96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21854514)
1. Effect of oxygen and temperature on the dynamic of the dominant bacterial populations of pig manure and on the persistence of pig-associated genetic markers, assessed in river water microcosms.
Marti R; Mieszkin S; Solecki O; Pourcher AM; Hervio-Heath D; Gourmelon M
J Appl Microbiol; 2011 Nov; 111(5):1159-75. PubMed ID: 21854514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Persistence of microbial and chemical pig manure markers as compared to faecal indicator bacteria survival in freshwater and seawater microcosms.
Solecki O; Jeanneau L; Jardé E; Gourmelon M; Marin C; Pourcher AM
Water Res; 2011 Oct; 45(15):4623-33. PubMed ID: 21745675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Persistence of host-specific Bacteroides-Prevotella 16S rRNA genetic markers in environmental waters: effects of temperature and salinity.
Okabe S; Shimazu Y
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2007 Sep; 76(4):935-44. PubMed ID: 17598108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pig manure contamination marker selection based on the influence of biological treatment on the dominant fecal microbial groups.
Marti R; Dabert P; Pourcher AM
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2009 Aug; 75(15):4967-74. PubMed ID: 19525269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Estimation of pig fecal contamination in a river catchment by real-time PCR using two pig-specific Bacteroidales 16S rRNA genetic markers.
Mieszkin S; Furet JP; Corthier G; Gourmelon M
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2009 May; 75(10):3045-54. PubMed ID: 19329663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Chicken- and duck-associated Bacteroides-Prevotella genetic markers for detecting fecal contamination in environmental water.
Kobayashi A; Sano D; Hatori J; Ishii S; Okabe S
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2013 Aug; 97(16):7427-37. PubMed ID: 23053113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of Lactobacillus sobrius/L. amylovorus as a new microbial marker of pig manure.
Marti R; Dabert P; Ziebal C; Pourcher AM
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2010 Mar; 76(5):1456-61. PubMed ID: 20038684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quantification of host-specific Bacteroides-Prevotella 16S rRNA genetic markers for assessment of fecal pollution in freshwater.
Okabe S; Okayama N; Savichtcheva O; Ito T
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2007 Mar; 74(4):890-901. PubMed ID: 17139508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Development of microbial and chemical MST tools to identify the origin of the faecal pollution in bathing and shellfish harvesting waters in France.
Gourmelon M; Caprais MP; Mieszkin S; Marti R; Wéry N; Jardé E; Derrien M; Jadas-Hécart A; Communal PY; Jaffrezic A; Pourcher AM
Water Res; 2010 Sep; 44(16):4812-24. PubMed ID: 20709349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Molecular identification of fecal pollution sources in water supplies by host-specific fecal DNA markers and Terminal Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism profiles of 16S rRNA gene.
Jeong JY; Gil KI; Lee KH; Ka JO
J Microbiol; 2008 Dec; 46(6):599-607. PubMed ID: 19107387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of two library-independent microbial source tracking methods to identify sources of fecal contamination in French estuaries.
Gourmelon M; Caprais MP; Ségura R; Le Mennec C; Lozach S; Piriou JY; Rincé A
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2007 Aug; 73(15):4857-66. PubMed ID: 17557850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of treatment efficacy and stability of microbial populations between raw and anaerobically treated liquid pig manure, using PCR-DGGE and 16S sequencing.
Bouity-Voubou MD; Frigon JC; Guiot S; Brousseau R
Can J Microbiol; 2008 Feb; 54(2):83-90. PubMed ID: 18388976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quantitative analysis of human and cow-specific 16S rRNA gene markers for assessment of fecal pollution in river waters by real-time PCR.
Jeong JY; Park HD; Lee KH; Hwang JH; Ka JO
J Microbiol Biotechnol; 2010 Feb; 20(2):245-53. PubMed ID: 20208426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of five microbial and four mitochondrial DNA markers for tracking human and pig fecal pollution in freshwater.
He X; Liu P; Zheng G; Chen H; Shi W; Cui Y; Ren H; Zhang XX
Sci Rep; 2016 Oct; 6():35311. PubMed ID: 27734941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Relative inactivation of faecal indicator bacteria and sewage markers in freshwater and seawater microcosms.
Ahmed W; Gyawali P; Sidhu JP; Toze S
Lett Appl Microbiol; 2014 Sep; 59(3):348-54. PubMed ID: 24834814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dynamics of a pig slurry microbial community during anaerobic storage and management.
Peu P; Brugère H; Pourcher AM; Kérourédan M; Godon JJ; Delgenès JP; Dabert P
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2006 May; 72(5):3578-85. PubMed ID: 16672505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Phylogenetic analysis of Bacteroidales 16S rRNA gene sequences from human and animal effluents and assessment of ruminant faecal pollution by real-time PCR.
Mieszkin S; Yala JF; Joubrel R; Gourmelon M
J Appl Microbiol; 2010 Mar; 108(3):974-984. PubMed ID: 19735325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Qualitative and quantitative estimation of host-specific fecal pollution using Bacteroides-Prevotella 16S rRNA genetic markers by T-RFLP and real-time PCR analyses.
Savichtcheva O; Okabe S
Water Sci Technol; 2009; 59(9):1831-40. PubMed ID: 19448320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Development and validation of a microbial source tracking marker for the detection of fecal pollution by muskrats.
Marti R; Zhang Y; Lapen DR; Topp E
J Microbiol Methods; 2011 Oct; 87(1):82-8. PubMed ID: 21807034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Survival and persistence of host-associated Bacteroidales cells and DNA in comparison with Escherichia coli and Enterococcus in freshwater sediments as quantified by PMA-qPCR and qPCR.
Kim M; Wuertz S
Water Res; 2015 Dec; 87():182-92. PubMed ID: 26408951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
