197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21854383)
1. Efficacy of forensic statement analysis in distinguishing truthful from deceptive eyewitness accounts of highly stressful events.
Morgan CA; Colwell K; Hazlett GA
J Forensic Sci; 2011 Sep; 56(5):1227-34. PubMed ID: 21854383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Differentiation of truthful and deceptive criminal suspects in Behavior Analysis Interviews.
Horvath F; Jayne B; Buckley J
J Forensic Sci; 1994 May; 39(3):793-807. PubMed ID: 8006624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Eyewitness Evidence: Improving Its Probative Value.
Wells GL; Memon A; Penrod SD
Psychol Sci Public Interest; 2006 Nov; 7(2):45-75. PubMed ID: 26158855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. False-evidence ploys and interrogations: mock jurors' perceptions of false-evidence ploy type, deception, coercion, and justification.
Forrest KD; Woody WD; Brady SE; Batterman KC; Stastny BJ; Bruns JA
Behav Sci Law; 2012; 30(3):342-64. PubMed ID: 22315159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Differential effects of practice on the executive processes used for truthful and deceptive responses: an event-related brain potential study.
Johnson R; Barnhardt J; Zhu J
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Aug; 24(3):386-404. PubMed ID: 16099352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Using reality monitoring to improve deception detection in the context of the cognitive interview for suspects.
Logue M; Book AS; Frosina P; Huizinga T; Amos S
Law Hum Behav; 2015 Aug; 39(4):360-7. PubMed ID: 25844516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of eyewitness identification is significantly associated with performance on a standardized test of face recognition.
Morgan CA; Hazlett G; Baranoski M; Doran A; Southwick S; Loftus E
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2007; 30(3):213-23. PubMed ID: 17449097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The self in conflict: the role of executive processes during truthful and deceptive responses about attitudes.
Johnson R; Henkell H; Simon E; Zhu J
Neuroimage; 2008 Jan; 39(1):469-82. PubMed ID: 17919934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Hemispheric asymmetry and deception detection.
Malcolm S; Paul Keenan J
Laterality; 2005 Mar; 10(2):103-10. PubMed ID: 15849029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Using Named Entities for Computer-Automated Verbal Deception Detection.
Kleinberg B; Mozes M; Arntz A; Verschuere B
J Forensic Sci; 2018 May; 63(3):714-723. PubMed ID: 28940300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The reliability of lie detection performance.
Leach AM; Lindsay RC; Koehler R; Beaudry JL; Bala NC; Lee K; Talwar V
Law Hum Behav; 2009 Feb; 33(1):96-109. PubMed ID: 18594955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Efficacy of combining interview techniques in detecting deception related to bio-threat issues.
Morgan CA; Rabinowitz Y; Leidy R; Coric V
Behav Sci Law; 2014; 32(3):269-85. PubMed ID: 24549687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The accuracy of auditors' and layered voice Analysis (LVA) operators' judgments of truth and deception during police questioning.
Horvath F; McCloughan J; Weatherman D; Slowik S
J Forensic Sci; 2013 Mar; 58(2):385-92. PubMed ID: 23406506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Detecting deception: the promise and the reality of voice stress analysis.
Horvath F
J Forensic Sci; 1982 Apr; 27(2):340-51. PubMed ID: 7047675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Detecting lies in children and adults.
Edelstein RS; Luten TL; Ekman P; Goodman GS
Law Hum Behav; 2006 Feb; 30(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 16729205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The contribution of executive processes to deceptive responding.
Johnson R; Barnhardt J; Zhu J
Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(7):878-901. PubMed ID: 14998703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Decreased respiratory sinus arrhythmia in individuals with deceptive intent.
Aikins DE; Martin DJ; Morgan CA
Psychophysiology; 2010 Jul; 47(4):633-6. PubMed ID: 20230501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Stress and deception in speech: evaluating layered voice analysis.
Harnsberger JD; Hollien H; Martin CA; Hollien KA
J Forensic Sci; 2009 May; 54(3):642-50. PubMed ID: 19432740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. When a lie becomes the truth: the effects of self-generated misinformation on eyewitness memory.
Pickel KL
Memory; 2004 Jan; 12(1):14-26. PubMed ID: 15098618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effect of statement type and repetition on deception detection.
Cash DK; Dianiska RE; Lane SM
Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2019 Sep; 4(1):38. PubMed ID: 31549260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
