupont V; Bisson MA; Bouchard S; Jubinville É; Nkuranga M; Rodrigue L; Bergeron MG; Rodriguez MJ
J Water Health; 2015 Mar; 13(1):67-72. PubMed ID: 25719466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Comparative studies of fresh and seawater for the determination of total coliform and fecal coliform bacteria according to the European Economic Community guideline 76/160 (bathing water) by the use of the most-probable-number method with BRILA-MUG broth and differentiation according to the drinking water ordinance].
Havemeister G; Aleksic S; Bockemühl J; Heinemeyer EA; Müller HE; Von Pritzbuer E
Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed; 1991 May; 191(5-6):523-38. PubMed ID: 1883475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Experiences with the detection of E. coli and coliform bacteria with reference to the drinking water regulation of 1986].
Hübner I; Knoll C; Obst U
Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg B Umwelthyg Krankenhaushyg Arbeitshyg Prav Med; 1989 Feb; 187(3):209-5. PubMed ID: 2494815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
